Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers | Law & Society Review | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study examines why the public supports the punishment of rule breakers. It does so within the context of a recently enacted California initiative mandating life in prison for repeat felons (the “three strikes” law). Antecedents of three aspects of people's reactions to rule breakers are explored: (1) support for the three strikes initiative, (2) support for punitiveness in dealing with rule breakers, and (3) willingness to abandon procedural protections when dealing with potential rule breakers. The results of interviews with members of the public suggest that the widely held view that public punitiveness develops primarily from concerns about crime and the courts and is primarily linked to public views about risk and dangerousness is incorrect. While these factors do influence public feelings, they are not the central reasons underlying public punitiveness. Instead, the source of people's concerns lies primarily in their evaluations of social conditions, including the decline in morality and discipline within the family and increases in the diversity of society. These concerns are about issues of moral cohesion—with people feeling that the quality and extent of social bonds and social consensus has deteriorated in American society.

References

Abrams, Dominic, & Hogg, Michael A. (1990) Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Adler, Jane W., Hensler, Deborah R., & Nelson, Charles E. (1983) Simple Justice: How Litigants Fare in the Pittsburgh Court Arbitration Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Altemeyer, Robert (1981) Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: Univ. of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Azzi, Assaad (in press) “From Competitive Interests, Perceived Injustice and Identity Needs to Collective Action: Psychological Mechanisms of Ethnic Nationalism,” in Kapferer, B., ed., Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Violence.Google Scholar

Bies, Robert J., & Tripp, Thomas M. (1996) “Beyond Distrust: ‘Getting Even’ and the Need for Revenge,” in Kramer & Tyler 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boeckmann, Robert, & Tyler, Tom R. (1996) “Liabilities of Group Membership: Social Identification and Categorization Influences on Retributive Justice.” Unpub. MS., Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John (1989) Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Rupert (1988) Group Processes: Dynamics within and between Groups. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carroll, John S., Perkowitz, William T., Lurigio, Arthur J., & Weaver, Frances M. (1987) “Sentencing Goals, Causal Attributions, Ideology, and Personality,” 52 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 107–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Castellano, Thomas C., & McGarrell, Edmund F. (1991) “The Politics of Law and Order: Case Study Evidence for a Conflict Model of the Criminal Law Formation Process,” 28 J. of Research on Crime & Delinquency 304–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chancer, Lynn, & Donovan, Pamela (1994) “A Mass Psychology of Punishment: Crime and the Futility of Rationally Based Approaches,” 21 (3) Social Justice 50–72.Google Scholar

Cohn, Ellen S., & White, Susan O. (1990) Legal Socialization: A Study of Norms and Rules. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohn, Steven F., Barkan, Steven E., & Halteman, William A. (1991) “Punitive Attitudes toward Criminals: Racial Consensus or Racial Conflict,” 38 Social Problems 287–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, John M., & O'Barr, William M. (1990) Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cullen, Francis T., Clark, Gregory A., Cullen, John B., & Mathers, Richard A. (1985) “Attribution, Salience, and Attitudes toward Criminal Sentencing,” 12 Criminal Justice & Behavior 305–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doob, Anthony N., & Roberts, Julian L. (1988) “Public Punitiveness and Public Knowledge of the Facts: Some Canadian Surveys,” in Walker, N. & Hough, M., eds., Public Attitudes to Sentencing: Surveys from Five Countries. Aldershot, Eng.: Gower.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile (1933) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar

Ellsworth, Phoebe C., & Gross, Samuel R. (1994) “Hardening of the Attitudes: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty,” 50 J. of Social Issues 19–52.CrossRef. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Fondacaro, Mark R., & Dunkle, Michael E. (1996) “Procedural Justice in Resolving Family Disputes: A Psychosocial Analysis of Individual and Family Functioning in Late Adolescence.” Center on Children, Family & the Law, Univ. of Nebraska.Google Scholar

Furnham, Adrian, & Henderson, Monika (1983) “Lay Theories of Delinquency,” 13 European J. of Social Psychology 107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garland, David (1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaubatz, Kathlyn Taylor (1995) Crime in the Public Mind. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, Peter W., Rydell, C. Peter, Abrahamse, Allan F., Caulkins, Jonathan P., Chiesa, James, Model, Karyn E., & Klein, Stephen P. (1994) Three Strikes and You're Out: Estimated Benefits and Costs of California's New Mandatory-Sentencing Law. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.,” 17 Law & Human Behavior 553–67.CrossRef,” 42 Public Opinion Q. 464–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, Melvin J., & Lerner, Sally C., eds. (1981) The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, E. Allan, & Tyler, Tom R. (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin, & Schneider, William (1983) The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Liska, Allen E., & Bellair, Paul E. (1995) “Violent-Crime Rates and Racial Composition: Convergence over Time,” 101 American J. of Sociology 578–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCoun, Robert J., Lind, E. Allan, Hensler, Deborah R., Bryant, David L., & Ebener, Patricia A. (1988) Alternative Adjudication: An Evaluation of the New Jersey Automobile Arbitration Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

McClosky, Herbert, & Brill, Alida (1983) Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe about Civil Liberties. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

McLarney, Timothy P. (1996) “Rational Public(s)?: Personal Risk, Risk Perceptions, and Policy Preferences Regarding Crime in America, 1973–1991.” Delivered at Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago (April).Google Scholar

Miller, Dale T., & Vidmar, Neil (1981) “The Social Psychology of Punishment Reactions,” in Lerner & Lerner 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niemi, Richard G. (1973) “Political Socialization,” in Knutson, J. N., ed., Handbook of Political Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Oakes, Penelope J., Haslam, S. Alexander, & Turner, John C. (1994) Stereotyping and Social Reality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Paternoster, Raymond, Brame, Robert, Bachman, Ronet, & Sherman, Lawrence W. (1997) “Do Fair Procedures Matter?: The Effect of Procedural Justice on Spouse Assault,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poythress, Norman G. (1994) “Procedural Preferences, Perceptions of Fairness, and Compliance with Outcomes: A Study of Alternatives to the Standard Advocacy Trial Procedure,” 18 Law & Human Behavior 361–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pruitt, Dean G., Peirce, Robert S., McGillicuddy, Neil B., Welton, Gary L., & Castrianno, Lynn M. (1993) “Long-Term Success in Mediation,” 17 Law & Human Behavior 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Julian L. (1996) “Public Opinion, Criminal Record, and the Sentencing Process,” 39 Scientist 488.Google Scholar

Robinson, John P., & Shaver, Phillip R. (1973) Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

Robinson, Paul H., & Darley, John M. (1995) Justice, Liability, and Blame: Community Views and the Criminal Law. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Rubin, Lillian B. (1986) Quiet Rage: Bernie Goetz in a Time of Madness. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar

Sanders, Joseph, & Hamilton, V. Lee (1987) “Is There a ‘Common Law’ of Responsibility?” 11 Law & Human Behavior 277–97.Google Scholar

Sarat, Austin (1977) “Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey Evidence,” 11 Law & Society Rev. 427–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savelsberg, Joachim J. (1994) “Knowledge, Domination, and Criminal Punishment,” 99 American J. of Sociology 911.Google Scholar

Scheingold, Stuart A. (1974) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Scheingold, Stuart A. (1991) The Politics of Street Crime: Criminal Processes and Cultural Obsession. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Sears, David O. (1990) “Whither Political Socialization Research? The Question of Persistence,” in Ichilov, O., ed., Political Socialization, Citizenship Education, and Democracy. New York: Teacher's College Press.Google Scholar

Sears, David O., & Funk, Carolyn L. (1990a) “The Limited Effect of Economic Self-Interest on the Political Attitudes of the Mass Public,” 19 J. of Behavioral Economics 247–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sears, David O., & Funk, Carolyn L. (1990b) “Self-interest in Americans' Political Opinions,” in Mansbridge, J. J., ed., Beyond Self-Interest. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sears, David O., & Huddy, Leonie (1993) “The Symbolic Politics of Opposition to Bilingual Education,” in Worchel, S. & Simpson, J. A., eds., Conflict between People and Groups: Causes, Processes, and Resolutions. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

Sears, David O., & Kinder, Donald R. (1985) “Whites' Opposition to Busing: On Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Group Conflict,” 48 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 1148–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sears, David O., Lau, Richard R., Tyler, Tom R., & Allen, Harris M. Jr. (1980) “Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting,” 74 American Political Science Rev. 670–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, Jonathan (1995) “They Died with Their Boots on: The Boot Camp and the Limits of Modern Penality,” 22 (2) Social Justice 25–49.Google Scholar

Smith, H. J., & Tyler, Tom R. (1997) “Choosing the Right Pond: The Impact of Group Membership on Self-Esteem and Group-Oriented Behavior,” 33 J. of Experimental Social Psychology 146–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stinchcombe, Arthur L., Adams, Rebecca, Heimer, Carol A., Scheppele, Kim Lane, Smith, Tom W., & Taylor, D. Garth (1980) Crime and Punishment—Changing Attitudes in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Sullivan, John Lawrence, Piereson, James, & Marcus, George E. (1982) Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, D. Garth, Scheppele, Kim Lane, & Stinchcombe, Arthur L. (1979) “Salience of Crime and Support for Harsher Criminal Sanctions,” 26 Social Problems 413–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tittle, Charles R. (1977) “Sanction Fear and the Maintenance of Social Order,” 55 Social Forces 579–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Troldahl, Verling, & Carter, Roy (1964) “Random Selection of Respondents within Households in Phone Surveys,” 1 J. of Marketing Research 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, John C. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Turner, John C. (1991) Social Influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar

Turner, John C., & Giles, Howard, eds. (1981) Intergroup Behavior. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R. (1984) “Assessing the Risk of Crime Victimization: The Integration of Personal Victimization Experience and Socially Transmitted Information,” 40 J. of Social Issues 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, Tom R. (1988) “What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 103–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, Tom R. (1989) “The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of the Group-Value Model,” 57 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 830–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, Tom R. (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R. (1995a) “The Psychology of Legitimacy.” MS., Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R. (1995b) “Ethnicity and Disputing.” MS., Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R., Boeckmann, Robert J., Smith, Heather J., & Huo, Yuen J. (1997) Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R., & Cook, Fay Lomax (1984) “The Mass Media and Judgments of Risk: Distinguishing Impact on Personal and Societal Level Judgments,” 47 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, Tom R., & Degoey, Peter (1995) “Collective Restraint in a Social Dilemma Situation,” 69 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 482–97.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R., & Degoey, Peter (1996) “Trust in Organizational Authorities: The Influence of Motive Attributions on Willingness to Accept Decisions,” in Kramer & Tyler 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, Tom R., Degoey, Peter, & Smith, Heather J. (1996) “Understanding Why the Justice of Group Procedures Matters: A Test of the Psychological Dynamics of the Group-Value Model,” 70 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 913–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, Tom R., & Lind, E. Allan (1992) “A Relational Model of Authority in Groups,” in Zanna, M. P., ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R., & Lind, E. Allan (in press) “Procedural Justice,” in Sanders, J. & Hamilton, V. L., eds., Handbooks of Law and Social Science: Justice Reader. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R., & Smith, Heather J. (1997) “Social Justice and Social Movements,” in D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey, eds., Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Tyler Tom, R., & Weber, Renee (1982) “Support for the Death Penalty: Instrumental Response to Crime or Symbolic Attitude?” 17 Law of Society Rev. 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vidmar, Neil (1974) “Retributive and Utilitarian Motives and Other Correlates of Canadian Attitudes toward the Death Penalty,” 15 Canadian Psychologist 337–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vidmar, Neil, & Ellsworth, Phoebe (1974) “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty,” 26 Stanford Law Rev. 1245–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vidmar, Neil, & Miller, Dale T. (1980) “Socialpsychological Processes Underlying Attitudes toward Legal Punishment,” 14 Law & Society Rev. 565–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zamble, Edward, & Kalm, Kerry Lee (1990) “General and Specific Measures of Public Attitudes toward Sentencing,” 22 Canadian J. of Behavioural Science 327–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimring, Frank, & Hawkins, Gordon (1995) “Is American Violence a Crime Problem?” Presented at California Policy Seminar Meeting, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Zimring, Franklin E., Hawkins, Gordon, & Ibser, Hank (1995) Estimating the Effect of Increased Incarceration on Crime in California. Berkeley: California Policy Seminar.Google Scholar