Progress in linguistics: a collection of papers. Selected and edited by Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Erich Heidolph. (Janua linguarum, series maior, 43.) The Hague: Mouton, 1970. Pp. 344. | Language | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

References

Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2.119–127.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1968. Remarks on nominalization. Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. by Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P. S., 184–221. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph (ed.) 1966. Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 1970. On the semantics of complement sentences. Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 328–339.Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 1971a. Implicative verbs. Lg. 47.340–358.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1972a. Linguistics and natural logic. Semantics of natural language, ed. by Davidson, D. and Harman, G., 545–665. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1972b. Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 183–228.Google Scholar

Lees, R. B. 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1968. The role of semantics in a grammar. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by Bach, E. and Harms, R. T., 125–170. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar

Zimmer, Karl. 1971. Some general observations about nominal compounds. Working papers on language universals, Stanford University, vol. 5.Google Scholar