The Black English Semi-Auxiliary Come | Language | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Black English has, in addition to the motion verb come, a come which expresses only speaker indignation. To some extent it shares grammatical properties with auxiliary verbs. Typically, it occurs in utterances that can be taken as identical to ones occurring in non-Black dialects; and it is apparently for this reason that it has remained undetected. The existence of this come indicates that an even greater difference exists between Black and White speech than previously thought. It is also of interest that the semi-auxiliary come occurs even in acrolectal varieties of Black English. This reveals that the postcreole continuum in the United States differs from that in Guyana as described by Bickerton 1975, who states that forms which are identical to ones in the base language, but functionally distinct, are not part of the acrolect.

References

Akmajian, Adrian, Steele, Susan; and Wasow, Thomas. 1979. The category aux in universal grammar. LI 10.1–64.Google Scholar

Bailey, Beryl. 1966. Jamaican Creole syntax. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1974. Creolization, linguistic universals, natural semantax and the brain. Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Hawaii, 6:3.125–41.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1975. Dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1976. Pidgin and creole studies. Annual Review of Anthropology 5.169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. The _Go_-progressive and auxiliary-formation, MS.Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. 1974. Normal states and evaluative viewpoints. Lg. 50.316–32.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Irma Aloyce E. 1970. A syntactic analysis of Sea Island Creole (Gullah). University of Michigan dissertation.Google Scholar

Fasold, Ralph. 1972. Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. (Urban language series, 8.) Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1978. Dialect and conversational inference in urban communication. Language in Society 7.393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. [Reprinted in his Selected writings, 2.130–47. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.]Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Where do grammars stop? Report of the 23rd Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, ed. by Shuy, Roger W., 43–88. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1980. Is there a creole speech community? Theoretical orientations in creole studies, ed. by Valdman, Albert & Highfield, Arnold, 369–88. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William, et al. 1968. A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto-Rican speakers in New York City, volume I. (Final report, US Office of Education, Coöperative research project no. 3288.) New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 1974. Review of Tense marking in Black English, by Fasold, Ralph. Lg. 50.758–62.Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1975. The category status of English modals. Foundations of Language 12.597–601.Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey. 1974. Restating doubl-ing. Glossa 8.109–20.Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey, and Wilson, Deirdre. 1977. Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries. Lg. 53.741–88.Google Scholar

Rickford, John R. 1977. The question of prior creolization in Black English. Pidgin and creole linguistics, ed. by Valdman, Albert, 190–221. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Rickford, John R. 1979. Variation in a creole continuum: Quantitative and implicational approaches. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar

Spears, Arthur K. 1974. On the notion occasion and the analysis of aspect. CLS 10.672–83.Google Scholar

Spears, Arthur K. 1977. The semantics of English complementation. San Diego: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar

Spears, Arthur K. 1980. The other come in Black English. (Working papers in sociolinguistics, 77.) Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar

Taylor, Orlando. 1971. Response to Social dialects and the field of speech, by Williams, F. Sociolinguistics: A crossdisciplinary perspective, ed. by Shuy, Roger W., 13–20. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1978. On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. Universais of human language, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H. et al., 3.369–400. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar

Turner, Lorenzo Dow. 1949. Africanisms in the Gullah dialect. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. 1973. Review of Black English: Its history and usage in the United States, by Dillard, J. L. Lg. 49.670–79.Google Scholar