89Zr-Nanocolloidal Albumin–Based PET/CT Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Node Detection in Head and Neck Cancer: Preclinical Results (original) (raw)
Research ArticleBrief Communication
, Gerard W.M. Visser, Marian Baclayon, Wouter H. Roos, Gijs J.L. Wuite, Otto S. Hoekstra, C. René Leemans, Remco de Bree and Guus A.M.S. van Dongen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2011, 52 (10) 1580-1584; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.089557
Abstract
Identifying sentinel nodes near the primary tumor remains a problem in, for example, head and neck cancer because of the limited resolution of current lymphoscintigraphic imaging when using 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin. This study describes the development and evaluation of a nanocolloidal albumin–based tracer specifically dedicated for high-resolution PET detection. Methods: 89Zr was coupled to nanocolloidal albumin via the bifunctional chelate _p_-isothiocyanatobenzyldesferrioxamine B. Quality control tests, including particle size measurements, and in vivo biodistribution and imaging experiments in a rabbit lymphogenic metastasis model were performed. Results: Coupling of 89Zr to nanocolloidal albumin appeared to be efficient, resulting in a stable product with a radiochemical purity greater than 95%, without affecting the particle size. PET showed distinguished uptake of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin in the sentinel nodes, with visualization of lymphatic vessels, and with a biodistribution comparable to 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin. Conclusion: 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin is a promising tracer for sentinel node detection by PET.
The sentinel node (SN) procedure is applied in a variety of tumor types, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (1,2). Although, in general, results in HNSCC are good, adequate detection of the SN in floor-of-mouth tumors, compared with other sites, appeared problematic, as illustrated by significantly lower sensitivity and negative predictive value (1). This is probably due to the short distance between the primary tumor and the first draining lymph nodes (SNs) in combination with the limited resolution of planar lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT. The injection site (around the primary tumor) produces a large focus of intense activity on planar lymphoscintigraphy, possibly hiding SNs near the primary tumor. As a result, second-echelon lymph nodes may erroneously be considered SNs; this is also true for SPECT: the added value of detecting foci hidden at planar scintigraphy may be offset by its lack of dynamic information with the typically fast kinetics of lymph drainage in HNSCC.
PET provides dynamic 3-dimensional information at a higher spatial resolution than achievable with a γ-camera. Theoretically, these characteristics may better differentiate between the first- and second-echelon nodes. To the best of our knowledge, no PET radiocolloids specifically dedicated to lymphatic mapping are clinically available yet. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate in a rabbit lymphogenic metastasis model a 89Zr (half-life, 78 h)-nanocolloidal albumin (Nanocoll; GE Healthcare)–based PET radiocolloid dedicated to SN detection. Results were compared with 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin (99mTc half-life, 6 h).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of 89Zr- and 99mTc-Nanocolloidal Albumin
A 0.5-mg kit for the labeling of colloidal human serum albumin with 99mTc was premodified with _p_-isothiocyanatobenzyldesferrioxamine B (Df-Bz-NCS [Macrocyclics]) and labeled with 89Zr (IBA Molecular) essentially according to the protocol in Table 1. 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin was prepared according to the manufacturer's information (3).
TABLE 1.
Labeling Protocol of 89Zr-Nanocolloidal Albumin
Analysis
Labeling kinetics and radiochemical purity were determined by instant thin-layer chromatography using silica gel–impregnated glass fiber sheets (Gelman Sciences). For instant thin-layer chromatography analysis of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin, citrate buffer (20 mmol/L, pH 5.0) with 10% acetonitrile was used as the mobile phase. For 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin, the mobile phase was methanol:water (85:15 v/v). Rf values were 0–0.1 for 89Zr/99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin and 0.7–1.0 for free 89Zr/99mTc.
For comparison of the particle size of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin and 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin, both colloids were analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM), a single-particle technique that has successfully been used to characterize a wide variety of nanometer-sized proteinaceous assemblies (4–6). In addition, native nanocolloidal albumin in polysorbate-citrate buffer, pH 6.5, diluted to a concentration of 0.10 mg/mL, was included in this analysis to determine whether the modification of nanocolloidal albumin with Df-Bz-NCS and subsequent labeling with 89Zr altered the particle size of the colloids. The atomic force microscope (Nanotec Electronica) was operated in jumping mode, and all experiments were performed in liquid. Rectangular cantilevers (RC800PSA; Olympus) with a nominal tip radius of 20 nm and spring constant of 0.05 N/m were used to image the colloid particles. Colloid samples were deposited on a freshly cleaved mica substrate and incubated for 10 min before they were analyzed by AFM. Height measurements on the immobilized particles were performed in an automated way (home-written program in LabView; National Instruments) to obtain the particle size distribution.
Rabbit VX2 Auricle Carcinoma Model
Female rabbits (HsdIf:NZW; Harlan Laboratories) bearing auricular VX2 carcinoma (Fig. 1) were used for in vivo evaluation of radiocolloids (7–9). VX2 tumor cells were kindly provided by Dr. Robert J.J. van Es (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht), and tumors were induced by injection of 0.15–0.25 mL containing 25–30 × 106 VX2 tumor cells in both ears. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with Dutch animal welfare regulations and Dutch national law (“Wet op de dierproeven,” Stb 1985, 336).
FIGURE 1.
Rabbit VX2 auricular carcinoma model. This animal model is attractive for evaluating SN detection procedures in HNSCC, because after inoculation of tumor cells into ear, arising tumors (T) tend to metastasize lymphatically. First lymph node that will be metastatically involved within about 21 d, SN, is parotid lymph node (1). Caudal mandibular lymph nodes (2) are second-echelon lymph nodes in this model. Consistent lymphogenic metastatic spread of tumor and accessibility of lymph nodes for surgery makes this a suitable model for evaluation of SN detection. a = angle of mandible.
Imaging Experiments
Administration of radiocolloids occurred always via 3–4 peritumoral subcutaneous injections of 0.15–0.25 mL each. To evaluate the distribution of 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin in the auricular VX2 carcinoma model, 4 tumor-bearing rabbits were unilaterally imaged using a γ-camera (e.cam dual-detector camera; Siemens Medical Solutions). Dynamic imaging was started immediately after injection of 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin (5–10 MBq) and consisted of 10 frames of 1 min. Static images were acquired at 10 min after injection.
PET (HRRT PET scanner; Siemens/CTI) (10) or PET/CT (Gemini TF64; Philips) (11) was performed on 6 rabbits with tumors in both ears (n = 12). Two animals received only 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin (5 MBq), and the other 4 rabbits were injected with a mixture of 89Zr- and 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin (5–10 MBq each). Coinjection with 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin was performed to allow for comparative biodistribution studies. No substantial interference of 99mTc during PET was anticipated. Dynamic imaging was started immediately after injection and consisted of a 1-h scan sorted into 26 frames (12 × 5 s, 4 × 15 s, 3 × 60 s, 4 × 150 s, and 3 × 900 s).
Biodistribution Study
To compare the biodistribution of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin with the reference 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin, both radiocolloids were coinjected around 12 tumors in 6 rabbits. Two animals were euthanized 30 min after coinjection of the radiocolloids, without PET, and the other 4 animals were euthanized after the imaging experiments were finished—that is, at 1 and 3 h after injection. After preparation of a skin flap, enlarged parotid and caudal mandibular lymph nodes were identified and harvested bilaterally. Besides the lymph nodes, the following nonlymphatic tissues were removed: skin and muscle from the hind limb, heart, lung, liver, spleen, and sternum. Blood was also collected. After weighing, radioactivity in each sample was assessed in a γ-counter (Wallac), using the corresponding window settings for 99mTc and 89Zr (for the 140- and 909-keV γ-energy, respectively). In this dual-isotope measurement, corrections for crossover from 89Zr into the 99mTc window were performed using a standard of each radionuclide. Radioactivity uptake was calculated as the percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g), corrected for radioactive decay.
Statistics
The square of Pearson correlation coefficient r (R2, determined using Excel [Microsoft]) was used to study the correlation between tissue uptake of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin and 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin.
RESULTS
Radiolabeling
Labeling of premodified nanocolloidal albumin (180 μg) with 89Zr proved reproducible, with an overall labeling yield of 70%–75%. After PD10 purification, radiochemical purity always exceeded 95% and remained stable on storage for at least 24 h. Labeling of native nanocolloidal albumin, that is, without premodification with the Df-Bz-NCS chelate, showed less than 1% labeling. Labeling of nanocolloidal albumin with 99mTc resulted in a labeling yield and radiochemical purity greater than 95%. The plots of the particle size distribution are shown in Figure 2. The average size of the 89Zr- nanocolloidal albumin particles was 12.7 ± 0.6 nm; for 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin, this was 14.9 ± 0.5 nm, and for native nanocolloidal albumin, 13.8 ± 0.8 nm.
FIGURE 2.
Size distribution of 89Zr-labeled, 99mTc-labeled, and unlabeled (native) nanocolloidal albumin particles as assessed by AFM imaging. Number of analyzed particles for 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin was 112; for 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin, 167; and for native nanocolloidal albumin, 95. AFM measures height of particle, which is representative measure for particle size.
Imaging Studies
In all tumors injected with either 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin or 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin, drainage occurred rather fast: within 5 min after injection, 2 foci of intense activity were already visible on planar lymphoscintigraphy (Fig. 3A) and on PET images (Fig. 3B), their localizations corresponding to the parotid and caudal mandibular lymph nodes. As could be seen on dynamic images, the parotid lymph node indeed appeared to be the first draining lymph node and was best demonstrated by PET because with this technique, 3-dimensional images providing high-resolution visualization of connecting lymphatic vessels are acquired (Fig. 4). No other lymph nodes were visualized on any of the images. On all images, a slight uptake of radioactivity in the liver and spleen, explained by the known catabolic route of nanocolloidal albumin, was observed (3).
FIGURE 3.
(A) Static planar lymphoscintigraphy image (10 min after injection of 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin). (B) PET image (15 min after injection of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin). In this slide, contralateral injection site (*) is also visible. On both images, parotid lymph node (large arrow) and caudal mandibular lymph node (small arrow) are clearly visible. i = injection site; L = liver.
FIGURE 4.
(A) PET/CT image 30 min after injection (i) of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin. (B) Dynamic PET images after injection of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin around left ear tumor. Afferent (a) and efferent (e) lymphatic vessels are clearly visible in time, allowing identification of true SN. Contralateral injection site (*) with draining lymphatic vessel, which was injected earlier, is also visible in this slide. Uptake of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin in sentinel lymph node (large arrow) and second-echelon lymph node (small arrow) is clearly visible on both images.
Biodistribution Studies
Results of tissue uptake of 99mTc- and 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin are presented in Table 2. Uptake in the lymph nodes was similar, ranging from 0.2 to 58.6 %ID/g and 0.2 to 60.2 %ID/g for 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin and 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin, respectively, with a Pearson correlation coefficient r of 0.975 (R2 = 0.95). Low uptake of both radiocolloids was observed in nonlymphatic tissues, with some isotope-specific differences.
TABLE 2.
Tissue Uptake of 99mTc- and 89Zr-Nanocolloidal Albumin
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we describe a method for efficient and inert labeling of nanocolloidal albumin with 89Zr using the bifunctional desferal chelate Df-Bz-NCS, which was previously introduced for the coupling of 89Zr to intact monoclonal antibodies (12,13). Stable 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin radiocolloid was produced using this method. The developed labeling conditions did not affect the particle size, an important parameter that mainly determines kinetics and lymphatic uptake of the radiocolloid (14). In addition, uptake of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin in the draining lymph nodes as observed in PET and biodistribution experiments was fully consistent with 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin uptake.
For the premodification of nanocolloidal albumin, an important factor appeared to be the pH, which should be greater than 6.0 to avoid precipitation of the colloid. For this reason, the tetrafluorophenol-_N_-succinyldesferal (TFP-_N_-sucDf) chelate, which has been used for coupling of 89Zr to proteins before, could not be used (15). The TFP-_N_-sucDf route requires a step at pH 4.0 to remove stable iron (Fe[III]) from the temporarily filled Df chelate and therefore appeared unsuitable for nanocolloidal albumin. The Df-Bz-NCS chelate, however, allows a simple labeling procedure consisting of premodification of nanocolloidal albumin at a pH of 9.0, labeling of Df-Bz-NCS-nanocolloidal albumin with 89Zr at a pH of 7.0, and storage of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin in polysorbate-citrate buffer at a pH of 6.5. No difficulties were observed with respect to precipitation of nanocolloidal albumin following this route, and 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin with a radiochemical purity greater than 95% can be produced.
With the introduction of SPECT/CT, functional and anatomic information has become available at the same time. In general, more SNs are identified by SPECT/CT than by planar lymphoscintigraphy (16–20). However, it may remain difficult or impossible to establish which are true SNs rather than second-echelon ones. The ultimate proof of whether a focus is an SN is visualization of an afferent lymphatic vessel. Hence if more than 1 lymph node is labeled, dynamic imaging is required for interpretation, as is feasible with PET (Fig. 4). With respect to the identification of SNs adjacent to the primary tumor, that is, floor-of-mouth tumors, the additional value of SPECT/CT seemed to be limited (20). It remains to be shown whether the spatial resolution of PET will indeed improve the feasibility of SN detection in floor-of-mouth tumors.
Because nanocolloidal albumin is widely accepted for human use, and the developed 89Zr-labeling procedure is compliant with good manufacturing practices, starting clinical studies with 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin should be easy. The use of a radionuclide with a long half-life could be justified by the low amount of radioactivity (i.e., ∼5 MBq) that is needed to obtain satisfactory imaging results. This 5 MBq of 89Zr corresponds to an effective dose equivalent of 0.15 mSv, whereas the effective dose is 0.44 mSv for the 110 MBq of 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin that is normally used for SN detection.
CONCLUSION
This study describes the production and preclinical evaluation of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin, a PET tracer specifically dedicated to lymphoscintigraphy by PET/CT. No differences were observed between 89Zr- and 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin regarding radiochemical purity, particle size, SN detection by imaging, and uptake in the regional lymph nodes, indicating the inertness of coupling of 89Zr to nanocolloidal albumin. These results justify evaluation of 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin in a clinical setting.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Tobias Murthum and Prof. Jochen Werner (Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Marburg, Germany) for their assistance during set-up of the animal model. Furthermore, we thank Klaas-Walter Meijer, Jerry Middelberg, and Paul Sinnige of the animal facility at the VU University Medical Center and Marijke Stigter-van Walsum (Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center) for their excellent support in the performance of the animal experiments and Inge De Greeuw, Mariska Verlaan, and Dr. Carla Molthoff (Nuclear Medicine and PET Research, VU University Medical Center) for PET analysis. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Footnotes
Published online Sep. 2, 2011.
© 2011 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
REFERENCES
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
GE Healthcare. Summary of Product Characteristics Nanocoll. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: GE Healthcare; August 2010. - 4.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 20.↵
- Received for publication February 21, 2011.
- Accepted for publication June 22, 2011.