Origin and Age Determination of the Neotethys Meliata Basin Ophiolite Fragments in the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Accretionary Wedge Mélange (Inner Western Carpathians, Slovakia) (original) (raw)

Author / Affiliation / Email

/ajax/scifeed/subscribe

Font Type:

Arial Georgia Verdana

Open AccessArticle

Marián Putiš

1,*,

Ján Soták

Qiu-Li Li

Martin Ondrejka

Xian-Hua Li

Zhaochu Hu

Xiaoxiao Ling

Ondrej Nemec

Zoltán Németh

5 and

Peter Ružička

Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia

Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 974 11 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr, 817 04 Bratislava, Slovakia

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Submission received: 1 July 2019 /Revised: 8 October 2019 /Accepted: 19 October 2019 /Published: 23 October 2019

Abstract

This study reports the Neotethyan Meliata Basin ophiolite fragments in the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous accretionary wedge mélange in the southern part of the Inner Western Carpathians (IWC). Here we present new lithostratigraphical, petrographical, geochemical, and geochronological data obtained from the mélange blocks used to reconstruct the Meliaticum paleotectonic zones in a tentative evolutionary model of this accretionary wedge. The Dobšiná mélange block continental margin carbonatic and siliciclastic sediments have calc-alkaline basalt intercalations. The basalt Concordia age dated to 245.5 ± 3.3 Ma by U–Pb SIMS on zircon most likely indicates the pre-oceanic advanced early Middle Triassic continental rifting stage. The evolving marginal oceanic crust is composed of Middle to Upper Triassic cherty shales to radiolarites. The detrital zircon U–Pb SIMS Concordia ages of 247 ± 4 Ma and 243 ± 4 Ma from a cherty shale, and the xenocryst zircon population Concordia age of 266 ± 3 Ma from a 0.5 m thick “normal” mid-ocean ridge (N-MOR) basalt layer in this cherty shale reveal the connection of the oceanic basin to the adjacent rifting continental margin. The chertified reddish limestone transition to radiolarite indicates syn-rift basin deepening. Upwards, regular alternating N-MOR basalts and radiolarites are often disturbed by peperite breccia horizons. The Nd isotope values of these basalts (εNd240 = 7–8) are consistent with their chondrite normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns and indicate a depleted mantle source. The Triassic ophiolitic suite also comprises rare ocean island (OI) basalts (εNd240 = 5) and serpentinized subduction unrelated peridotites. The Middle to Late Jurassic shortening and southward intra-oceanic and continental margin subduction at approximately 170–150 Ma enhanced the formation of the trench-like Jurassic flysch succession which preceded the closure of the Meliata Basin. The flysch sediments form a mélange matrix of olistolithic unsubducted, obducted, and MP–HP/LT metamorphosed exhumed blocks of the Triassic to Lower Jurassic successions. Blocks of peridotites, rodingites, blueschists, greenschists, rare amphibolites, deep-water shaly sediments and shallow- to deep-water carbonates are typical members of the mélange. The Meliatic accretionary wedge mélange nappe outliers were incorporated in the IWC orogenic wedge in the late Early Cretaceous according to metamorphic rutile U–Pb SIMS ages of 100 ± 10 Ma determined from a Jaklovce metabasalt.

1. Introduction

The Middle Triassic–Late Jurassic oceanic Meliata Basin is part of the Neotethys Ocean [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Meliaticum of the Inner Western Carpathians (IWC; Figure 1) originated in a NW Neotethys oceanic and continental margin thus representing northern branch of this ocean. Paleogeographic schemes show that this Tethyan ocean formed the embayment between the Eurasian and Gondwanian parts of Pangea [6,10,11,12,13,14]. Some authors place the Meliata Basin as a back-arc basin (BAB) on the Late Permian rifted Eurasian active continental margin above a Paleotethys subduction zone [12,15,16,17], but others consider it formed during the rifting of the Neotethys passive continental margin [10].

The IWC south of the Outer Western Carpathians Flysch Belt (OWC-FB) and the Pieniny Klippen Belt (PKB) comprise basement–cover complexes included in a north-vergency fold and thrust system (Figure 1). These are further subdivided from north to south and bottom to top into the Infratatric, Tatric, Veporic, and Gemeric tectonic zones, separated by major Cretaceous shear zones [19,20,21,22,23]. The Meliata Superunit occurs as relatively small km-scale blocks or the north-vergency nappe outliers overlying the Gemeric and southern part of the Veporic superunits which are inferred to have been part of the northern continental margin of the Middle Triassic to early Late Jurassic oceanic Meliata Basin [8,23]. The Pelso Superunit [6,11,24,25] could be an opposite southern continental margin of the western Neotethys embayment [8]). The Meliatic nappe outliers overlie the IWC orogenic wedge and are overlain in turn by the Turňa and Silica nappes [23].

The Meliaticum was reported to be an incomplete ophiolite suite composed of mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORBs) and serpentinized peridotites associated with Middle Triassic pelagic carbonatic and cherty sediments [1,3,4,26,27]. The Permian to Middle Triassic continental margin sediments are associated with calc-alkaline basalts [5], and some of these underwent subduction metamorphism up to the blueschist facies [28,29,30] and became part of an accretionary wedge mélange with the unmetamorphosed to lowest anchimetamorphosed Jurassic trench-like flysch sediments [8]. The Tornakápolna series of the Rudabánya Hills in northern Hungary (“Bódva Valley Ofiolite complex”) is considered to be as the mid-Triassic equivalent of the Meliata Unit in Slovak IWC [6,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. The Bodva-Telekesvölgy Triassic–Middle Jurassic succession is overthrust there by Torna Series (Torna/Turňa Nappe) and by the Telekesoldal Jurassic sediments and Jurassic ophiolites. These ophiolites are equivalent of the Szarvaskö ophiolites in the Telekesoldal and Mónosbél nappes [37,38,39]. Meliatic type Triassic successions emplaced in Permian evaporitic mélange were discovered also in the Northern Calcareous Alps in Austria [3,40,41,42].

Herein, we reconstruct the evolutionary stages of the Meliata Basin from the investigated dismembered Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous mélange blocks exposed in the IWC in order to test the formation of a marginal basin accretionary wedge. The major aim of this work is to define the principal paleotectonic zones of this basin, the rocks of which supplied the Meliatic accretionary wedge mélange, with focusing on the ophiolitic remnants. The research methods in Chapter 3 then record the following applied investigations: A detailed field study of chosen lithological cross-sections, microscopic petrography, EPMA, XRF, ICP–OES, ICP–MS, TIMS, and SIMS U–Pb zircon and rutile dating. These determined the mineral chemical composition, the whole-rock chemistry including REE and Nd isotopes and detrital or xenocryst zircon isotopic ages. Finally, we employed biostratigraphic research of the inferred Middle Triassic cherty shales to radiolarites associated with basalts in a key Jaklovce cross-section and inferred Jurassic calcareous shales at Dobšiná.

Abbreviations of rock-forming minerals names used in the text, tables and figures are: Ab—albite, Act—actinolite, Amp—amphibole, Ap—apatite, Cal—calcite, Cel—celadonite, Chl—chlorite, Cpx—clinopyroxene, Czo—clinozoisite, Dol—dolomite, Ed—edenite, Ep—epidote, Gl—glaucophane, Grt—garnet, Hbl—hornblende, H-Grs—hydro-grossular, H-Adr—hydro-andradite, Jd—jadeite, Kfs—potassium feldspar, Mag—magnetite, Mnz—monazite, Ms—muscovite, Cel-Ms—celadonite-rich Ms, Pg—pargasite, Phg—phengite (~Cel-Ms), Pl—plagioclase, Prg—pargasite, Prv—perovskite, Qz—quartz, Rbk—riebeckite, Rt—rutile, Spl—spinel, Tlc—talc, Tr—tremolite, Ttn—titanite, Tur—tourmaline, WhM—white mica, Win—winchite, Zrn—zircon.

2. Geological Setting

Geological maps [43,44] show that the Meliatic nappe outliers mostly overlie the Permian–Lower Triassic sedimentary cover of the IWC Gemeric Superunit (Figure 2). The Gemeric pre-Alpine basement preserves a Carboniferous suture after the closure of the Devonian part of the Paleotethys Ocean [21,45,46,47,48], and the suture zone is marked by thick Lower to Upper Carboniferous complexes including mélange blocks of the exhumed MP to HP basement rocks [49,50]. The Neotethyan Meliaticum thus overlies such a suture marked by the Devonian N-MORBs of the Gemeric basement Klátov Group [48]. The Variscan Gemeric basement partly resembles the basement complexes of the Noric terrane in the Transdanubian Range, Dinarides, and Southern Alps [51,52].

The evolution of the Meliata Basin was preceded by the Permian to Early Triassic continental rifting stage. This time period is consistent with the Pangea super-continent break-up [12,15,16,17], and almost all the IWC units bear the signatures of this global extension event by distinct Permian magmatic activity. Calc-alkaline to alkaline acidic to basic volcanics, subvolcanics, lamprophyres, and some plutonic rocks were dated as Permian in the Infratatric [53], Tatric [54], Veporic [47,55,56], Gemeric [57,58,59], Meliatic [58], and Silicic [60] superunits. Typical intra-plate continental tholeiites occur in a Permian succession of the Hronic Nappe [61] overlying the IWC Fatric, Tatric, and Infratatric nappes (Figure 1).

The Triassic–Jurassic oceanic crust fragments occur only in the Meliatic Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous mélange dismembered throughout the Gemericum. The Gemeric Superunit comprises Early Paleozoic basement complexes with the Carboniferous and Permian and subordinate Mesozoic cover rocks [62]. The Meliatic nappe outliers are overlain by the Turňa (in Slovakia)/Torna (in Hungary) Nappe [34,63,64], and the Turnaicum is composed of very low-grade to low-grade Upper Carboniferous, Permian, and Lower Triassic clastic sequences, lower Anisian platform carbonates and upper Anisian to Upper Triassic pelagic limestones and shales. These are partly imbricated with the underlying Meliatic complexes [34,40,63,65]. The uppermost tectonostratigraphic unit is the Silica Nappe [6,66] composed of Triassic–Jurassic successions, and this nappe system continues in the Aggtelek–Rudabánya Hills north of the Bükk Mountains and the Darnó line in Hungary [34].

The Meliatic nappe outliers include shallow-water platformal Steinalm-type (Honce) carbonates of Anisian age and are followed upwardly by Ladinian and Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic siliceous carbonates, with their age determined by conodonts [4]. The reddish (Žarnov) limestones of upper Anisian age are often present as neptunic dykes in pale platformal carbonates and these indicate the platform break-up and the Meliata Basin syn-rift stage [2,4]. A high five to seven color alteration index of conodonts is compatible with their marble character [67]. This succession at the Jaklovce village and nearby Kurtova skala Hill was classified as a mega-olistolith [2] in the Middle Jurassic deep-water shaly matrix, thus forming a Jurassic olistostroma [30]. Triassic age of the reddish radiolarites was first determined by [68] at the Držkovce and Bohúňovo localities and later confirmed here by [69]. The Middle to early Late Jurassic (Bajocian to Oxfordian) radiolarians in pelagic shales were documented by [4]. Basic geochemical (whole-rock) data from the basalts of chosen localities were published by [4,5,27].

Pelagic sedimentation continued until the early Late Jurassic [4] and was followed by S-ward subduction of the oceanic and adjoining continental crust. The Jurassic sediments, termed “flysch” [4,8]), may contain Triassic olistoliths forming Jurassic olistostromes. These were reported from the Meliata Unit s.s. in the Meliata and Jaklovce village areas [2,4,64], but the sediments also contain the HP to MP metamorphosed blocks of the Triassic successions at the Dobšiná and Jaklovce localities [8,70,71,72,73].

The Meliatic blocks and fragments of different (km–cm) size have major lithology and metamorphic overprinting grade differences and these currently remain subdivided into (i) a subducted part, metamorphosed at HP–MP/LT conditions and termed the Bôrka Nappe [8,29,30,74,75,76], and (ii) unsubducted fragments with only very low-grade metamorphic overprinting, termed the Meliata Unit s.s. according to the type locality at the Meliata village [1,2,4,8,30,64,76,77].

The Bôrka Nappe blueschist facies metabasalts associated with Rožňava Zone Triassic marbles exhibit intra-plate affinity [5,29], and continental arc basalts were also reported here by these authors. This situation imposes the Bôrka Nappe as a subducted Meliata Basin continental margin with deeper shelf to slope facies on the inferred Gemeric-type basement. The estimated HP/LT metamorphic conditions are approximately 350–450 °C at 900–1200 MPa [29,78,79]. The timing of the ocean closure and subduction of the attenuated continental and inferred oceanic crust in the Late Jurassic is constrained to 160–150 Ma by 40Ar–39Ar [80,81,82,83,84] and K–Ar 155–152 Ma ages [84] of “phengitic” white micas from blueschists.

The Meliata Unit s.s. (defined at the Meliata village by [2]) is a Middle Jurassic deep-water turbiditic succession interlayered with radiolarites [85]. It contains fragments of the Triassic continental margin carbonates and rare inferred oceanic crust radiolarites [85]. Basalts are also uncommon there because only one fragment has currently been identified [64]). The whole unit has weak metamorphic overprinting at 257–312 °C/350–540 MPa and relatively younger metamorphic ages than the Bôrka Nappe at 150–115 Ma [40,80,81,82,83,84]. The Jurassic olistostromes of the Meliata Unit s.s. were drilled in borehole BRU-1 in the core of the “Brusník Anticline” in the southern part of the Slovenské Rudohorie Mts. [63], and this borehole confirmed tectonic position of the Turňa Nappe on the Meliata Unit s.s. The tectonic basement of the Meliata Unit s.s. was most likely formed by the Middle to Upper Triassic pale marbles of Honce-type limestones and some schistose limestones with basalts and basaltic tuff layers of the Dúbrava or Hačava formations [86] incorporated into the Bôrka Nappe. The high-T anchi-zone at 200–350 °C and 200–350 MPa was reported from the overlying Torna/Turňa Nappe [87].

Amphibole gabbros to dolerites and serpentinites are embedded in the Silicic Nappe Permian salinar formation near Gemerská Hôrka and Bohúňovo villages and similar fragments have also been identified in the Perkupa Formation in northern Hungary at the sole of the Silica Nappe [34]. In addition, Meliatic type deep-water Triassic successions occur in Permian evaporitic mélange at the base of the higher Mesozoic nappes of the Northern Calcareous Alps in Austria [3,41,42].

The very low-temperature thermo-chronological data at <180 °C from the Meliaticum [8] constrained the final exhumation and cooling history of the Meliatic accretionary wedge fragments to approximately 130–100 Ma by zircon (U–Th)/He (ZHe) dating. The youngest ZHe ages of 80–65 Ma obtained from the Meliatic Jaklovce fragment and the underlying Gemericum are post-thrust- or post-nappe-formation ages. These ages conform to the post-collisional zircon fission track (ZFT) ages of 88 to 62 Ma from the Gemeric and Veporic tectonic units [88,89]. The oldest apatite (U–Th)/He (AHe) age of ca. 63 Ma obtained from rodingite at Dobšiná may indicate cooling of the Meliatic fragments within the IWC orogenic wedge below approximately 70 °C [8]. This age is consistent with the apatite FT ages of 63–55 Ma and AHe ages of 62–31 Ma from the southern Veporicum [89].

Serpentinized ultramafic bodies of the Meliaticum were reported by [26]. Their genetic aspects were published by [7,90,91,92], who assigned them to the abyssal peridotites.

The HP mélange blocks are embedded in serpentinitic sandy matrix and finally tectonically mixed with the unmetamorphosed to anchimetamorphosed Jurassic flysch sediments at Dobšiná [8]. The 135 Ma U–Pb SIMS [92] and LA–ICP–MS [73] age of metamorphic–metasomatic Prv (εNd135 = −8) in serpentinized abyssal harzburgites [93,94] and rodingites and the whole-rock and mineral trace element study [90] constrain the interaction of these ultramafics with the Meliatic accretionary wedge fluids.

While our review of published results documents that geologists previously concentrated on the Meliata Unit s.s. and the Bôrka Nappe, herein we continue our research around Dobšiná town and Jaklovce village because these provide new information on the complicated mélange structure. We focused on the mélange blocks’ rock composition to reconstruct the main Meliatic paleotectonic zones from the mélange sources, with the respect to geochemical, biochronological, and geochronological constraints. We also performed comparative studies with other Meliatic localities, including Malý Radzim at Brdárka, Meliata, Bretka, Čoltovo, Hačava, and Šugov Valley, with emphasis on inferred oceanic crust fragments which are typical neither for the Meliata Unit s.s. nor the Bôrka Unit, but typical of the newly-defined Jaklovce Unit. The types of the mélange matrix and the metamorphic overprinting signatures of both the mélange blocks and the Jurassic sedimentary matrix are then addressed and the obtained dataset was used to outline a tentative evolutionary model of Meliaticum.

3. Research Methods

This paper summarizes results from detailed field studies of the chosen lithological cross-sections performed to determine the mélange rock-composition, whole-rock chemical compositions including REE and Nd isotopic determinations, and also to assess the Zrn and Rt isotopic age data from the Meliatic mélange blocks.

The field investigation was focused on lithologically variable inferred continental margin and/or oceanic Middle Triassic to Lower Jurassic fragments associated with the Jurassic flysch sediments in the mélange. The mineral composition and textures of the studied basalts and related sedimentary rocks were investigated in polished sections by polarized light microscope. The mineral element compositions were measured by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) on a Cameca SX–100 electron microprobe at the State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr in Bratislava, and by JEOL Super-probe JXA 8100 at the Earth Science Institute of Slovak Academy of Sciences in Banská Bystrica (Slovakia). The petrographic rock description is based on our previously published mineral chemical composition and classification data [7,72], further literature data [29,79], and our new, so far unpublished data available in Supplementary Figures S1–S4 and Tables S1 and S2.

The pulp samples were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for major elements, and the trace and rare earth elements (REE) were determined in ACME Laboratories Ltd. in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Instruments for inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP–OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) were used for whole-rock (including REE) geochemical analyses (acmelab.com/services/general-conditions-of-service/).

The Zrn and Rt crystal samples were mounted in a transparent epoxy and polished to expose the interior of the crystals, and mounts were coated with high-purity gold to reach <20 Ω resistance prior to analysis. High-quality images of Zrn and Rt crystals under translucent and reflective light and Scanning Electron Microscope Cathodoluminiscence (SEM-CL) images were available for spot choice to avoid fractures and inclusions. Measurements of U, Th, and Pb isotopes in Zrn and Rt were made by Cameca IMS-1280HR SIMS at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, China. The complete instrument description and analytical procedure for zircon are described in [95], for rutile in [96].

The primary beam of O2− was accelerated at 13 kV and focused to an ellipsoidal spot of approximately 20 by 30 μm in size. Positive secondary ions were extracted with a 10kV potential. A mass resolution of approximately 5400 defined at 10% peak height separated Pb+ peaks from isobaric interference. A single electron multiplier in ion-counting mode measured secondary ion beam intensities by peak jumping mode. For zircon, Pb/U calibration was performed relative to the Plešovice Zrn standard (206Pb/238U age = 337 Ma, [97]), and U and Th concentrations were calibrated against Zrn standard 91500 (Th = 29 ppm, and U = 81 ppm, [98]). The Qinghu Zrn standard was alternately analyzed as one of the unknowns in order to monitor the external uncertainties. Twenty-two Qinghu Zrn measurements yielded a Concordia age of 160 ± 1 Ma, and this is identical within error with the recommended value of 159.5 ± 0.2 Ma [99]. For rutile, U-Pb ratios and absolute abundances were determined relative to rutile standard DXK [96]. A regression line on the Tera-Wasserburg Plot with total Pb ratios was constructed to calculate the lower intercept as the rutile age. In addition, the analytical uncertainties for the single spot were listed in 1 sigma level, and the quoted Concordia U–Pb ages are within the 95% confidence interval. All Concordia age diagrams were generated by Isoplot/Ex program (Version 2.49, Berkley Geochronology Center, Berkley, CA, USA) [100].

The whole-rock Sm–Nd isotopic ratios were measured by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) at the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, Xi’an, China, and the complete analytical procedure is described in [101]. The Nd isotopic mass fractionation was corrected by the natural 146Nd/144Nd ratios of 0.7219, and the age-corrected 147Sm/144Nd ratios were calculated using the Sm and Nd concentrations obtained by ICP–MS in ACME Laboratories Ltd. in Vancouver, BC, Canada.

The choice of cherty rock samples for biostratigraphic research was based on the examination of thin sections to avoid strongly deformed and recrystallized domains and to find the radiolarian-bearing layers. The metamorphic alteration of these rocks made it very difficult to extract radiolarians despite avoiding metamorphic veins and veilets cross-cutting metacherts. Fifteen samples of cherts and cherty shales were processed to extract radiolarians with the rocks broken to a few centimeter size and soaked in hydrochloric acid. The remaining samples were dissolved in diluted (3%) hydrofluoric acid, and the radiolarians were extracted from the residues and studied by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) for more precise determination. Approximately 180 radiolarian specimens from the Jaklovce samples were studied and their pictures were recorded by SEM.

4. Results—Mélange Block Description

4.1. Mélange Rock-Composition

Two contrasting mélange kilometer-size blocks overlie the Upper Carboniferous or Permian–Lower Triassic cover of the Gemericum in the Dobšiná town area (Figure 3).

Figure 3 and Figure 4 highlight a mélange block composed of lensoidal to almost spherical fragments of serpentinized peridotites, rodingites, blueschists, marbles, and Tlc-Chl-Phg-Cal schists flowing in the soft serpentinitic sandy matrix exposed in a quarry north of Dobšiná town. Part of the blueschist lenses is present in the hosting metasediments, and their contacts are barely recognizable (Figure 5a–c). However, most of the basalt and peridotite bodies are directly in the serpentinic matrix and many have mylonitic to cataclastic deformations (Figure 5d,e). This large serpentinitic mélange block is in tectonic contact with overlying Jurassic calciturbidite deposits (Figure 4).

The second type mélange block occurs S of Dobšiná in the Končistá Hill area. It consists of laminated cherty shales to radiolarites associated with basalts to dolerites (Figure 3, Figure 5f,g).

Further to the S of Dobšiná, below the Malý Radzim Silica Nappe outlier (near Brdárka locality), the blueschists (sample MR-1) associate with rare cherts (Figure 2). The Permian siliciclastics, rhyolitic volcanoclastics, and mid-Triassic marbles in their vicinity are assigned to the Bôrka Nappe [8].

The Jurassic calciclastic deposits (calciturbidites~calcareous flysch) at Dobšiná (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5h) consist of calcareous shaly layers interbedded with carbonatic sandstones. The calciturbidite beds are laminated and contain an admixture of Qz, Ms, Pl/Ab, and rare Tur in sandstone layers.

We then investigated a large mélange block in the Jaklovce village area which has cherty sediments alternating with basalts in tectonic contact with calciturbidites (calcareous flysch), as in Dobšiná (Figure 6). The studied cross-section begins in a railway-cutting north of the Jaklovce village at the Calmit company. This then continues through the village along a main road-cutting to Gelnica to the west or to a forest road-cutting above the main road to the Veľký Folkmár village to the S. Sedimentary bedding and parallel metamorphic schistosity are approximately S-dipping at a medium angle in the exposed northern part of the cross-section depicted in Figure 6.

Our Figure 7a highlights that this cross-section begins with reddish cherty shales with thin cherty carbonate laminas, followed upwardly by a few-meter-thick greenish to reddish schistose cherty shales to massive radiolarites (Figure 7b) with a half-meter thick basalt layer (Figure 7b,c). Pelagic reddish carbonates form a few-decimeter-layer in the western part of the cross-section, and this passes upwardly into cherty carbonates, dark-red cherty clayey-carbonatic shales, and pale-red radiolarites with basaltic tuff layers (Figure 7d). Regularly alternating radiolarites and basalts (Figure 7e,f) are often disturbed by peperitic breccia horizons (Figure 7g) which formed from the interaction of quickly quenching basaltic lava flows and unlithified water-soaked reddish clayey, cherty, and radiolarite sediments. Finally, basaltic lava flow breccias (Figure 7h) interlayered with reddish radiolarites were identified south of the Jaklovce village center above the main road to Veľký Folkmár village.

Serpentinites are an integral part of the mélange, and the largest lens is sandwiched between the top Triassic carbonatic succession of the Kurtova skala Hill and the bottom Jurassic calcareous flysch N of Jaklovce (Figure 6). The rigid, partly detached carbonatic sheet of the Kurtova skala Hill overthrusts the Gemeric Permian volcano-sedimentary and the Lower Triassic siliciclastic cover.

The investigated blocks are tectonically mixed with the Jurassic calcareous flysch formation (Figure 7i) and small metric-size sedimentary matrix exposures are rarely present among the rigid mélange blocks (Figure 6). Although the calcareous flysch sediments lithologically and petrographically closely resemble the Dobšiná marlstones featured in Figure 5, this Jurassic sediment type is different to the dark clayey to cherty shales (siliciclastic flysch) with radiolarites described at the Meliata village [2,3,4,85].

4.2. Biochronology

The Jaklovce mélange block reddish and greenish cherty shales contain siliceous microfauna. The eastern part of the investigated cross-section begins with reddish cherty shales (sample JAK 1/3, Figure 7a) in the Lower Beds of the oceanic Jaklovce Succession. Their radiolarian microfauna is dominated by large-sized spherical spumellarians such as Archaeocenosphaeara sp., Cenosphaera sp., Entactinia sp., and additional indeterminate genera and species. In addition to the simple spumellarians, there are also spine-bearing tests from the following species; Pseudostylosphaera japonica, Pseudostylosphaera cf. coccostyla, Pseudostylosphaera compacta, Capnuchosphaera cf. triassica, Monostylosphaera sp., Muelleritortis cf. cochleata, Muelleritortis firma, Tiborella cf. anisica, and Parasepsagon cf. variabilis (Figure 8, images 1–9). This association indicates a Middle Triassic age of the radiolarites from the Lower Beds of the Jaklovce Succession, and the numerous radiolarians of Muelleritortis and Pseudostylosphaera species imply Ladinian zones (cf. [102,103,104,105]).

The Middle Beds of the oceanic Jaklovce Succession are formed by greenish and reddish cherty shales (s. JAK-1/2, Figure 7b). These beds contain the first (N-MOR) basalt extrusion layer which is approximately 0.5 m thick. Here we found slightly younger late Ladinian to Carnian microfauna with increased nassellarian-type radiolarians. Their association comprises species Corum kraineri, Triassocampe scalaris, Annulotriassocampe sp., Japonocampe sp., Epningium cf. manfredi, Pseudostylosphaera cf. tenuis, and Spongoxystris cf. slovenica (Figure 8, images 10–18).

The Upper Beds of the oceanic Jaklovce Succession have polygenic lithologies of red cherts alternating with (N-MOR) basalts. Cherty clayey-carbonatic shale (sample JAK-2/1; Figure 7c, the middle dark-red layer) contains poorly preserved radiolarians (Figure 8, images 19–23). Although precise determination is difficult, there is a predominance of spherical spumellarians such as Archaeocenosphaera sp., Capnuchosphaera sp., and Entactinia sp. The scarce nassellarian-type radiolarians include tiny conical forms of Triassocampe sp., Annulotriassocampe sp., and Whalenella sp. This association differs from radiolarians of the Lower and Middle Beds through their lack of Ladinian Muelleritortis and Pseudostylosphaera sp. and the inclusion of younger Capnuchosphaeridae and Triassocampidae sp. This is also differentiated by pantanellids which appeared in the late Carnian [106], and therefore the late Carnian (Late Triassic) age for the Upper Beds of the oceanic Jaklovce Succession is constrained.

The Jurassic calciclastic sequence at Dobšiná contains fine-grained sandstone layers with dishlike structures resembling the internal moulds of Posidonia-type bivalves. These fossils may constrain late Early to Middle Jurassic age for this trench-like calcareous flysch succession (Toarcian–Bathonian). In addition, radiolarians in the dark cherty shales from the Meliata locality establish that the entire Jurassic succession terminated in the early Oxfordian [85].

4.3. Petrography and Geochemistry

4.3.1. Dobšiná Area Metabasalts

A mélange block north of Dobšiná town contains Gln-bearing blueschist fragments (Figure 5a–d, Figure 9a,b, Figures S1 and S2; Table S1). The Gln overgrowing Mg-Rbk form part of the peak HP metamorphic assemblage with Tlc, Chl, Phg, Ep, and Jd relics in Ab. A mélange block south of this town contains the MP greenschist-facies metabasalt with Act, Chl, Phg, Ep, Cal, Ttn, and Ab comprising the mineral assemblage (Figure 9c,d, Figures S1 and S2; Table S1). Figure 2 herein depicts a blueschist-facies metabasalt fragment (Figure 9e,f) further south and below the Malý Radzim Hill at Brdárka. Finally, Table 1 identifies the whole-rock geochemical compositions of these metabasalts and Table 2 reveals the Nd isotopic data from different original basalt types.

The blueschist-facies metabasalt of the DOL-1 sample, analogous with DO-16 and 20 samples, has interlayers of Lower/Middle Triassic carbonate-marly sediments incorporated in a mélange block serpentinitic sandy matrix (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5a). These have the highest content of SiO2, Al2O3 and the Na2O, and K2O alkalis and lowest TiO2 and CaO of all investigated metabasalts. In addition, they have abundant Rb, Ba, Ce and La, LILE and also U, Th, and Be, with characteristic negative Eu anomaly and negative εNd250 = −6.41 value (DO-16 sample). This group of metabasalts is characterized by transitional sub-alkaline to alkaline nature with ~0.7 Nb/Y ratio, relatively low 0.02 Zr/TiO2 (Figure 10 [107]) and also low 0.80 to 0.89 TiO2 content and generally high 138–151 ppm Zr. The distribution of other incompatible elements and their concentrations and ratios such as Co (25–26 ppm), Nb/Yb (~6.3), Ta/Yb (0.44–0.52), and Th/Yb (~4.5) indicate that these rocks share affinity with calc-alkaline volcanic arc basalts or slab-distal (fore)back-arc basin basalts (Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14 [108,109,110,111]). The chondrite-normalized REE abundances in this group of volcanic rocks have regularly decreasing patterns from LREE to HREE with (La/Yb)N ratios ranging from 9.8 to 10.9. Finally, the La generally varies from ~158 to ~168 times the chondrite abundance and 53 to 59 times the primitive mantle abundance (Figure 15; cf. Figure S3 with rock/primitive mantle normalization), and the rock’s REE patterns are consistent with calc-alkaline affinity [112,113,114,115].

Samples DO-18 and 28 provide a further blueschist-facies metabasalt lens in the same large mélange block north of Dobšiná (Figure 3 and Figure 4). These have medium SiO2, CaO, and K2O content compared to the former group with the highest TiO2, the lowest MgO and increased Na2O. They also have abundant HFSEs (Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta), Eu, Sm, Nd, with εNd240 = 4.89 in the DO-18 sample. This second group exhibits alkaline nature with high Nb/Y ratios (~1.0–1.2) and low Zr/TiO2 (~0.01) (Figure 10 [107]). These metabasalts are also characterized by very high 2.96–3.00 wt. % TiO2 content, 147–164 Ti/V ratios and high 209–218 ppm Zr. Other incompatible element contents and ratios include Co (13.7–21.9 ppm), Nb/Yb (11.9–13.47), Ta/Yb (0.76–0.78), and Th/Yb (0.79–0.81). These are comparable to typical intra-plate alkaline basalts, such as ocean island basalts (OIB). The discrimination diagrams in Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14 [108,109,110,111] highlight that these rocks plot in the fields for alkaline oceanic within-plate basalts (WPB) and in oceanic subduction-unrelated settings, and they display significant LREE enrichment over HREE (Figure 15; cf. Figure S3 with rock/primitive mantle normalization). This is exemplified in their 5.4–6.2 (La/Yb)N ratios and the overall REE enrichment ranges from ~20 to ~120 Yb times the chondrite abundance and from ~6 to ~40 La times the primitive mantle abundance [112].

There are metabasalt to metadolerite interlayered cherty schists to radiolarites in a mélange block south of Dobšiná, and this is in tectonic contact with Jurassic flysch sediments (Figure 3). These metabasalts preserve the magmatic ophitic texture with pseudomorphs after Cpx, Amp, and lath-shape Pl, the latter minerals partly to totally replaced by newly-formed Act, Ep, and Ab from the MP greenschist facies metamorphic overprinting (Figure 5f,g, Figure 9c,d).

Characteristic is the highest CaO, MgO, and Fe2O3T content, the lowest SiO2 and alkalis (particularly K2O) and average TiO2 compared to the alkaline and calc-alkaline basalts. While they are enriched in V and Sr, they are quite decreased in LILE and HFSEs. This group is represented by a sample DO-K1 which has low Nb/Y ratio of 0.14. They also have characteristically higher εNd240 = 7.6, as in the DO-K4 basalt. The relatively high 0.07 Zr/TiO2 was most likely increased by the Zrn xenocrysts in this sample (Figure 10 [107]), and it has very low 0.15 wt. % TiO2 content and relatively low 110 ppm Zr and 31.7 ppm Y. Finally, the Ti/V ratio of 5 identifies the sample as boninite. However, due to the exceptionally low TiO2 content. The discrimination diagrams in Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14 [108,109,110,111] highlight that this rock plots in the fields for basalts generated at mid-ocean ridge settings with a composition close to typical N-MORB. Figure 15 [116] shows that the sample’s chondrite-normalized REE pattern is rather flat, and this is consistent with N-MORB compositions [113] because it exhibits LREE depletion (La/Yb)N = 0.74) and overall HREE enrichment 21 times the chondrite abundance and of 7 times primitive mantle abundance.

Here, sample MR-1 is interesting because it highlights that only a Brdárka ophiolitic fragment south of Dobšiná and below the Radzim Hill Silicic Nappe outlier (Figure 2) is a true N-MORB-type blueschist (εNd240 = 7.93, Table 1 and Table 2). This sample has very low 0.07 Nb/Y and 0.01 Zr/TiO2 ratios (Figure 10 [117]) which indicate its clear sub-alkaline nature. It has moderate 1.71 wt. % TiO2 content and relatively low 110 ppm Zr and 29.2 ppm Y. In addition, the 58 Ti/V ratio and Nb(Ta)/Yb and Th/Yb values establish that this sample plots in the field for basalts generated at mid-ocean ridge settings (Figure 14 [111]) or along the MORB–OIB array towards relatively depleted compositions (Figure 12 [109]). In addition, Figure 15 shows that the chondrite-normalized REE pattern is very flat, and the (La/Yb)N = 0.9 value is comparable to those with typical N-MORB composition. It has overall HREE enrichment 20 times chondrite abundance and of seven times primitive mantle abundance (Figure 15; cf. Figure S3). This basaltic rock plots in the typical N-MORB fields or in the boundary between N-MORB and tholeiitic volcanic arc basalts (Figure 11 [108], Figure 13 and Figure 14 [110,111]).

4.3.2. Jaklovce-Veľký Folkmár Area Metabasalts

Metabasalts and metadolerites in cherty schists and metaradiolarites still preserve magmatic ophitic and often amygdaloidal textures composed of Cpx and lath-shape Pl, with rare Cr-Spl (Figure 16a,b). They bear the signatures of metamorphic overprinting in networks of veins and veinlets infilled by newly-formed Chl, Ep, Cal, Ab, Act, less Win or Rbk, ±Qz (Figure 16c,d, Figures S1 and S2; Table S1). Meanwhile, the metamorphic process in more rigid radiolarites preferably ran in veins and veinlets infilled by the mentioned metamorphic minerals (Figure 16e,f). Rare pelagic carbonates are overgrown by Act-Chl-Ep aggregates (Figure 16g) and the micro-nodules in cherty clayey-carbonatic shales were replaced by metamorphic Amp, Cal, and Ep (Figure 16h). The published estimates established MP greenschist facies metamorphic P–T conditions [70,71,72] (Figure S1a).

Table 1 lists the major elements and this shows that most of the Jaklovce metabasites have basic composition, with SiO2 contents ranging from 39.63% (1 sample), but mostly from 43.37% to 49.82%. These rocks have clear sub-alkaline nature with very low 0.07 to 0.11 Nb/Y ratios. With the exception of JAK-18 and JAK-22’s 2.67–2.95 wt. % TiO2, their 1.52–1.97 wt. % TiO2, 0.15–0.31 wt. % P2O5, 87–172 ppm Zr, 31–54 ppm Y and 45-56 Ti/V ratios are very similar to those of modern MORBs [117]. The Nb(Ta)/Yb and Th/Yb values plot along the MORB-OIB array and cluster towards relatively depleted compositions (Figure 12 [109]). These rocks exhibit variable LREE depletion compared to the LREE normalized values of Šugov Valley, Hačava, and some Dobšiná samples (Figure 15; cf. Figure S3). This is evident in their 0.69–1.06 (La/Sm)N and 0.79–1.24 (La/Yb)N ratios which support their N-MORB affinity, and they also have overall HREE enrichment 19–33 times chondrite abundance and of 6–11 times primitive mantle abundance. The referenced discrimination diagrams (Figure 11 [108], Figure 14 [111]) depict that these basaltic rocks plot in typical N-MORB fields.

Figure 10 highlights that all studied metabasalt to dolerite samples (Figure 10 [107]) are N-MORBs according to chondrite normalized REE patterns ([116]; Figure 15) and other immobile trace elements in Table 1 (Figure 11 [108]) are typical of oceanic crust and particularly back-arc or marginal oceanic basins (Figure 13 [110]). The whole-rock Nd isotopic data (Table 2) of massive to amygdal basalts and dolerites (εNd240 = 7.26 and 7.89, JAK-1 and 2 samples, respectively) are consistent with their chondrite-normalized REE patterns (Figure 15; cf. Figure S3), thus indicating a depleted upper mantle source.

The Veľký Folkmár block of Meliaticum is a continuation of the Jaklovce mélange block towards the SE (Figure 2). The Veľký Folkmár (VFK-1, εNd240 = 8.23, Table 1 and Table 2) ophiolitic block shows the MP greenschist facies overprinting (Act, Phg, Ep, Ab) of metabasalts (Figure 6, Figure 16b). This event may have caused a slight enrichment of the sample VFK-1 in LREE (Figure 15) and an eccentric position in the N-MORB fields in discrimination diagrams (Figure 11, Figure 12a, Figure 13, Figure 14). The Veľký Folkmár sample has slightly higher, but still low Nb/Y = 0.14 and very low Zr/TiO2 = 0.01 ratios (Figure 10 [107]), thus displaying its clear sub-alkaline nature. It is characterized by moderate TiO2 = 1.97 wt. %, and similarly low Zr = 119 ppm and Y = 27.2 ppm contents. The Ti/V = 63 together with the Nb(Ta)/Yb and Th/Yb values plot the VFK-1 sample in the field for basalts generated at mid-ocean ridge settings [113] or along the MORB–OIB array towards depleted compositions (Figure 12 [109]).

The chondrite-normalized REE pattern is very flat, and the (La/Yb)N = 1.1 value is comparable to those with typical N-MORB composition (Figure 15; cf. Figure S3) The overall LREE enrichment is of 21 times the chondrite abundance and of 7 times primitive mantle abundance. In the discrimination diagrams (Figure 11 [108], Figure 14 [111]), this basaltic rock plot in the boundary between N-MORB and tholeiitic volcanic arc basalts.

4.3.3. Other Meliatic Metabasalts (Meliata, Čoltovo, Bretka, Hačava, Šugov Valley)

Some basalt-bearing blocks in the Jurassic sedimentary matrix of mélange blocks have well preserved magmatic textures. These textures of anchi-metamorphosed Pl-rich basalts are partly preserved in the Meliata (MEL-15) and Čoltovo (COL-1, εNd240 = 2.21, Table 1 and Table 2) localities and comprise acicular Ab-Pl aggregates with calcified Cpx phenocrysts. A metabasalt fragment at the Meliata village in sample MEL-15 is present as a very rare olistolith in the Jurassic sediments [4,64].

The Meliata and Čoltovo basaltic samples are generally geochemically similar, while Bretka appears some differences. All of them have slightly higher, but still low Nb/Y (0.14–0.18) and very low Zr/TiO2 (0.01) ratios (Figure 10 [107]), thus displaying their clear sub-alkaline nature. They are characterized by low to moderate TiO2 content (0.79–1.62 wt. %), and similarly low Zr (40–113 ppm) and Y (13.2–26.4 ppm) contents. The Ti/V ratio ranges between 51–57, and together with the Nb(Ta)/Yb and Th/Yb values, these plot them in the field for basalts generated at mid-ocean ridge settings [113] or along the MORB–OIB array towards depleted compositions (Figure 12 [109]). The chondrite-normalized REE patterns have slightly increased LREE over MREE and HREE (Figure 15; cf. Figure S3), with (La/Sm)N = 1.2–1.8 and (La/Yb)N = 1.5–2.8, and the overall LREE enrichment ranges from 21 to 28 times the chondrite abundance and of 8–9 times primitive mantle abundance. In the discrimination diagrams (Figure 11 [108], Figure 14 [111]), these basaltic rocks plot in the boundary between N-MORB and tholeiitic volcanic arc basalts. In contrast, Figure 13 [110] discrimination diagram has back-arc or arc transitional setting only in the Čoltovo sample. The decreased εNdt (Table 2) may indicate relatively strong hydrothermal alteration in this rock or a heterogeneous mantle source.

The Bretka locality mélange comprises metabasalts in association with serpentinites. Part of metabasalt fragments has alternation in some places with dark carbonatic schists (s. BRT-5) and shows the greenschist facies (Chl, Act, Ab, Ep, Czo, Cal) metamorphic overprinting. Other metabasalt fragments are metamorphosed in amphibolite facies (Ed to Prg, Ep, Czo, Ab-Pl, Ttn) crosscut by veinlets composed of greenschist facies mineral assemblages (s. BRT-1, εNd240 = 6.08, BRT-2; Table 1, Table 2, Table S1; Figure S1).

Most of the HP metabasalt-bearing blocks, including those from Šugov Valley (s. SUG-10) and Hačava (s. HAC-1), the described Dobšiná block north of Dobšiná town (s. DO-16, 20, DOL-1 samples) and further localities (Jasov, Bôrka) are not ophiolitic (Table 1 and Table 2). They contain Gln, Phg, Jd/Ab, Ep ± Grt, ± Tlc assemblages typical of the Bôrka Nappe [29,30,118]). The Grt blueschists (Figure S4, Table S1) of the Šugov Valley (SUG-10, εNd240 = 1.46, Table 1 and Table 2) and Hačava (HAC-1) alternate with pale Middle to Upper Triassic marbles overlying the Permian volcano-sedimentary rocks. The investigated metabasalt samples from Šugov Valley (SUG-10) and Hačava (HAC-1) have low Nb/Y (0.18), low Zr/TiO2 (0.01) in Hačava and slightly increased Zr/TiO2 (0.02) ratios (Figure 10 [107]). This places them in a sub-alkaline basalt–basaltic andesite field. In addition, the Šugov sample has moderate TiO2 content (1.71 wt. %), while Hačava’s is high (2.92 wt. %), and both samples have high Zr (348–385 ppm) and Y (79–85 ppm) contents. The Nb(Ta)/Yb and Th/Yb values plot them on the boundary between basic–intermediate rocks generated in intra-plate volcanic zones and active continental margin settings [114] or between the MORB–OIB and the volcanic arc arrays with relatively enriched compositions. This may indicate magma–crust interaction (Figure 12 [109]). The chondrite-normalized REE patterns exhibit slightly decreasing contents from LREE to HREE (Figure 15; cf. Figure S3), with (La/Sm)N = 1.6 to 1.7 and (La/Yb)N = 2.6 to 2.96 displaying overall LREE enrichment 141–143 times that in chondrite and of 47–48 times primitive mantle abundance. These samples plot in the calc-alkaline volcanic arc/arc transitional field or within-plate tholeiites (Figure 11 [108], Figure 13 [110], Figure 14 [111]).

4.4. Zircon and Rutile Geochronology Data and Interpretation

4.4.1. Dobšiná Area Mélange Blocks

The early Middle Triassic zircon U–Pb SIMS Concordia age of 245.5 ± 3.3 Ma was determined from a calc-alkaline metabasalt (sample DOL-1, analogous with DO-16 and 20; Figure 17a–c, Table 3, Table S2) in contact with hosting Lower/Middle Triassic(?) carbonate-marly sediments of a Dobšiná mélange block (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5a, Figure 9a,b).

Approximately one third of the 47 separated maximum 100μm Zrn grains from the blueschist-facies metabasalt (Figure 17a) are well shaped, oscillatorily zoned, and often with much higher Th/U ratio from 0.4 to 0.7 compared to older Early Paleozoic or Neoproterozoic Zrn (Table 3). These older Zrn grains, which are rounded due to recycling or a longer distance transport, and moreover often containing inherited cores overgrown by newer Zrn zones are interpreted as the xenocryst Zrn in basalt.

Because of mixing the different Zrn generations and unclear age of hosting sediments, it is not clear whether the youngest identified Zrn population is really own magmatic Zrn of the basalt. We can not exclude the situation, when this Zrn was gained together with the other detrital Zrn populations from non-consolidated Early/Middle Triassic sediments during the basalt emplacement. Such a Zrn population could have been released from a magmatic source (calc-alkaline basalts?) during the advanced continental margin rifting and subsequently transported to the marginal Meliata Basin by turbidites. Triassic acidic rocks are unknown in the IWC. Zircon of this (Anisian) age appeared even as a prevailing detrital Zrn population in biostratigraphically determined Ladinian to Carnian oceanic cherts in the Jaklovce area (Figure 18).

4.4.2. Jaklovce Area Mélange Blocks

The detrital zircon U–Pb SIMS ages of 247 ± 4 Ma and 243 ± 4 Ma were determined from the cherty shales (Figure 18a–f, Table 3 and Table S2), and xenocryst Zrn age of 266 ± 3 Ma from an approximately 0.5 m thick basalt layer (Figure 19a–c, Table 3 and Table S2) in the cherty shales (Figure 6, Figure 7b, Figure 16f).

Detrital Zrn grains from the prevailing Triassic Zrn population of cherts have magmatic well-shaped forms and oscillatory zoning, and these indicate an unknown Early/Middle Triassic magmatic source. The older Zrn is Permian, Early Paleozoic, and Neo-Proterozoic, and most likely derived from the Gemeric-type basement complexes (cf. [48]) including Permian granites and volcanites [49]. These rocks may have also been the Zrn source for cherty shales and N-MORB extrusions of the peperitic horizons (Figure 7g). The Anisian detrital Zrn ages constrain the maximum Ladinian age of the cherty shales and the N-MORB layer, and it is consistent with the radiolarian stratigraphy of the Lower Beds of the oceanic Jaklovce Succession.

Moreover, the Zrn detritus from the inferred Gemeric type Early Paleozoic basement complexes provides characteristic Concordia ages of 342 ± 5, 359 ± 7, 488 ± 7, and 505 ± 13 Ma [72].

The U–Pb SIMS metamorphic Rt age from metabasalt sample JAK-1 of approximately 100 Ma (Figure 20a,b, Table 3) most likely indicates reburial/overheating of the Meliatic fragments within the IWC orogenic wedge in the late Early Cretaceous [8,119].

5. Discussion and Summary of Main Results

5.1. Mélange Sources as Indicators of the Meliatic Triassic–Jurassic Paleotectonic Zones

The geological, lithostratigraphical, geochemical, and bio-geochronological criteria used herein enabled determination of three principal Meliatic Superunit paleotectonic zones as the mélange sources:

(1) Continental margin crust; comprises (a) the Permian–Lower Triassic volcano-sedimentary cover rocks: Siliciclastic sediments associated with trachyrhyolites to trachyandesites, calc-alkaline rhyolites, dacites, and basalts overlying the Early Paleozoic basement rocks and (b) the Middle to Upper Triassic/Lower Jurassic (Gemeric) slope successions (cf. [2,77]).

(2) Oceanic margin crust; composed of the Middle (Ladinian) to Upper Triassic (Carnian–Norian and younger) pelagic cherty sediments, N-MORBs and rare alkaline OIBs associated with serpentinized and rodingitized, mostly harzburgitic, mantle fragments (cf. [2,4,7,8,77,90,91,92]).

(3) Transitional zone between the continental and oceanic crust; composed of trench-like upper Lower Jurassic (Toarcian) to lower Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) calciclastic and Middle to lower Upper Jurassic (Bathonian to Oxfordian) siliciclastic turbiditic flysch formations with olistoliths of Triassic carbonates, radiolarites, and rarely of basalts which may have been derived from both continental and oceanic margin zones (cf. [77,85]).

The first mélange source is the Bôrka Unit, derived from a distal part of the shelf to slope facial zones [2,3,4,77]. Their nappe outliers occur throughout the Gemeric and southern part of the Veporic superunits (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3, Figure 6). The siliciclastics, slope limestones with shallow-water limestone olistoliths and basalt lava interlayers are metamorphosed to phyllitic and glaucophane schists [29,74,75]. The representative localities are the Bôrka and Hačava village areas and the Šugov Valley (Figure 2).

The second mélange source is the Jaklovce Unit which is the most characteristic oceanic or ophiolitic sedimentary–magmatic succession of the Meliaticum. However, the oceanic Jaklovce Succession was more precisely defined using our new biostratigraphic data (Figure 8) which distinguished the Lower (Ladinian), Middle, and Upper (Carnian to Norian?) Beds. Therefore, we recommend use of the Jaklovce Unit for this unique oceanic, although incomplete ophiolitic paleotectonic Meliatic domain. The Middle to Late Triassic meta-ophiolitic fragments achieved a variable degree of metamorphic overprinting before they were tectonically juxtaposed with the Jurassic flysch sediments, the latter as the soft mélange matrix besides the serpentinitic (seafloor erosion?) sandstones. This unit typically occurs around the Jaklovce village, but also in a mélange block south of Dobšiná town (Figure 3 and Figure 6).

The third mélange source is the Meliata Unit, and this includes the Meliata Unit s.s. previously defined by [2,85]. The sole of the calciclastic and siliciclastic flysches might have been extensionally exhumed serpentinized subcrustal mantle separating the thinned distal continental margin and evolving oceanic margin (Figure 21). Thin, magnetite-rich layers in flysch may indicate a serpentinized mantle source. Two different Jurassic successions formed during the contraction-subduction period of the Meliata Basin in the late Early to early Late Jurassic.

An older part of the trench-like Jurassic flysch succession is characterized by calcareous shales (marlstones) interbedded by carbonatic sandstones rich in detrital Ms, Cal, Dol, Pl/Ab, less Tur, and Qz likely of turbiditic origin. This occurs near both Dobšiná town and Jaklovce village (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). The inferred maximum late Early Jurassic age was determined after Posidonia-type bivalves located in the Dobšiná quarry calcareous shales. The metamorphic overprinting of these shales is indistinct despite stronger deformation by intra-folial folding and the secondary cleavage formation, boudination of competent sandy layers, Cal mobilization veins or veinlets and formation of the authigenic Ab, Qz, and Chl. There are clear differences in the metamorphic overprinting grade between the MP/LT grade olistoliths or olistostromatic breccia materials and the Jurassic sediments in the mélange with indistinct or VLT metamorphic overprinting.

Relatively younger deep-water below the CCD level flysch succession has a dark-grey to black shaly argillaceous-cherty sediments interlayered with the Bathonian to early Oxfordian dark-gray, green and red radiolarites [2,4,77,85]. Thin siliciclastic sandstones rich in detrital Ms, Pl/Ab, less Tur, and Qz, without carbonatic input are most likely of turbiditic origin. This type of siliciclastic flysch formation occurs around the Meliata village type locality, and accompanying very low-grade metamorphic overprinting is hardly recognizable [40]. Olistoliths of the Triassic radiolarites at Meliata village have similar negligible metamorphic overprint and only chalcedonized radiolarians. In contrast, the pale Triassic marble olistoliths from the Meliata quarry have strong metamorphic-deformational overprinting ductile mylonitic structures. It is therefore generally accepted that the Meliata Unit s.s. was not a subducted part of the Meliaticum, but anchimetamorphosed in an accretionary wedge [8,40].

We suggest the use of the Meliata Unit term for this Jurassic deep-water pelagic trench-like succession with pre- and post-metamorphic olistoliths. Fragments derived from the inferred ophiolitic successions are very rare in the Meliata Unit cross-section [64,85] and only the Middle-Triassic radiolarites without pillow-basalts have been reported [1,2,3,4,77,85]. One fragment of an N-MORB (MEL-15 sample in Figure 15) was discovered S of the nearby Licince village during the field mapping [64].

The Middle to lower Upper Jurassic Bathonian–lower Oxfordian flysch succession is overlain by an upper Oxfordian coarsening upward sequence [85]. This most likely heralded the final closure of the Meliata Basin following subduction of thinned continental and oceanic margin fragments including the flysch inferred mantle-type substrate (Figure 21). While some authors report the Middle Jurassic succession as a trench flysch contemporaneous with subduction and accretionary wedge formation [4,76], the deposition of a part of the succession preceded the late Middle to Late Jurassic subduction period and this is consistent with the younger 40Ar–39Ar ages [80,81,82] of the blueschist HP peak phengite (160–150 Ma). The flysch formation started during a contraction period and this calciclastic flysch age was determined to Toarcian–Bajocian (~180–168 Ma) according to Posidonia-type bivalves from Dobšiná. The deeper-water siliciclastic Bathonian–lower Oxfordian (~167–160 Ma) radiolarians-bearing flysch succession [85] may reflect the flysch basin deepening during the main Middle to early Late Jurassic subduction period.

This trench-like flysch intra-oceanic sedimentary facies may be related to the Neotethyan compression phase recognized throughout the Neotethyan domains of the Southern Alps, Dinarides, and Pelso areas [10]. This phase is a Middle Jurassic intra-oceanic subduction event and north-west obduction of the Triassic ophiolitic sheets [10]. The Meliata Unit flysch basin has a fore-arc/foreland basin position in the relationship to NW-ward ophiolitic Jaklovce Unit nappe transport or a trench-like (supra-subduction) position in relationship to the Middle to Late Jurassic subduction of the Bôrka Unit (Figure 21).

5.2. Geochemical Constraints on the Meliatic Basalts Paleotectonic Setting

Geochemical data from the Meliatic basaltic rocks show at least three principal protoliths from three different paleo-tectonic settings (Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15).

(1) The calc-alkaline basalts have enriched LREE content and depleted HREE content with pronounced Eu anomaly (Figure 15) and this reveals genesis bound to fractional crystallization. The basalts also have Ta, Nb, and Ti depletion, thus suggesting that their mantle source was already depleted in these elements from previous or contemporaneous melt extraction events ([120] and Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14). These basalts’ interaction with crustal sources is compatible with their negative to lower positive εNdt values (DO-16, SUG-10, Table 2), and most are incorporated in the Bôrka Nappe derived from the Bôrka Unit with predominant blueschist facies metamorphics [29,78,79].

(2) The alkaline basalts have slight LREE enrichment, slight HREE depletion and they lack Eu anomaly. This emphasizes their primitive source (lherzolite origin?) and the absence of plagioclase in the early crystallization process. This is consistent with their distinctly positive εNdt values (DO-18, Table 2). The REE and many incompatible element ratios, including those for Th/Yb, Nb/Yb, Ta/Yb in Table 1, are quite similar to those observed in typical ocean island basalts [121,122]. This suggests that these rocks’ magmas in the Dobšiná mélange block may have originated from a partly melted plume-type source and are an early stage of the oceanic rifting and ridge-spreading inferred from the Jaklovce Unit (Figure 12b).

(3) The N-MOR basalts are bound only to the Jaklovce Unit, as revealed by the geochemical study (Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14, Table 1). This unit has ophiolitic blocks in the mélange in areas south of Dobšiná (DO-K), below the Malý Radzim Hill (MR) west of Brdárka and near Jaklovce (JAK), Veľký Folkmár (VFK), Meliata (MEL), Čoltovo (COL), and Bretka (BRT). Table 2 highlights that they have typically higher positive εNdt values. However, the COL-1 sample is rich in Pl and this may indicate a heterogeneous mantle source. Their metamorphic overprinting varies from very low-grade greenschist facies to greenschist, and the discovery of only MR-1 sample indicates that they rarely vary to blueschist facies. These blocks are usually associated with cherty shales and radiolarites and they finally occur in indistinctly metamorphosed Jurassic sediments (Figure 21).

Figure 15 and Figure S3 highlight that the trace element concentrations and LREE/HFSE and LILE/HFSE signatures suggest that most of these N-MORBs originated in a mid-ocean ridge setting without the influence of enriched OIB-type- or subduction-related components. Additional features supporting this suggestion are that the Th versus Nb values have no Nb enrichment compared to Yb [109] and other incompatible elements [122,123,124,125,126,127,128]. Similar metabasalts with N-MORB composition and only slight (Ce/Yb)N = 0.9–1.7 and (La/Sm)N = 0.6–0.9 fractionation were documented from the Folkmár Zone [5]. Almost complete lack of a sheeted-dyke and gabbroic layers infers a marginal oceanic basin with incomplete ophiolites.

The abyssal type harzburgites in the Jaklovce Unit ophiolite complex, having a character of weakly depleted harzburgites are consistent with the marginal basin with the subduction-unrelated mantle rocks [7,90,91,92,93,94]. They are also typical of the mantle portion of the ophiolitic complexes [93,94] from the passive margins reported by [129], and which evolved during rift-drift and seafloor spreading [130]. Moreover, the rodingite dykes cross-cutting serpentinized harzburgites may already have formed on the ocean floor [92]. While the relict homogeneous massive rodingite εNd240 = 5.38; sample DO-113 in Table 1 and Table 2 is predominantly composed of H-Grs, H-Adr, and Chl, the Prv dating from a reaction zone of serpentinite and a massive inferred original rodingite dyke is Early Cretaceous at approximately 135 Ma and therefore constrains the exhumation of these metarodingites from the Meliatic accretionary wedge [8,73,92]. Extensionally exhumed sub-crustal mantle rocks might have formed a sole of the Middle Jurassic trench-like flysch basin (Figure 21).

5.3. Evolutionary Model of Meliaticum from Lithology, Geochemistry and Bio-Geochronological Data

Integrated bio and geochronology investigation brought new results which could be applied for a tentative Meliaticum evolutionary model (Figure 21). The Neotethyan back-arc basin model, proposed for the Meliaticum by authors [8,12,15,16,17] and many others, is doubtful because the Meliaticum was most likely paleogeographically far W of the inferred Paleotethyan active margin in Permian–Triassic, and separated from the southern margin by a large Neotethyan ocean [10].

5.3.1. Middle Triassic to Early Jurassic Extension Basin Period (~240–180 Ma)

The Permian calc-alkaline volcanism identified in the IWC continental crust units [47,49,53,57,58,59,60] may have geodynamically preceded the formation of subsequent early Middle Triassic magmatics, the Zrn of which we established from deep-water sediments of the Meliata Basin continental and oceanic margin successions. The youngest Zrn population found in basalt sample DOL-1 from the Dobšiná quarry (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5a,b, Figure 9a,b) was dated to 245.5 ± 3.3 Ma by U–Pb SIMS (Figure 17a–c), and this is interpreted as the magmatic crystallization age of these basalts. Anyway, it constrains the maximum age of hosting sediments to the late Anisian. Alternatively, the calc-alkaline character of basalt samples DO-16, 20 and DOL-1 (Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15) may suggest a (re)melted Early Paleozoic active continental margin crust during the early Middle Triassic extension and then the discussed Zrn is inherited from a protolith. There is also clear host sediment input of external older Zrn populations to the unconsolidated basaltic melt.

The sedimentation of early Middle Triassic cherty carbonates and shales on a subsiding thinned (Gemeric-type) continental margin is interpreted as an advanced continental margin rifting stage and the formation of the marginal Meliata Basin of a large Neotethys Ocean. This event clearly exceeds the inferred Permian active continental margin of a Paleotethyan ocean [12,15,16,17], and therefore the Permian–Triassic super-plum area generation could be imposed from such an intensive whole-Permian magmatic activity in the IWC Variscan basement complexes. The plum generation could be related to the subducted Devonian to Carboniferous Paleotethyan oceanic and continental margin crust, and the existence of “hot lines” is inferred by some authors [46,49]. Continual overheating from the Late Permian to Triassic is also indicated by the EPMA determined newly-formed Mnz ages of 250–225 Ma in the Gemeric basement Permian granites, or in the outer zones of magmatic Mnz in these granites from the inferred Meliatic northern continental margin [49].

The onset of the oceanic rifting stage of the Meliata Basin initiated the formation of greenish and reddish pelagic cherty shales (s. JAK 1/3; Figure 6, Figure 7a, Figure 16e). These had rare thin cherty carbonate and basaltic tuff layers, and herein we document Ladinian radiolarians in the Lower Beds of the oceanic Jaklovce Succession for the first time (Figure 8, images 1–9). Although, this age was inferred from lithological similarities with other Meliatic occurrences [4,68,69]. The basalt samples DO-18 and DO-28 have alkaline character and may come from a paleo-rift from an early stage of the oceanic crust formation of this marginal oceanic basin (Figure 21). This alkaline basalt type geochemistry shown in Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15 could be related to a mantle plum upwelling indicated in Figure 12b.

The evolving oceanic rifting stage is recorded by N-MOR-type basalt layers in the Ladinian to Carnian cherts, or by the cherty interlayers enclosed in the basalts often forming peperitic breccias (Figure 6, Figure 7g). Herein, we also document Ladinian to Carnian radiolarians from the Middle (s. JAK-1/2) and Upper (s. JAK-2/1) Beds of the oceanic Jaklovce Succession of the Jaklovce Unit for the first time (Figure 6, Figure 7b,d, Figure 8—images 10–23, Figure 16f–h).

Figure 18a–f shows the detrital Zrn U–Pb SIMS Concordia ages of 247 ± 4 Ma and 243 ± 4 Ma from the cherty shales (s. JAK-5A~JAK-1/2), and Figure 19a–c records the Zrn xenocryst population Concordia age of 266 ± 3 Ma from a 0.5 m thick N-MOR basalt layer (s. JAK-1) in the cherty shales. These reveal continuing connection of the evolving oceanic basin with an adjacent rifted continental margin Permian to early Middle Triassic Zrn magmatic sources. Rhyolitic and “keratophyric” (trachydacites to trachyandesites in the TAS diagram [131]) clastogeneous to blocky materials of unknown age (Permian to Middle Triassic) were reported from the Jurassic olistostromatic conglomerates and sandstones at the Meliata [4] and Jaklovce [132] villages and also from the Držkovce (DRŽ-1, [133]) and Brusník (BRU-1, [63]) boreholes which could also be their source. Similar and younger ages of the Ladinian to Carnian magmatic activity of 242–227 Ma were reported from the Southern Alps [134]) and also from the Transdanubian Range [35,135] areas from the inferred opposite side of the Neotethys Ocean.

5.3.2. Middle to Late Jurassic Subduction, Basin Closure and Accretionary Wedge Mélange Formation (~180–130 Ma)

Southward subduction began in the Middle Jurassic, and the buoyant Jurassic trench-like flysch sediments may have lost their denser sole “transitional” crust during subduction of the distal continental and marginal oceanic crust (Figure 21). Part of the ophiolitic fragments (MEL, COL samples) emplaced in the Jurassic sediments are most likely olistoliths scraped off the marginal oceanic crust during the initial contraction regime in the late Early Jurassic. This is an upper age limit of the trench-like flysch sediments according to Posidonia-type bivalves.

Fragments from the continental margin Bôrka Unit (DO-16, 20, DOL-1, SUG-10, HAC-1 samples) and the oceanic margin Jaklovce Unit (MR-1, DO-18, 28 samples) were subducted to a HP depth and these were tectonically juxtaposed with the Jurassic flysch sediments of the accretionary wedge after their exhumation from a subductional channel at approximately 150–130 Ma [8]. The subductional bending of the northern segment of the Meliatic oceanic crust below its southern segment in an inferred mechanically weakened paleo-rift zone may have then caused the intra-oceanic Middle to Late Jurassic volcanic arc (Szarvaskő?) formation which defines the expansion of the Neotethyan Vardar Ocean to the south (Figure 21).

Subductional burial of the ophiolitic Jaklovce Unit fragments with the JAK, DO-K, BRT, and VFK samples to MP depths is constrained by the MP/LT metamorphic assemblages composed of Chl, Act, Win, Rbk, Ttn, Ep, Cal, Qz, and Phg (Figure 9c,d, Figure 16a–h, Figures S1 and S2; Table S1).

Similarly, the Meliata Unit Jurassic flysch with the rare metabasalts (MEL-15 and COL-1 samples) have only a slight anchimetamorphic overprinting [4,40].

The investigated Jaklovce, Veľký Folkmár and the Dobšiná DO-K sample fragments have distinctly higher grade MP/LT metamorphic overprinting than the Jurassic flysch sediments. We consider that these are post-subduction olistoliths because they occur as metamorphosed fragments in maximally anchimetamorphosed flysch calcareous shales. Examples of this include the exhumed Bôrka Unit HP (DO-16, DO-20, DOL-1), the Jaklovce Unit HP (MR-1 and DO-18, 28), and other MP (DO-K, JAK, VFK) fragments which were finally tectonically juxtaposed with the Jurassic sedimentary succession of the Meliata Unit as the mélange matrix (Figure 21).

The metamorphic overprinting grade of the Meliatic subduction-related accretionary wedge is mostly in the MP greenschist- to HP blueschist facies (see also [8,29,70,71,72,73,74,75] and Figures S1, S2, S4; Table S1). The unsubducted to shallowly subducted parts have maximum anchimetamorphic overprinting [1,2,4,8,30,64,76,77], with the exception of some Bretka N-MORB fragments metamorphosed in the amphibolite facies (BRT-1, 2, 8 samples; Figures S1 and S2; Table S1). This may indicate the metamorphic sole position of this part of the Jaklovce Unit during the NW-ward thrusting of the ophiolite sheets over the Meliata Unit flysch and the exhumed Bôrka Unit fragments (Figure 21). The inferred tectonostratigraphy of an accretionary wedge may be partly preserved in a superposition of larger blocks in the Meliatic mélange, for example at Dobšiná or Jaklovce.

Formation of the Meliatic subduction-related accretionary wedge mélange followed the closure of the Meliata Basin in the Late Jurassic. This process lasted until the Early Cretaceous [8] and was accompanied by a strong tectonization of the rapidly exhuming and cooling wedge fragments. This featured the mylonitization and cataclasis shown in Figure 5c–e. The Zircon (U–Th)/He ages of these fragments from approximately 130 to 100 Ma [8] and the metamorphic rutile U–Pb SIMS age of ca. 100 Ma from the s. JAK-1 Jaklovce metabasalt (Figure 20, Table 3) limit the ages of the mélange formation. This latter age also indicates incorporation of the frontal Meliatic nappe outliers in the IWC orogenic wedge [8]. In addition, the Meliaticum was cross-cut by a system of transpressional faults [34,35] which were active from the Latest Jurassic to Early Cenozoic (Figure 21). This made reconstruction extremely difficult.

In conclusion, the outlined tentative Meliaticum evolutionary model in Figure 21 concurs with a paleogeographic model of a rifted large Neotethys Ocean NW passive continental margin [10]. The intra-oceanic southward subduction of the Meliata Unit ophiolite complex may have led to the formation of the BAB Jurassic Szarvaskö ophiolites [34,37] which were already part of the Jurassic–Cretaceous Neotethyan Vardar Ocean [10] (Figure 21). Finally, the Szarvaskő Unit was displaced by the Telekesoldal and Mónosbél nappes of north-east Hungary, thus suggesting their Dinaridic origin [34,37], and this is supported by similar displaced units including the Turnaicum and Silicicum which overlie the Meliaticum.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/9/11/652/s1. Figure S1: (a) Diagram of amphiboles composition in the glaucophane/riebeckite-tremolite/actinolite-tschermakite ternary system after [136] for Dobšiná and Jaklovce metabasalts. (b) Classification diagram of amphiboles after [137] from Bretka metabasalts. Analyses in Table S1. Figure S2: Classification diagram of white mica after [138] from Dobšiná, Jaklovce and Hačava metabasalts. Analyses in Table S1. Figure S3: REE element (a) and Multi-element (b) Primitive mantle normalized patterns of Meliatic metabasalts. Normalizing values are from [116]. Figure S4: Classification diagram of garnet (in association with Gln and Phg) with almandine+pyrope (Alm + Prp), grossular (Grs) and spessartine (Sps) endmembers showing garnet composition from Hačava metabasalts. Analyses in Table S1. Table S1: Representative analyses of amphibole, white mica and garnet from Jaklovce, Dobšíná and Hačava. Table S2: Additional set of zircon U-Pb isotopic data for age calculation diagrams.

Author Contributions

Field investigation, M.P., P.R. and Z.N.; methodology, J.S., Q.-L.L., X.-H.L., Z.H., software X.L., Z.H., O.N.; validation, M.O. and M.P.; formal analysis, O.N.; resources, P.R.; data curation, M.O., O.N.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. (J.S. and M.O.); writing—review and editing, Z.N.; supervision and funding, M.P., Q.-L.L., X.-H.L., Z.H.; project administration, M.P., X.L., Z.H.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFE0203000) and the Slovak Research and Development Agency (contracts APVV-15-0050, APVV-17-0017), and VEGA Agency (No. 2/0034/16, No. 1/0151/19).

Acknowledgments

Constructive reviews of three reviewers are greatly appreciated. We thank H.-J. Gawlick and A. Vozárová for fruitful discussions; R. Marshall for reviewing the English content, Dana Troppová is thanked for zircon and rutile separation and radiolarians extraction, and J. Li for zircon and rutile mounting for SIMS dating.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

Kozur, H.; Mock, R. Zum Alter und zur tektonischen Stellung der Meliata-Serie des Slowakischen Karstes. Geol. Zbor. Geol. Carpath. 1973, 24, 365–374. [Google Scholar]
Kozur, H.; Mock, R. Erster Nachweis von Jura in der Meliata-Einheit der südlichen Westkarpaten. Geol. Paläont. Mitt. Innsbruck 1985, 13, 223–238. [Google Scholar]
Kozur, H. The evolution of the Meliata–Hallstatt Ocean and its significance for the early evolution of the Eastern Alps and Western Carpathians. Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl. 1991, 87, 109–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mock, R.; Sýkora, M.; Aubrecht, R.; Ožvoldová, L.; Kronome, B.; Reichwalder, P.; Jablonský, J. Petrology and petrography of the Meliaticum near the Meliata and Jaklovce villages, Slovakia. Slovak Geol. Mag. 1998, 4, 223–260. [Google Scholar]
Faryad, S.W.; Spišiak, J.; Horváth, P.; Hovorka, D.; Dianiška, I.; Jósza, S. Petrological and geochemical features of the Meliata mafic rocks from the sutured Triassic oceanic basin, Western Carpathians. Ofioliti 2005, 30, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
Kovács, S.; Sudar, M.; Karamata, S.; Haas, J.; Peró, C.; Grădinaru, E.; Gawlick, H.-J.; Gaetani, M.; Mello, J.; Polák, M.; et al. Triassic environments in the Circum-Pannonian Region related to the initial Neotethyan rifting stage. In Variscan and Alpine Terranes of the Circum-Pannonian Region; Vozár, J., Ebner, F., Vozárová, A., Haas, J., Kovács, S., Sudar, M., Bielik, M., Péró, C., Eds.; Geological Institute SAS: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2010; pp. 87–156. [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M.; Koppa, M.; Snárska, B.; Koller, F.; Uher, P. The blueschist-associated perovskite–andradite-bearing serpentinized harzburgite from Dobšiná (the Meliata Unit), Slovakia. J. Geosci. 2012, 57, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Putiš, M.; Danišík, M.; Ružička, P.; Schmiedt, I. Constraining exhumation pathway in an accretionary wedge by (U-Th)/He thermochronology–Case study on Meliatic nappes in the Western Carpathians. J. Geodyn. 2014, 81, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gawlick, H.-J.; Missoni, S. Middle Triassic radiolarite pebbles in the Middle Jurassic Hallstatt Mélange of the Eastern Alps: implications for Triassic-Jurassic geodynamic and palaeogeographic reconstructions of the western Tethyan realm. Facies 2015, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gawlick, H.-J.; Missoni, S. Middle-Late Jurassic sedimentary mélange formation related to ophiolite obduction in the Alpine-Carpathian-Dinaridic Mountain Range. Gondwana Res. 2019, 74, 144–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Csontos, L.; Vörös, A. Mesozoic plate tectonic reconstruction of the Carpathian region. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2004, 210, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Golonka, J. Plate tectonic evolution of the southern margin of Eurasia in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Tectonophysics 2004, 381, 235–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Handy, M.R.; Schmid, S.M.; Bousquet, R.; Kissling, E.; Bernoulli, D. Reconciling plate-tectonic reconstructions of Alpine Tethys with the geological-geophysical record of spreading and subduction in the Alps. Earth Sci. Rev. 2010, 102, 121–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Handy, M.R.; Ustaszewski, K.; Kissling, E. Reconstructing the Alps-Carpathians-Dinarides as a key to understanding switches in subduction polarity, slab gaps and surface motion. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2015, 104, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Stampfli, G.M. The Intra-Alpine terrain: A Paleotethyan remnant in the Alpine Variscides. Eclogae Geol. Helv. 1996, 89, 13–42. [Google Scholar]
Stampfli, G.M.; Borel, G.D.; Marchant, R.; Mosar, J. Western Alps geological constraints on western Tethyan reconstructions. J. Virtual Explorer 2002, 8, 77–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Stampfli, G.M.; Kozur, H. Europe from the Variscan to the Alpine cycles. In European Lithosphere Dynamics; Gee, D.G., Stephenson, R., Eds.; Geological Society London Memoirs: London, UK, 2006; Volume 32, pp. 57–82. [Google Scholar]
Lexa, J.; Bezák, V.; Elečko, M.; Eliáš, M.; Konečný, V.; Less, G.; Mandl, G.W.; Mello, J.; Pálenský, P.; Pelikán, P.; et al. Geological Map of Western Carpathians and Adjacent Areas 1:500,000; Geological Survey of Slovak Republic: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M. Tectonic styles and Late Variscan-Alpine evolution of the Tatric-Veporic crystalline basement in the Western Carpathians. Zent. für Geologie und Paläontologie 1991, 1, 181–204. [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M. Geology and petrotectonics of some shear zones in the West Carpathian crystalline complexes. Miner. Slov. 1991, 3, 459–473. [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M.; Ivan, P.; Kohút, M.; Spišiak, J.; Siman, P.; Radvanec, M.; Uher, P.; Sergeev, S.; Larionov, A.; Méres, Š.; et al. Metaigneous rocks of the West-Carpathian basement, Slovakia: Indicators of Early Paleozoic extension and shortening events. B. Soc. Geol. Fr. 2009, 180, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Putiš, M.; Danišík, M.; Siman, P.; Nemec, O.; Tomek, Č; Ružička, P. Cretaceous and Eocene tectono-thermal events determined in the Inner Western Carpathians orogenic front Infratatricum. Geol. Q. 2019, 63, 248–274. [Google Scholar]
Plašienka, D.; Grecula, P.; Putiš, M.; Kováč, M.; Hovorka, D. Evolution and structure of the Western Carpathians: An overview. In Geological Evolution of the Western Carpathians; Grecula, P., Hovorka, D., Putiš, M., Eds.; Mineralia Slovaca: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1997; pp. 1–24i. [Google Scholar]
Haas, J.; Kovács, S.; Krystyn, L.; Lein, R. Significance of Late Permian-Triassic facies zones in terrane reconstructions in the Alpine-North Pannonian domain. Tectonophysics 1995, 242, 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Janik, T.; Grad, M.; Guterch, A.; Vozár, J.; Bielik, M.; Vozárová, A.; Hegedüs, E.; Kovács, C.A.; Kovács, I.; Keller, G.R. Crustal structure of the Western Carpathians and Pannonian Basin: Seismic models from CELEBRATION 2000 data and geological implications. J. Geodyn. 2011, 52, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hovorka, D.; Jaroš, J.; Kratochvíl, M.; Mock, R. The Mesozoic ophiolites of the Western Carpathians. Krystalinikum 1984, 17, 143–157. [Google Scholar]
Ivan, P. Relics of the Meliata Ocean crust: Geodynamic implications of mineralogical, petrological and geochemical proxies. Geol. Carpath. 2002, 53, 245–256. [Google Scholar]
Reichwalder, P. Geologische Verhältnisse des jüngeren Paläozoikums im SÖ Teil des Zips-Gemerer Erzgebirges. Západné Karpaty 1973, 18, 99–139. [Google Scholar]
Faryad, S.W. Phase petrology and P-T conditions of mafic blueschists from the Meliata unit, Western Carpathians, Slovakia. J. Metamorph. Geol. 1995, 13, 701–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mello, J.; Reichwalder, P.; Vozárová, A. Bôrka Nappe: High-pressure relic from the subduction-accretion prism of the Meliata Ocean (Inner Western Carpathians, Slovakia). Slovak Geol. Mag. 1998, 4, 261–274. [Google Scholar]
Réti, Z. Triassic ophiolite fragments in an evaporitic mélange, Northern Hungary. Ofioliti 1985, 10, 411–422. [Google Scholar]
Kovács, S. Major events of the tectono-sedimentary evolution of the North Hungarian Paleo-Mesozoic: History of the Northwestern termination of the Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic Tethys. In Tectonic Evolution of the Tethyan Region; Sengör, A.M.C., Ed.; Kluwer Acad. Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989; pp. 93–103. [Google Scholar]
Horváth, P. Metamorphic evolution of gabbroic rocks of the Bódva Valley ophiolite complex, NE Hungary. Geol. Carpath. 2000, 51, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
Kövér, S.; Fodor, L.; Judik, K.; Németh, T.; Balogh, K.; Kovács, S. Deformation history and nappe stacking in Rudabánya Hills (Inner Western Carpathians) unravelled by structural geological, metamorphic petrological and geochronological studies of Jurassic sediments. Geodin. Acta 2009, 22, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kövér, S.; Fodor, L.; Kovács, Z.; Klötzli, U.; Haas, J.; Zajzon, N.; Szabó, C. Late Triassic acidic volcanic clasts in different Neotethyan sedimentary mélanges: Paleogeographic and geodynamic implications. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2018, 107, 2975–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zajzon, N.; Váczi, T.; Fehér, B.; Takács, Á.; Weiszburg, T.G. Pyrophanite pseudomorphs after perovskite in Perkupa serpentinites (Hungary): A microtextural study and geological implications. Physics Chem. Miner. 2013, 40, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kiss, G.B.; Oláh, E.; Zaccarini, F.; Szakáll, S. Neotethyan rifting-related ore occurrences: Study of an accretionary mélange complex (Darnó Unit, NE Hungary). Geol. Carpath. 2016, 67, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dosztály, L.; Józsa, S. Geochronological evaluation of Mesozoic formations of Darnó Hill at Recsk on the basis of radiolarias and K-Ar data. Acta Geol. Hungar. 1992, 35, 371–394. [Google Scholar]
Kiss, G.B.; Zagyva, T.; Pásztor, D.; Zaccarini, F. Submarine hydrothermal processes, mirroring the geotectonic evolution of the NE Hungarian Jurassic Szarvaskő Unit. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2018, 107, 2671–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Árkai, P.; Faryad, S.W.; Vidal, O.; Balogh, K. Very low-grade metamorphism of sedimentary rocks of the Meliata unit, Western Carpathians, Slovakia: Implications of phyllosilicate characteristics. Int. J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.) 2003, 92, 68–85. [Google Scholar]
Gawlick, H.-J. Triassische Tiefwasserfacieskomponenten (Kieselkalke, Radiolarite) in der jurassischen Strubberg-brekzie am Tennengebirgsnordrand (Nördliche Kalkalpen, Austria). Jb. Geol. B.-A. 1993, 136, 347–350. [Google Scholar]
Gawlick, H.-J.; Frisch, W. The Middle to late Jurassic carbonate clastic radiolaritic flysch sediments in the Northern Calcareous Alps: Sedimentology, basin evolution, and tectonics—An overview. Neu. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 2003, 230, 163–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bezák, V.; Broska, I.; Ivanička, J.; Reichwalder, P.; Vozár, J.; Polák, M.; Havrila, M.; Mello, J.; Biely, A.; Plašienka, D.; et al. Tectonic Map of Slovak Republic 1:500,000; Bezák, V., Ed.; Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic; State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2004.
Grecula, P.; Kobulský, J.; Gazdačko, Ľ.; Németh, Z.; Hraško, Ľ.; Novotný, L.; Maglay, J. Geological Map of the Spiš-Gemer Ore Mts. 1:50,000; Grecula, P., Ed.; Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic; State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2009.
Putiš, M. Variscan and Alpidic nappe structures of the Western Carpathian crystalline basement. Geol. Carpath. 1992, 43, 369–380. [Google Scholar]
Németh, Z.; Putiš, M.; Hraško, Ľ. The relation of metallogeny to geodynamic processes - the natural prerequisite for the origin of mineral deposits of public importance (MDoPI): The case study in the Western Carpathians, Slovakia. Miner. Slov. 2016, 48, 119–134. [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M.; Kotov, A.B.; Uher, P.; Salnikova, E.B.; Korikovsky, S.P. Triassic age of the Hrončok pre-orogenic A-type granite related to continental rifting: A new result of U-Pb isotope dating (Western Carpathians). Geol. Carpath. 2000, 51, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M.; Németh, Z.; Li, X.-H.; Yang, Y.-H.; Li, Q.-L.; Ling, X.; Nemec, O.; Ondrejka, M. Prototethys, Paleotethys and Neotethys remnants in the Western Carpathians constrained by SIMS and LA–ICP–MS U–Pb zircon ages. Geophysical Research Abstracts. In Proceedings of the EGU 2018, Vienna, Austria, 8–13 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
Radvanec, M.; Konečný, P.; Ondrejka, M.; Putiš, M.; Uher, P.; Németh, Z. The Gemeric granites as an indicator of the crustal extension above the Late-Variscan subduction zone and during the Early Alpine riftogenesis (Western Carpathians): An interpretation from the monazite and zircon ages dated by CHIME and SHRIMP methods. Miner. Slov. 2009, 41, 381–394, (In Slovak with English summary). [Google Scholar]
Radvanec, M.; Németh, Z.; Kráľ, J.; Pramuka, S. Variscan dismembered metaophiolite suite fragments of Paleo-Tethys in Gemeric unit, Western Carpathians. Miner. Slov. 2017, 49, 1–48. [Google Scholar]
Frisch, W.; Neubauer, F. Pre-Alpine terranes and tectonic zoning in the Eastern Alps. In Terranes in the Circum-Atlantic Paleozoic orogens; Dallmayer, R.D., Ed.; Geological Society of America: Boulder, CO, USA, 1989; pp. 91–100. [Google Scholar]
Neubauer, F.; von Raumer, F.J. The Alpine basement: Linkage between west-European Variscides and Alpine–Mediterranean Mountain Belt. In The Pre-Mesozoic Geology in the Alps; Von Raumer, F.J., Neubauer, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1993; pp. 640–663. [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M.; Ružička, P.; Ling, X.; Nemec, O. U/Pb SIMS zircon dating of a rhyolite intercalation in Permian siliciclastics as well as a rhyodacite dyke in micaschists (Infratatricum, W. Carpathians). Miner. Slov. 2016, 48, 135–144. [Google Scholar]
Spišiak, J.; Vetráková, L.; Chew, D.; Ferenc, Š.; Mikuš, T.; Šimonová, V.; Bačík, P. Petrology and dating of the Permian lamprophyres from the Malá Fatra Mts. (Western Carpathians, Slovakia). Geol. Carpath. 2018, 69, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kotov, A.B.; Miko, O.; Putiš, M.; Korikovsky, S.P.; Salnikova, E.B.; Kovach, V.P.; Yakovleva, S.Z.; Bereznaya, N.G.; Kráľ, J.; Krist, E. U/Pb dating of zircons of postorogenic acid metavolcanics and metasubvolcanics: A record of Permian-Triassic taphrogeny of the West-Carpathian basement. Geol. Carpath. 1996, 47, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
Vozárová, A.; Rodionov, N.; Vozár, J.; Lepekhina, E.; Šarinová, K. U–Pb zircon ages from Permian volcanic rocks and tonalite of the Northern Veporicum (Western Carpathians). J. Geosci. 2016, 61, 221–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vozárová, A.; Šmelko, M.; Paderin, I. Permian single crystal U-Pb zircon ages of the Rožňava Formation volcanites (Southern Gemeric Unit, Western Carpathians, Slovakia). Geol. Carpath. 2009, 60, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vozárová, A.; Šmelko, M.; Paderin, I.; Larionov, A. Permian volcanics in the Northern Gemericum and Bôrka Nappe system: U–Pb zircon dating and implication to geodynamic evolution (Western Carpathians, Slovakia). Geol. Carpath. 2012, 63, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vozárová, A.; Presnyakov, S.; Šarinová, K.; Šmelko, M. First evidence for Permian–Triassic boundary volcanism in the Northern Gemericum: Geochemistry and U–Pb zircon geochronology. Geol. Carpath. 2015, 66, 375–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ondrejka, M.; Li, X.-H.; Vojtko, R.; Putiš, M.; Uher, P.; Sobocký, T. Permian A-type rhyolites of the Muráň Nappe, Inner Western Carpathians, Slovakia: in-situ zircon U–Pb SIMS ages and tectonic setting. Geol. Carpath. 2018, 69, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vozárová, A.; Vozár, J. Late Paleozoic in West Carpathians; Bratislava, State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1988; pp. 1–314. [Google Scholar]
Mello, J.; Ivanička, J.; Grecula, P.; Janočko, J.; Jacko, S.; Elečko, M.; Pristaš, J.; Vass, D.; Polák, M.; Vozár, J.; et al. General Geological Map of the Slovak Republic, Map sheet: 37—Košice (scale 1:200,000); Mello, J., Ivanička, J., Eds.; Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic; State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2008.
Vozárová, A.; Vozár, J. Tornaicum and Meliaticum in bore-hole Brusník BRU-1, Southern Slovakia (Brusník Anticline, Rimava Depression). Acta Geol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 1992, 35, 97–116. [Google Scholar]
Mello, J.; Elečko, M.; Pristaš, J.; Reichwalder, P.; Snopko, L.; Vass, D.; Vozárová, A. Geological Map of the Slovenský Kras Mts., 1:50,000. Regional Geological Maps of Slovakia; Mello, J., Ed.; Ministry of Environment and State Geological Survey of Slovak Republic: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1996. [Google Scholar]
Lačný, A.; Plašienka, D.; Vojtko, R. Structural evolution of the Turňa Unit constrained by fold and cleavage analyses and its consequences for the regional tectonic models of the Western Carpathians. Geol. Carpath. 2016, 67, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biely, A.; Bezák, V.; Elečko, M.; Gross, P.; Kaličiak, M.; Konečný, V.; Lexa, J.; Mello, J.; Nemčok, A.; Potfaj, M.; et al. Explanation to Geological Map of Slovakia 1: 500,000; Biely, A., Ed.; GSSR: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1996; pp. 1–77. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
Gawlick, H.-J.; Havrila, M.; Krystyn, L.; Lein, R.; Mello, J. Conodont colour alteration indices (CAI) in the Central Western Carpathians and the Northern Calcareous Alps—A comparison. Geol. Carp. 2002, 53, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
Dumitrică, P.; Mello, J. On the Age of the Meliata Group and the Silica Nappe Radiolarites (localities Držkovce and Bohúňovo, Slovak Karst, ČSSR). Geol. Práce Spr. 1982, 77, 17–28. [Google Scholar]
Lačný, A.; Jósza, Š.; Ledvényová, L.; Ružička, P. Microfauna from the clasts of the carbonate-silicite breccias found near the Bohúňovo village (Slovak Karst, Western Carpathians). Miner. Slov. 2015, 47, 189–199. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
Ivan, P.; Méres, Š. Blueschist enclave in the Dobšiná serpentinite quarry: The evidence of the relation of the ultrabasic body to the Hačava Fm. of the Bôrka nappe (Meliatic Unit, Slovakia). Miner. Slov. 2009, 41, 407–418. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
Ivan, P.; Méres, Š.; Sýkora, M. Magnesioriebeckite in red cherts and basalts (Jaklovce Fm. of the Meliatic Unit, Western Carpathians): An indicator of initial stage of the high-pressure subduction metamorphism. Miner. Slov. 2009, 41, 419–432. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M.; Radvanec, M.; Sergeev, S.; Koller, F.; Michálek, M.; Snárska, B.; Koppa, M.; Šarinová, K.; Németh, Z. Metamorphosed succession of cherty shales with basalt and diastrophic breccia in olistolith of the Meliatic Jurassic accretion wedge near Jaklovce (Slovakia), dated on zircon (U–Pb SIMS SHRIMP). Miner. Slov. 2011, 43, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M.; Yang, Y.H.; Koppa, M.; Dyda, M.; Šmál, P. U/Pb LA–ICP–MS age of metamorphic-metasomatic perovskite from serpentinized harzburgite in the Meliata Unit at Dobšiná, Slovakia: Time constraint of fluid-rock interaction in an accretionary wedge. Acta Geol. Slov. 2015, 7, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
Leško, B.; Varga, I. Alpine elements in the West Carpathian structure and their significance. Miner. Slov. 1980, 12, 97–130. [Google Scholar]
Faryad, S.W. Lithology and metamorphism of the Meliata unit high-pressure rocks. In Geological Evolution of the Western Carpathians; Grecula, P., Hovorka, D., Putiš, M., Eds.; Mineralia Slovaca: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1997; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
Plašienka, D.; Méres, Š.; Ivan, P.; Sýkora, M.; Soták, J.; Lačný, A.; Aubrecht, R.; Bellová, S.; Potočný, T. Meliatic blueschists and their detritus in Cretaceous sediments: New data constraining tectonic evolution of the West Carpathians. Swiss J. Geosci. 2018, 112, 55–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kozur, H.; Mock, R. New paleogeographic and tectonic interpretations in the Slovakian Carpathians and their implications for correlations with the Eastern Alps and other parts of the Western Tethys. Part II: Inner Western Carpathians. Miner. Slov. 1997, 29, 164–209. [Google Scholar]
Mazzoli, C.; Sassi, R.; Vozárová, A. The Pressure Character of the Alpine Metamorphism in the Central and Inner Western Carpathians (Czecho-Slovakia); Vozár, J., Ed.; D. Štúr Inst. Geol.: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1992; Special volume IGCP; pp. 109–117. [Google Scholar]
Faryad, S.W.; Hoinkes, G. Two Contrasting Mineral Assemblages in the Meliata Blueschists, Western Carpathians, Slovakia. Miner. Mag. 1999, 63, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dallmeyer, R.D.; Neubauer, F.; Putiš, M. 40Ar/39Ar mineral age controls for the Pre-Alpine and Alpine tectonic evolution of nappe complexes in the Western Carpathians. In Pre-Alpine Events in the Western Carpathians´ Realm; Pitoňák, P., Spišiak, J., Eds.; Confer. excur. guide; Slovak Academy of Sciences: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1993; pp. 11–20. [Google Scholar]
Dallmeyer, R.D.; Neubauer, F.; Handler, R.; Fritz, H.; Müller, W.; Pana, D.; Putiš, M. Tectonothermal evolution of the internal Alps and Carpathians: Evidence from 40Ar/39Ar mineral and whole-rock data. Eclogae Geol. Helv. 1996, 89, 203–227. [Google Scholar]
Dallmeyer, R.D.; Németh, Z.; Putiš, M. Regional tectonothermal events in Gemericum and adjacent units (Western Carpathians, Slovakia): Contribution by the 40Ar/39Ar dating. Slovak Geol. Mag. 2005, 11, 155–163. [Google Scholar]
Maluski, H.; Rajlich, P.; Matte, P. 40Ar-39Ar dating of the Inner Carpathians Variscan basement and Alpine mylonitic overprinting. Tectonophysics 1993, 223, 313–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Faryad, S.W.; Henjes-Kunst, F. Petrological and K–Ar and 40Ar–39Ar age constraints for the tectonothermal evolution of the high-pressure Meliata unit, Western Carpathians (Slovakia). Tectonophysics 1997, 280, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kozur, H.; Mock, R.; Ožvoldová, L. New biostratigraphic results in the Meliaticum in its type area around Meliata village (Slovakia) and their tectonic and paleogeographic significance. Geol. Paläont. Mitt. Innsbruck 1996, 21, 89–121. [Google Scholar]
Németh, Z.; Radvanec, M.; Kobulský, J.; Gazdačko, Ľ.; Putiš, M.; Zákršmidová, B. Allochthonous position of the Meliaticum in the North-Gemeric zone (Inner Western Carpathians) as demonstrated by paleopiezometric data. Miner. Slov. 2012, 44, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
Árkai, P.; Kovács, S. Diagenesis and regional metamorphism of Aggtelek - Rudabánya Mountains (Northern Hungary). Acta Geol. Hungarica 1986, 29, 349–373. [Google Scholar]
Plašienka, D.; Broska, I.; Kissová, D.; Dunkl, I. Zircon fission-track dating of granites from the Vepor-Gemer Belt (Western Carpathians): Constraints for the Early Alpine exhumation history. J. Geosci. 2007, 52, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vojtko, R.; Králiková, S.; Jeřábek, P.; Schuster, R.; Danišík, M.; Fügenschuh, B.; Minár, J.; Madarás, J. Geochronological evidence for the Alpine tectono-thermal evolution of the Veporic Unit (Western Carpathians, Slovakia). Tectonophysics 2016, 666, 48–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Putiš, M.; Yang, Y.-H.; Vaculovič, T.; Koppa, M.; Li, X.-H.; Uher, P. Perovskite, reaction product of a harzburgite with Jurassic—Cretaceous accretionary wedge fluids (Western Carpathians, Slovakia): Evidence from the whole-rock and mineral trace element data. Geol. Carpath. 2016, 67, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Koppa, M.; Koller, F.; Putiš, M. Petrology and geochemistry of a peridotite body in CentralCarpathian Paleogene sediments (Sedlice, eastern Slovakia). Geol. Carpath. 2014, 65, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Li, X.-H.; Putiš, M.; Yang, Y.-H.; Koppa, M.; Dyda, M. Accretionary wedge harzburgite serpentinization and rodingitization constrained by perovskite U/Pb SIMS age, trace elements and Sm/Nd isotopes: Case study from the Western Carpathians, Slovakia. Lithos 2014, 205, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kamenetsky, V.; Crawford, A.J.; Meffre, S. Factors controlling chemistry of magmatic spinel: An empirical study of associated olivine, Cr-spinel and melt inclusions from primitive rocks. J. Petrol. 2001, 42, 655–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Choi, S.H.; Shervais, J.W.; Mukasa, S.B. Supra-subduction and abyssal mantle peridotites of the Coast Range ophiolite, California. Contrib. Miner. Petr. 2008, 156, 551–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Li, X.-H.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.-L.; Guo, C.H.; Chamberlain, K.R. Precise determination of Phanerozoic zircon Pb/Pb age by multi-collector SIMS without external standardization. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2009, 10, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
Li, Q.L.; Lin, W.; Su, W.; Li, X.H.; Shi, Y.H.; Liu, Y.; Tang, G.Q. SIMS U–Pb rutile age of low-temperature eclogites from Southwestern Chinese Tianshan, NW China. Lithos 2011, 122, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sláma, J.; Košler, J.; Condon, D.J.; Crowley, J.L.; Gerdes, A.; Hanchar, J.M.; Horstwood, M.S.A.; Morris, G.A.; Nasdala, L.; Norberg, N.; et al. Plešovice zircon—A new natural reference material for U–Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis. Chem. Geol. 2008, 249, 1–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wiedenbeck, M.; Alle, P.; Corfu, F.; Griffin, W.L.; Meier, M.; Oberli, F.; Vonquadt, A.; Roddick, J.C.; Speigel, W. Three natural zircon standards for U–Th–Pb, Lu–Hf, trace-element and REE analyses. Geostand. Newsl. 1995, 19, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Li, X.H.; Tang, G.Q.; Gong, B.; Yang, Y.H.; Hou, K.J.; Hu, Z.C.; Li, Q.L.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.X. Qinghu zircon: A working reference for microbeam analysis of U-Pb age and Hf and O isotopes. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 4647–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ludwig, K.R. User’s Manual for Isoplot/Ex rev. 2.49. A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel; Berkeley Geochronology Centre Special Publication: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2001; Volume 1, p. 56. [Google Scholar]
Li, C.F.; Li, X.-H.; Li, Q.-L.; Guo, J.H.; Yang, Y.-H. Rapid and precise determination of Sr and Nd isotopic ratios in geological samples from the same filament loading by thermal ionization mass spectrometry employing a single-step separation scheme. An. Chim. Acta 2012, 727, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kozur, H.; Mostler, H. Anisian to Middle Carnian radiolarian zonation and description of some stratigraphically important radiolarians. Geol. Paläont. Mitt. Innsbr. Sonderbd. 1994, 3, 39–255. [Google Scholar]
Halamić, J.; Goričan, Š. Triassic Radiolarites from Mts. Kalnik and Medvednica (Northwestern Croatia). Geol. Croat. 1995, 48, 129–146. [Google Scholar]
Gawlick, H.-J.; Frisch, W.; Hoxha, L.; Dumitrică, P.; Krystyn, L.; Lein, R.; Missoni, S.; Schlagintweit, F. Mirdita Zone ophiolites and associated sediments in Albania reveal Neotethys Ocean origin. Int J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.) 2008, 97, 865–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Oszvárt, P.; Kovács, S. Revised Middle and Late Triassic radiolarian ages for ophiolite mélanges: Implications for the geodynamic evolution of the northern part of the early Mesozoic Neotethyan subbasins. Bull. Soc. Géol. France 2012, 183, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
O’Dogherty, L.; Carter, E.S.; Goričan, Š.; Dumitrică, P. Triassic radiolarian biostratigraphy. In The Triassic Time Scale; Lucas, S.G., Ed.; The Geological Society of London: London, UK, 2010; Volume 334, pp. 163–200. [Google Scholar]
Pearce, J.A. A user’s guide to basalt discrimination diagrams. In Trace Element Geochemistry of Volcanic Rocks; Applications for Massive Sulphide Exploration; Short Course Notes; Wyman, D.A., Ed.; Geological Association of Canada: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 1996; Volume 12, pp. 79–113. [Google Scholar]
Wood, D.A. The application of a Th-Hf-Ta diagram to problems of tectonomagmatic classification and to establishing the nature of crustal contamination of basaltic lavas of the British Tertiary volcanic province. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1980, 50, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pearce, J.A. Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust. Lithos 2008, 100, 14–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cabanis, B.; Lecolle, M. Le diagramme La/l0-Y/15-Nb/8: Un outil pour la discrimination des séries volcaniques et la mise en évidence des processus de mélange et/ou de contamination crustale. Comptes Rendus De L’academie Des Sci. Paris Ser. 2 1989, 313, 2023–2029. (In French) [Google Scholar]
Meschede, M. A method of discrimination between different types of mid-ocean ridge basalts and continental tholeiites with the Nb–Zr–Y diagram. Chem. Geol. 1986, 56, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
McDonough, W.F.; Sun, S.-S.; Ringwood, A.E.; Jagoutz, E.; Hofmann, A.W. Potassium, Rubidium and Cesium in the Earth and Moon and the evolution of the mantle of the Earth. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1992, 56, 1001–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shervais, J.W. Ti-V plots and the petrogenesis of modern ophiolitic lavas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1982, 59, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pearce, J.A. Immobile Element Fingerprinting of Ophiolites. Elements 2014, 10, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pearce, J.A. Role of the sub-continental lithosphere in magma genesis at active continental margins. In Continental Basalts and Mantle Xenoliths; Hawkesworth, C.J., Norry, M.J., Eds.; Shiva Publications: Nantwich, UK, 1983; pp. 230–249. [Google Scholar]
McDonough, W.F.; Sun, S. The composition of the Earth. Chem. Geol. 1995, 120, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gale, A.; Dalton, C.A.; Langmuir, C.H.; Su, Y.; Schilling, J.-G. The mean composition of ocean ridge basalts. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2013, 14, 489–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Faryad, S.W. Glaucophanized amphibolites and gneisses near Rudník (Gemericum). Geol. Zbor. Geol. Carp. 1988, 39, 747–763. [Google Scholar]
Putiš, M.; Frank, W.; Plašienka, D.; Siman, P.; Sulák, M.; Biroň, A. Progradation of the Alpidic Central Western Carpathians orogenic wedge related to two subductions: Constrained by 40Ar/39Ar ages of white micas. Geodin. Acta 2009, 22, 31–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pearce, J.A. Trace element characteristics of lavas from destructive plate boundaries. In Andesites: Orogenic Andesites and Related Rocks; Thorpe, R.S., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1982; pp. 252–548. [Google Scholar]
Sun, S.-s.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 1989, 42, 313–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Saccani, E.; Dilek, Y.; Marroni, M.; Pandolfi, L. Continental margin ophiolites of Neotethys: Remnants of Ancient Ocean–Continent Transition Zone (OCTZ) lithosphere and their geochemistry, mantle sources and melt evolution patterns. Episodes J. Int. Geosci. 2015, 38, 230–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pearce, J.A.; Peate, D.W. Tectonic implications of the composition of volcanic arc magmas. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1995, 23, 251–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pe-Piper, G. The nature of Triassic extension-related magmatism in Greece: Evidence from Nd and Pb isotope geochemistry. Geol. Mag. 1998, 135, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Saccani, E.; Photiades, A. Petrogenesis and tectono-magmatic significance of volcanic and subvolcanic rocks in the Albanide-Hellenide ophiolitic mélanges. Island Arc 2005, 14, 494–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bortolotti, V.; Chiari, M.; Kodra, A.; Martucci, M.; Marroni, M.; Mustafa, F.; Prela, M.; Pandolfi, L.; Principi, G.; Saccani, E. Triassic MORB magmatism in the southern Mirdita zone (Albania). Ofioliti 2006, 31, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
Bortolotti, V.; Chiari, M.; Marcucci, M.; Photiades, A.; Principi, G.; Saccani, E. New geochemical and age data on the ophiolites from the Othrys area (Greece): Implication for the Triassic evolution of the Vardar ocean. Ofioliti 2008, 33, 135–151. [Google Scholar]
Bortolotti, V.; Chiari, M.; Marroni, M.; Pandolfi, L.; Principi, G.; Saccani, E. Geodynamic evolution of the ophiolites from Albania and Greece (Dinaric-Hellenic belt). One, two or more oceanic basins? Int J. Earth Sci. 2013, 102, 783–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Uysal, İ.; Ersoy, E.Y.; Karslı, O.; Dilek, Y.; Sadıklar, M.B.; Ottley, C.J.; Tiepolo, M.; Meisel, T. Coexistence of abyssal and ultra-depleted SSZ type mantle peridotites in a Neo-Tethyan Ophiolite in SW Turkey: Constraints from mineral composition, whole-rock geochemistry (major–trace–REE–PGE), and Re–Os isotope systematics. Lithos 2012, 132–133, 50–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Furnes, H.; Dilek, Y. Geochemical characterization and petrogenesis of intermediate to silicic rocks in ophiolites: A global synthesis. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2017, 166, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Le Bas, M.J.; Le Maitre, R.W.; Streckeisen, A.; Zanettin, B. A chemical classification of volcanic rocks based on the total alkali-silica diagram. J. Petrol. 1986, 27, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hovorka, D. Keratophyres in the Triassic near Jaklovce (Spišsko-gemerské rudohorie Mts—West Carpathians). Acta Geol. Et Geogr. Univ. Comen. Geol. 1977, 32, 57–79. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
Mello, J.; Vozárová, A.; Vozár, J.; Gargulák, M.; Hanzel, V.; Káčer, Š.; Karoli, S.; Molák, B.; Šucha, V.; Siráňová, V. Report on Structural Borehole Držkovce (DRŽ-1); Archive of D. Štúr Inst. Geol.: Bratislava, Slovikia, 1994. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
Mundil, R.; Brack, P.; Meier, M.; Rieber, H.; Oberli, F. High resolution U–Pb dating of Middle Triassic volcaniclastics: Time-scale calibration and verification of tuning parameters for carbonate sedimentation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1996, 141, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dunkl, I.; Farics, É.; Józsa, S.; Lukács, R.; Haas, J.; Budai, T. Traces of Carnian volcanic activity in the Transdanubian Range, Hungary. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2019, 108, 1451–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Everard, J.L. A blue amphibole occurrence from the Flowerdale River, northern Arthur Lineament. Miner. Resour. (Geol. Surv. Tasmania) 1999, 5, 117. [Google Scholar]
Hawthorne, F.C.; Oberti, R.; Harlow, G.E.; Maresch, W.V.; Martin, R.F.; Schumacher, J.C.; Welch, M.D. Nomenclature of the amphibole supergroup. Am. Miner. 2012, 97, 2031–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tischendorf, G.; Förster, H.-J.; Gottesmann, B.; Rieder, M. True and brittle micas: Composition and solid-solution series. Miner. Mag. 2007, 71, 285–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Schematic tectonic map of the Inner Western Carpathians (IWC, modified from [18]). 1—Quaternary and Cenozoic deposits undivided; Outer Western Carpathians Flysch Belt (OWC-FB); 1a—Paleogene deposits of the IWC; 2—Pieniny Klippen Belt (PKB); 3a—Upper Cretaceous to Eocene Gosau-type sediments; 3b—Upper Cretaceous Infratatric Succession; 4—Hronic nappes; 5—Fatric nappes; 6—Tatric cover; 7—North-Veporic cover; 8—South-Veporic cover; 9—Meliatic nappes; 10—Silicic nappes (including Turnaicum); 11—Gemeric Paleozoic basement (Variscan Lower Unit) and cover; 12—Variscan Upper Unit; and 13—Variscan Middle Unit. The square area is depicted in more detail in Figure 2.

Minerals 09 00652 g001

Figure 2. Tectonic map of the southeastern part of the IWC (modified from [43,44]). Red squares—investigated areas in greater detail at Dobšiná (DO), Jaklovce (JAK), and Veľký Folkmár (VFK). Additional samples are from Malý Radzim Hill near Brdárka (MR), Meliata (MEL), Bretka (BRT), Čoltovo (COL), Hačava (HAC), and Šugov Valley (SUG); and Jasov (JAS).

Minerals 09 00652 g002

Figure 3. Schematic geological map from Dobšiná area (modified from [44]) with sample location.

Minerals 09 00652 g003

Figure 4. The Dobšiná quarry serpentinitic mélange block with a 4 m long blueschist lens in contact with marble and Tlc-Chl-Phg-Cal schist fragments and Jurassic calciturbidite deposits.

Minerals 09 00652 g004

Figure 5. Rock fragments from serpentinitic mélange matrix in contact with marly shales N of Dobšiná (a)–(e): (a) Blueschist layer (dated sample DOL-1) in Tlc-Phg-Chl-Cal schist (lower right-hand corner). (b) Blueschist layer in marble. (c) Tectonized contact of a blueschist (top) and Tlc-Phg-Chl-Cal schist with pale calcite mobilizates. (d) Blueschist mylonite. (e) Serpentinized harzburgite mylonite. Metabasalt layers in metaradiolarites S of Dobšiná (f)–(g). (f) Metabasalt (sample DO-K12). (g) Metadolerite (sample DO-K13). (h) Jurassic calciturbidites (sample DO-F) composed of calcareous shales with millimetric to centimetric greenish clayey-marly and brownish carbonate-rich sandy layers (a quarry N of Dobšiná).

Minerals 09 00652 g005

Figure 6. Schematic geological map from Jaklovce area (modified from [44]) with sample location.

Minerals 09 00652 g006

Figure 7. Rock lithology from the oceanic Jaklovce Succession. (a) Reddish cherty schists from the Lower Beds with Ladinian radiolarians (s. JAK-1/3). (b) Alternation of reddish and greenish cherty schists (s. JAK-1/2~JAK-5, 5A) to metaradiolarites with a half-meter thick metabasalt layer (s. JAK-1, below dashed line) from the Middle Beds. (c) Detailed view on metabasalt s. JAK-1. (d) Reddish carbonate (bottom) passing upwards into the middle dark-red cherty clayey-carbonatic shale (s. JAK-2/1 with Middle to Upper Triassic radiolarians) and the top radiolarite with basaltic tuff layer. (e) Regular alternation of metabasalts (f) and metaradiolarite layers is often disturbed by (g) Peperitic breccias. (h) Brecciated margin of a lava flow with secondary Cal infilling cracks (s. JAK-5/19). (d)–(h) The Upper Beds. (i) Jurassic calciturbidites (calcareous flysch) with brownish carbonatic sandstone layers (s. JAK-202).

Minerals 09 00652 g007

Figure 8. Triassic radiolarian microfauna from the Jaklovce cross-section. Images 1–9 Ladinian radiolarians from cherty shales and radiolarites of the Lower Beds (s. JAK 1/3): 1, 2—Archaeocenosphaera sp.; 3, 4—Spumellaria gen. et sp. indet.; 5—Pseudostylosphaera nazarovi; 6—Pseudostylosphaera japonica; 7—Muelleritortis firma; 8—Muelleritortis cf. cochleata; and 9—Capnuchosphaera? triassica. Images 10–18 late Ladinian–early Carnian radiolarians from cherty shales of the Middle Beds (s. JAK 1/2): 10, 11—Corum kraineri; 12—Triassocampe scalaris; 13—Triassocampe cf scalaris; 14—Annulotriassocampe sp.; 15—Spongoxystris cf. slovenica; 16—Spongoxystris sp.; 17—Epningium cf. manfredi; and 18—Pseudostylosphaera cf. tenuis. Images 19–23 middle to late Carnian radiolarians from dark-red cherty clayey carbonatic shale of the Upper Beds (s. JAK 2/1): 19—Archaeocenosphaera sp.; 20—Pantanellium sp.; 21—Annulotriassocampe sp.; 22—Triassocampe sp.; and 23—Capnuchosphaera sp.

Minerals 09 00652 g008

Figure 9. Microstructures of Meliatic metabasalts. (a) Gln-Phg-rich blueschist (s. DOL-1) of calc-alkaline basalt protolith. (b) Contact of blueschist (s. DOL-1) with Tlc-Phg-Chl-Cal schist. (c) N-MOR metabasalt (s. DO-K1) with metamorphic Act (needles) to Mg-Rbk (bluish blasts), Chl, Ep and albitized Pl laths. (d) Metamorphic veinlets crosscutting radiolarians-bearing metachert (s. DO-K2, K3) with blue-green Amp-Cal-Chl-Ep aggregates. (e) N-MORB type blueschist (s. MR-1) from below the Malý Radzim Hill at Brdárka. The first and secondary metamorphic cleavage planes are defined by blue Gln. (f) Blueschist of N-MORB (s. MR-1) with layers rich in Ep, Ab, and Gln.

Minerals 09 00652 g009

Figure 10. Nb/Y–Zr/TiO2 discrimination diagram of [107] for the Meliatic metabasalts. Xenocryst Zrn most likely caused DO-K1 basalt shift to the rhyolite-dacite field.

Minerals 09 00652 g010

Figure 11. Zr/117–Th–Nb/16 discrimination diagram of [108] for the Meliatic metabasalts Three groups of basalts were distinguished: Calc-alkaline, alkaline, and N-MORB. Abbreviations; alkaline within-plate basalts (Alk WPB), enriched mid-ocean ridge basalts (E-MORB), normal mid-ocean ridge basalts (N-MORB), calc-alkaline volcanic arc basalts (VAB-C), tholeiitic volcanic arc basalts (VAB-T), and within plate tholeiites (WPT).

Minerals 09 00652 g011

Figure 12. Meliatic metabasalts in the Th/Yb versus Nb/Yb and TiO2/Yb versus Nb/Yb Proxy discrimination diagrams of [109]. (a) Most N-MORBs remain in the mantle array, thus suggesting subduction-unrelated upper mantle sources. The BRT, DO-K, and VFK N-MORBs may exhibit weak interaction with the crustal rocks from Jurassic subduction. Samples DO-18 and 28 are close to the OIB field. The DO-16, DO-20, SUG, and HAC calc-alkaline basalts may indicate deep-crustal recycling in a volcanic arc. (b) N-MORBs may suggest plume-ridge interaction in the initial stage of a marginal oceanic crust evolution (samples DO-18 and 28). Samples with decreased TiO2 are outside the OIB and MORB fields.

Minerals 09 00652 g012

Figure 13. Geotectonic origin of the Meliatic metabasalts in diagram of [110]. Three groups of basalts were distinguished: (1) calc-alkaline arc basalts (DO-16, 20), including transitional ones to arc tholeiites (SUG, HAC, COL), (2) alkaline (DO-18, 28), and (3) N-MORB, including N-MORB of BAB (a middle small triangle area).

Minerals 09 00652 g013

Figure 14. Geotectonic discrimination diagram Zr–Nb–Y [111] for the Meliatic metabasalts. The fields are: A1—within plate basalts, B—within plate alkali basalts and within plate tholeiites; C—E-type MORB; D—within plate tholeiites and volcanic arc basalts; and E—N-type MORB and volcanic arc basalts.

Minerals 09 00652 g014

Figure 15. (a) Multi-element diagram and (b) Chondrite-normalized REE element patterns of metabasalts from the Meliaticum. Normalizing values are from [116].

Minerals 09 00652 g015

Figure 16. Microstructures of rocks from the Jaklovce–Veľký Folkmár area. (a) (s. JAK-1) and (b) (s. VFK-1) examples of well preserved magmatic–ophitic to acicular structures of N-MORBs with Pl laths and tiny relics of Cpx crosscut by metamorphic veinlets. (c) Fragmented metabasalt by metamorphic veinlets. (d) Veinlet infill detail of s. JAK-1 with Cal, Act/Win/Rbk, Ep, Ab, and Chl. (e) Radiolarians-bearing metacherts with Phg-rich (original clayey) laminae (s. JAK-1/3). (f) Metamorphic veinlets crosscutting a metachert (s. JAK-1/2) composed of Amp (Act/Win/Rbk), Ep, Cal, ±Qz). (g) Granoblastic texture of a cherty carbonate enriched in metamorphic Amp aggregates. (h) Micro-nodules in cherty clayey-carbonatic shales (s. JAK-2/1) replaced by metamorphic Amp, Cal, and Ep.

Minerals 09 00652 g016

Figure 17. (a) Examples of zircon reflected light (RL) and SEM cathode-luminescent (SEM-CL) images from metabasalt s. DOL-1 in the Dobšiná quarry with dated spots. (b) Zircon U–Pb SIMS age diagram. (c) Relative probability and age histograms from s. DOL-1.

Minerals 09 00652 g017

Figure 18. (a) Morphology of dated zircon crystals in optical microscope from cherty schist sample JAK-5 (~JAK-1/2 sample layer) in Jaklovce cross-section (see Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 16). (b) Examples of zircon CL (SEM-CL) images with dated spots from s. JAK-5. (c) Zircon U–Pb SIMS age diagram from cherty schist s. JAK-5. (d) Zircon U–Pb SIMS age diagram from cherty schist s. JAK-5A (~JAK-1/2 s. layer) in Jaklovce cross-section; (a–c) from [72] for comparison with new dated s. JAK-5A. (e) Zircon relative probability and age histograms from cherty schist s. JAK-5. (f) Zircon relative probability and age histograms from cherty schist s. JAK-5A.

Minerals 09 00652 g018

Figure 19. (a) Examples of zircon CL (SEM-CL) images from metabasalt sample JAK-1 in Jaklovce cross-section (see Figure 6, Figure 7b,c, Figure 16a) with dated spots. (b) Zircon U–Pb SIMS age diagram from this sample. (c) Relative probability and age histograms from sample JAK-1.

Minerals 09 00652 g019

Figure 20. (a) Examples of rutile CL (SEM-CL) images from metabasalt s. JAK-1 in Jaklovce cross-section (Figure 6, Figure 7b,c, Figure 16a) with dated spots. (b) Rutile U–Pb SIMS age diagram from this sample.

Minerals 09 00652 g020

Figure 21. Paleotectonic zones and an outline of subduction–accretion structure of the Meliaticum (Meliata Superunit), not to scale. N–S distribution of the Triassic–Jurassic paleotectonic zones: GE—Gemericum (Gemeric Superunit—Early Paleozoic basement and Carboniferous–Lower Triassic cover), Bo—the Bôrka Unit continental margin fragments. Me—the Meliata Unit trench-like Jurassic sediments on inferred transitional mantle zone (tmz) separating the continental and oceanic margin crust, Ja—the Jaklovce Unit Middle to Late Triassic oceanic fragments. Br(Ja)—the Bretka ophiolite nappe sole of the Jaklovce Unit. TK—Tornakápolna Triassic ophiolite complex (NE Hungary), TU—Turnaicum, SI—Silicicum, TO—Telekesoldal and MB—Mónosbél nappes with the Szarvaskö type Jurassic ophiolites and flysch, B-TV—Bódva-Telekesvölgy T–J series. TR-DI-SA—the Transdanubian Range–Dinaridic–Southern Alps type basement, DF—Darnó Fault, MHF—Mid-Hungarian Fault, TS—the Tisia Microplate, ALCAPA—the Alps-Carpathian-Pannonia Microplate. Arcuate arrow—scraping-off zone and turbidite transport direction. Half-arrow—kinematics of the exhumation and thrusting in an accretionary wedge.

Minerals 09 00652 g021

Table 1. Major and trace elements from the whole-rock XRF and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) analyses. LOI = Loss on ignition.

Locality	Dobšiná	Radzim	Jaklovce	V.Folkmár	Bretka	Šugov	Meliata	Čoltovo	Hačava
Sample	DO-16	DO-20	DO-18	DO-28	DO-K1	MR-1	JAK-1	JAK-2	JAK-2A	JAK-3	JAK-4	JAK-6A	JAK-6B	JAK-18	JAK-22	VFK-1	BRT-1A	SUG-10	MEL-15	COL-1	HAC-1
wt. %
SiO2	59.54	59.96	51.39	53.03	49.47	47.21	39.63	46.90	47.80	49.82	48.55	48.05	48.63	43.37	47.63	46.47	49.51	54.63	43.79	45.78	49.55
TiO2	0.89	0.80	2.96	3.00	0.15	1.71	1.72	1.92	1.97	1.96	1.55	1.52	1.55	2.95	2.67	1.97	1.44	2.40	1.62	0.79	2.92
Al2O3	16.89	16.81	16.13	15.58	14.44	14.88	12.13	16.11	13.65	13.72	14.58	14.79	14.69	14.56	14.02	13.53	15.14	13.12	14.22	14.27	13.02
Fe2O3T	4.57	5.42	13.20	12.24	10.42	14.08	12.98	9.36	12.21	12.07	9.99	10.29	8.92	16.59	15.08	11.08	12.22	14.27	7.63	7.77	15.28
MgO	9.40	7.49	3.94	3.17	8.14	9.20	6.86	7.01	6.55	6.88	7.55	7.77	7.23	7.58	6.25	8.18	6.41	1.97	3.86	4.04	4.30
CaO	0.85	0.69	4.18	5.01	6.97	3.46	17.31	8.49	9.92	8.82	10.54	10.36	11.63	6.34	6.58	6.68	6.85	5.06	11.92	10.40	3.75
Na2O	6.63	7.72	6.14	6.55	4.33	3.89	1.64	4.53	3.90	3.87	3.61	3.42	3.60	3.62	3.69	4.05	4.80	4.53	4.82	5.63	3.45
K2O	2.18	1.08	0.52	0.57	1.66	1.40	0.06	0.13	0.23	0.39	0.19	0.16	0.06	0.11	0.05	1.71	0.18	1.40	0.03	0.11	4.09
P2O5	0.14	0.12	0.13	0.68	0.15	0.14		0.20	0.20	0.20	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.31	0.28		0.14	0.85	0.16	0.11	0.70
MnO						0.13	0.23	0.29	0.19	0.18	0.17	0.18	0.17	0.19	0.09			0.13	0.24	0.16	0.18
Cr2O3						0.03	0.36	0.05	0.02	0.02	0.04	0.04	0.04	0.01	0.01				0.03	0.05
LOI			1.60		4.10	3.60	7.00	4.70	3.20	1.80	2.90	3.00	3.10	4.10	3.30	6.10	3.10	1.40	11.50	10.70	2.40
Total	101.10	100.08	100.20	99.83	99.83	99.73	99.92	99.69	99.84	99.73	99.82	99.73	99.77	99.73	99.65	99.77	99.79	99.76	99.82	99.81	99.64
ppm
Sc	20.00	19.00	17.76	19.97	40.00	41.00	38.00	41.00	45.00	44.00	41.00	41.00	41.00	53.00	48.00	37.00	41.00	30.00	36.00	26.00	34.00
V	125	116	181	204	310	294	381	340	380	390	320	319	321	540	490	313	285	140.00	282	145	285
As	2.30	2.65	9.76	8.90	1.80	2.40	11.50	3.80	18.60	17.10	3.60	5.20	4.90	20.40	27.00	4.10	5.60	8.70	1.60		13.30
Rb	94	57.46	12.38	12.41	2.80	49.40	1.90	3.80	5.00	9.80	4.30	3.70	0.80	3.70	2.00	57.30	1.50	52.10	0.90	3.10	111
Sr	16.80	18.25	100	109	101	156	390	228	153	138	194	208	213	111	126	247	133	111	161	91	61.90
Y	22.88	23.21	37.21	34.72	31.70	29.20	41.90	34.80	38.50	38.30	30.50	31.00	31.00	53.80	51.90	27.20	24.80	84.90	26.40	13.20	79.20
Zr	151	139	209	218	108	115	105	123	113	140	88.10	93.30	86.90	172	165	119	84.70	385	113	39.90	348
Nb	16.65	16.27	35.84	42.56	4.30	2.00	2.90	3.40	3.40	3.40	2.10	2.30	2.20	5.60	5.60	3.70	4.50	14.90	4.10	1.90	14.40
Cs	12.30	14.55	0.47	0.45	0.10	1.60	0.30	0.30	0.60	1.90	0.40	0.50	1.30	3.20	2.80	1.80	0.10	3.40	0.40	0.30	4.70
Ba	210	154	88	105	11.00	117	9.00	19.00	18.00	29.00	23.00	27.00	33.00	17.00	13.00	129	23.00	178	13.00	15.00	591
Hf	4.14	3.88	5.22	5.88	3.20	3.00	2.80	3.20	3.20	3.80	2.60	2.70	2.70	4.60	4.40	3.33	2.40	10.10	3.00	1.20	8.70
Ta	1.15	1.35	2.29	2.46	0.90	0.10	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.50	0.40	0.20	0.30	1.30	0.20	0.09	1.00
Pb	1.70	0.80	2.10	1.85	1.20	3.10	2.80	1.70	6.20	1.30	0.60	1.50	3.80	1.30	1.30	1.10	1.60	1.50	0.70	0.70	2.30
Be	2.79	3.01	1.08	1.60	0.90	0.90	2.00	0.90	0.90	0.90	0.90	0.90	0.90	0.90	0.90	0.90	0.90	2.00	0.90	0.90	6.00
La	42.07	37.49	23.79	28.91	3.70	4.00	4.70	5.80	4.50	4.30	3.10	3.40	3.20	8.10	8.90	4.90	6.60	33.90	6.70	5.90	33.30
Ce	93.76	96.47	56.83	64.01	10.40	11.30	13.50	15.50	13.70	13.30	10.00	10.30	9.90	22.50	21.70	11.00	13.20	79.30	21.50	11.10	73.40
Pr	8.91	9.48	7.37	8.65	1.68	1.89	2.21	2.52	2.31	2.29	1.73	1.75	1.73	3.67	3.81	1.63	2.20	10.64	3.00	1.47	9.99
Nd	31.90	35.43	33.12	38.63	9.00	9.90	11.50	12.60	13.20	12.30	9.60	10.40	10.20	20.70	20.40	8.30	11.50	47.50	14.10	6.30	45.00
Sm	5.68	6.34	8.04	9.03	3.20	3.27	4.23	3.92	3.50	3.53	2.81	2.82	2.80	5.48	5.25	2.90	3.39	12.92	3.69	2.03	12.13
Eu	0.86	0.83	2.54	2.95	1.17	1.13	1.46	1.42	1.38	1.35	1.11	1.15	1.08	1.95	1.86	1.11	0.92	3.53	0.98	0.86	3.47
Gd	4.75	5.10	8.32	8.98	4.55	4.20	5.86	5.62	5.42	5.45	4.25	4.39	4.32	8.05	7.81	4.20	4.05	14.88	4.59	2.62	14.68
Tb	0.70	0.75	1.25	1.36	0.86	0.82	1.05	0.96	0.90	0.90	0.72	0.73	0.72	1.33	1.26	0.75	0.72	2.63	0.75	0.43	2.37
Dy	4.03	4.25	7.07	7.59	5.63	5.41	7.00	6.19	6.34	6.67	5.14	5.32	5.13	9.37	8.85	5.00	4.59	15.62	4.66	2.89	14.76
Ho	0.84	0.88	1.36	1.47	1.19	1.16	1.50	1.31	1.39	1.46	1.17	1.12	1.13	2.02	1.90	1.08	1.01	3.45	0.99	0.58	3.11
Er	2.48	2.54	3.53	3.77	3.76	3.39	4.45	3.73	4.12	4.07	3.32	3.30	3.37	5.73	5.44	3.34	2.93	9.96	3.06	1.70	9.05
Tm	0.39	0.39	0.49	0.51	0.52	0.52	0.64	0.54	0.53	0.54	0.41	0.43	0.43	0.75	0.68	0.50	0.44	1.41	0.44	0.23	1.29
Yb	2.63	2.60	3.01	3.16	3.38	3.14	4.06	3.47	3.78	3.95	3.08	3.05	3.08	5.34	4.89	3.15	2.82	8.88	3.01	1.43	7.65
Lu	0.40	0.39	0.43	0.45	0.49	0.51	0.64	0.53	0.58	0.60	0.47	0.46	0.47	0.81	0.72	0.49	0.45	1.36	0.45	0.22	1.16
Th	11.88	11.71	2.44	2.51	0.50	0.20	0.30	0.30	0.20	0.30	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.40	0.50	0.50	0.70	7.50	0.20	0.10	6.60
U	2.07	1.95	0.80	0.86	0.20	0.10	2.30	0.10	0.20	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.80	1.50	1.20	0.30	2.50	0.30	0.10	2.20
Co	25.90	24.60	21.90	13.70	33.30	23.10	35.90	30.70	43.90	39.40	35.80	35.50	29.30	44.90	58.40	5.70	45.30	18.30	9.20	18.70	21.90
Sm/Nd	0.18	0.18	0.24	0.23	0.36	0.33	0.37	0.31	0.27	0.29	0.29	0.27	0.27	0.26	0.26	0.35	0.29	0.27	0.26	0.32	0.27
Zr/Hf	36.51	35.68	40.07	37.12	34.28	38.20	37.50	38.41	35.31	36.87	33.88	34.56	32.19	37.43	37.41	35.59	35.29	38.10	37.60	33.25	40.05
Ba/Th	17.66	13.18	35.85	41.95	22.00	585	30.00	63.33	90.00	96.67	115	135	165	42.50	26.00	258	32.86	23.73	65.00	150.00	89.55
Nb/U	8.06	8.35	44.80	49.49	21.50	20.00	1.26	34.00	17.00	34.00	21.00	23.00	22.00	7.00	3.73	3.08	15.00	5.96	13.67	19.00	6.55
Ce/Pb	55.15	121	27.06	34.60	8.67	3.65	4.82	9.12	2.21	10.23	16.67	6.87	2.61	17.31	16.69	10.00	8.25	52.87	30.71	15.86	31.91
Nb/Ta	14.47	12.05	15.62	17.29	4.78	20.00	14.50	17.00	17.00	17.00	10.50	11.50	11.00	11.20	14.00	18.50	15.00	11.46	20.50	21.11	14.40
Th/U	5.75	6.00	3.05	2.91	2.50	2.00	0.13	3.00	1.00	3.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	0.50	0.33	0.42	2.33	3.00	0.67	1.00	3.00
Ba/Rb	2.24	2.69	7.07	8.47	3.93	2.37	4.74	5.00	3.60	2.96	5.35	7.30	41.25	4.59	6.50	2.25	15.33	3.42	14.44	4.84	5.31
Ba/Cs	17.07	10.61	188	233	110	73.13	30.00	63.33	30.00	15.26	57.50	54.00	25.38	5.31	4.64	71.67	230	52.35	32.50	50.00	126
Rb/Cs	7.60	3.95	26.58	27.49	28.00	30.88	6.33	12.67	8.33	5.16	10.75	7.40	0.62	1.16	0.71	31.83	15.00	15.32	2.25	10.33	23.68
Zr/Sm	26.62	21.86	26.01	24.19	34.28	35.05	24.82	31.35	32.29	39.69	31.35	33.09	31.04	31.42	31.35	40.86	24.99	29.78	30.57	19.66	28.72
Hf/Nd	0.13	0.11	0.16	0.15	0.36	0.30	0.24	0.25	0.24	0.31	0.27	0.26	0.26	0.22	0.22	0.40	0.21	0.21	0.21	0.19	0.19
Y/Yb	8.69	8.92	12.35	10.99	9.38	9.30	10.32	10.03	10.19	9.70	9.90	10.16	10.06	10.07	10.61	8.63	8.79	9.56	8.77	9.23	10.35
Ta/Yb	0.44	0.52	0.76	0.78	0.27	0.03	0.05	0.06	0.05	0.05	0.06	0.07	0.06	0.09	0.08	0.06	0.11	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15
Nb/Yb	6.32	6.26	11.90	13.47	1.27	0.64	0.71	0.98	0.90	0.86	0.68	0.75	0.71	1.05	1.15	1.17	1.60	1.68	0.16	0.14	0.18
Th/Yb	4.51	4.50	0.81	0.79	0.15	0.06	0.07	0.09	0.05	0.08	0.06	0.07	0.06	0.07	0.10	0.16	0.25	0.84	0.07	0.00	0.86
Zr/TiO2	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.07	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.01
Nb/Y	0.73	0.70	0.96	1.23	0.14	0.07	0.07	0.10	0.09	0.09	0.07	0.07	0.07	0.10	0.11	0.14	0.18	0.18	0.16	0.14	0.18
Th/Ta	10.32	8.67	1.06	1.02	0.56	2.00	1.50	1.50	1.00	1.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.80	1.25	2.50	2.33	5.77	1.00	1.11	6.60
Ti/V	71.52	68.97	164	147.18	4.84	58.16	45.14	56.47	51.84	50.26	48.44	47.65	48.29	54.63	54.49	62.94	50.53	122.14	57.45	54.48	103

Table 2. Sm–Nd isotopic data of studied rocks.

Sample/Anal. No	t (Ma)	147Sm/144Nd(0)	147Sm/144Nd(t)	143Nd/144Nd(0)	2σ	143Nd/144N(t)	TDM(Ga)	εNd(0)	εNd(t)
JAK-1	240.0	0.2317	0.2320	0.513063	0.000005	0.5127	−0.74	8.33	7.26
JAK-2	240.0	0.1959	0.1963	0.513039	0.000005	0.5127	0.95	7.86	7.89
MR-1	240.0	0.2080	0.2084	0.513060	0.000007	0.5127	2.41	8.27	7.93
BRT-1	240.0	0.1857	0.1860	0.512930	0.000006	0.5126	1.20	5.74	6.08
COL-1	240.0	0.2099	0.2103	0.512770	0.000008	0.5124	14.74	2.61	2.21
DO-K-4	240.0	0.2099	0.2103	0.513046	0.000006	0.5127	4.18	8.00	7.60
DO-113	240.0	0.2249	0.2253	0.512956	0.000008	0.5126	−2.66	6.24	5.38
DO-16	250.0	0.1121	0.1123	0.512169	0.000005	0.5120	1.47	−9.11	−6.41
DO-18	240.0	0.1525	0.1527	0.512817	0.000005	0.5126	0.83	3.53	4.89
SUG-10	240.0	0.1721	0.1724	0.512672	0.000006	0.5124	1.75	0.70	1.46
VFK-1	240.0	0.1791	0.1794	0.513030	0.000009	0.5127	0.53	7.69	8.23

Table 3. Data used in Concordia age Zrn and Rt calculations. An additional set of isotopic data is in Table S2.

Sample/Spot	U	Th/U	f206	207Pb/235U	±σ	206Pb/238U	±σ	ρ	207Pb/235U	±σ	206Pb/238U	±σ
Zircon	(ppm)	(%)	(%)	(%)	Age (Ma)	(Ma)	Age (Ma)	(Ma)
DOL-1/06	580.4	0.592	0.07	0.2636	2.07	0.0379	1.51	0.73	237.5	4.4	239.9	3.6
DOL-1/10	280.4	0.302	0.11	0.2734	3.26	0.0387	1.55	0.47	245.4	7.1	244.8	3.7
DOL-1/14	441.1	0.243	0.14	0.2785	2.64	0.0391	1.53	0.58	249.5	5.9	247.5	3.7
DOL-1/24	768.3	0.476	0.32	0.2863	2.06	0.0397	1.51	0.73	255.7	4.7	251.0	3.7
DOL-1/31	657.4	0.741	0.01	0.2772	2.29	0.0386	1.50	0.66	248.5	5.1	244.2	3.6
JAK-1/02	1272.0	0.726	0.06	0.3095	1.66	0.0433	1.52	0.91	273.8	4.0	273.2	4.1
JAK-1/17	422.0	0.337	0.10	0.3056	1.93	0.0427	1.69	0.87	270.8	4.6	269.2	4.5
JAK-1/27	1630.1	0.084	0.06	0.3027	1.67	0.0426	1.55	0.93	268.5	3.9	268.9	4.1
JAK-1/06	443.1	1.079	0.20	0.2912	1.92	0.0416	1.54	0.80	259.5	4.4	262.6	4.0
JAK-1/16	509.2	0.659	0.19	0.2992	1.74	0.0416	1.57	0.90	265.8	4.1	262.5	4.0
JAK-1/05	557.0	1.181	0.16	0.2915	1.80	0.0412	1.56	0.87	259.7	4.1	260.3	4.0
JAK-5A/01	762.2	0.390	0.07	0.2620	2.15	0.0389	1.50	0.70	236.3	4.5	246.2	3.6
JAK-5A/02	878.0	0.824	0.10	0.2682	2.10	0.0382	1.53	0.73	241.3	4.5	241.7	3.6
JAK-5A/06	2402.3	0.237	0.07	0.2893	1.72	0.0419	1.50	0.87	258.0	3.9	264.8	3.9
JAK-5A/07	830.4	0.361	0.08	0.3015	2.28	0.0419	1.54	0.68	267.6	5.4	264.4	4.0
JAK-5A/08	264.9	0.374	0.62	0.2620	4.79	0.0375	1.50	0.31	236.3	10.2	237.2	3.5
JAK-5A/10	1074.6	0.698	0.25	0.2738	2.43	0.0388	1.50	0.62	245.8	5.3	245.2	3.6
JAK-5A/18	861.9	0.505	0.61	0.2725	2.45	0.0385	1.55	0.63	244.7	5.3	243.6	3.7
JAK-5A/21	617.6	0.363	1.54	0.2977	3.01	0.0388	1.53	0.51	264.6	7.0	245.2	3.7
JAK-5A/22	802.5	0.093	0.39	0.2760	2.71	0.0389	1.52	0.56	247.5	6.0	246.2	3.7
JAK-5A/23	439.9	0.426	1.36	0.2768	3.51	0.0386	1.50	0.43	248.2	7.7	244.0	3.6
Sample/Spot	U	Th/U	238U/206Pb	±σ	207Pb/206Pb	±σ	238U/206Pb	±σ
Rutile	(ppm)	(%)	(%)	Age (Ma)	(Ma)
JAK-1/06	11.9	0.002	49.8006	3.36	0.1439	10.85	112.7	6.3
JAK-1/07	9.4	0.071	40.7995	3.77	0.2897	5.61	108.6	7.3
JAK-1/08	32.3	0.000	61.4157	3.68	0.0760	9.66	100.4	4.6
JAK-1/09	33.4	0.001	60.8511	3.72	0.0880	9.49	99.8	4.8
JAK-1/10	23.3	0.069	53.9990	5.09	0.1943	1.95	96.5	5.5
JAK-1/11	13.9	0.000	58.7107	5.54	0.1503	13.60	94.8	8.0
JAK-1/16	101.7	0.013	53.3180	3.19	0.0889	8.82	113.7	4.8
JAK-1/17	21.2	0.000	49.8471	5.06	0.1100	4.75	118.1	6.8

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

MDPI and ACS Style

Putiš, M.; Soták, J.; Li, Q.-L.; Ondrejka, M.; Li, X.-H.; Hu, Z.; Ling, X.; Nemec, O.; Németh, Z.; Ružička, P. Origin and Age Determination of the Neotethys Meliata Basin Ophiolite Fragments in the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Accretionary Wedge Mélange (Inner Western Carpathians, Slovakia). Minerals 2019, 9, 652. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9110652

AMA Style

Putiš M, Soták J, Li Q-L, Ondrejka M, Li X-H, Hu Z, Ling X, Nemec O, Németh Z, Ružička P. Origin and Age Determination of the Neotethys Meliata Basin Ophiolite Fragments in the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Accretionary Wedge Mélange (Inner Western Carpathians, Slovakia). Minerals. 2019; 9(11):652. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9110652

Chicago/Turabian Style

Putiš, Marián, Ján Soták, Qiu-Li Li, Martin Ondrejka, Xian-Hua Li, Zhaochu Hu, Xiaoxiao Ling, Ondrej Nemec, Zoltán Németh, and Peter Ružička. 2019. "Origin and Age Determination of the Neotethys Meliata Basin Ophiolite Fragments in the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Accretionary Wedge Mélange (Inner Western Carpathians, Slovakia)" Minerals 9, no. 11: 652. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9110652

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

For more information on the journal statistics, click here.

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.

We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.