Assessing short summaries with human judgments procedure and latent semantic analysis in narrative and expository texts (original) (raw)

References

• Brown, A. L., &Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 1–14.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1986).Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Owen, P. D., &Coté, N. C. (1990). Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 566–581.
  Article Google Scholar
• Escudero, I. (2004).Procesamiento de inferencias elaborativas en la comprensión del discurso y según el tipo de texto [Elaborative inference processing in discourse comprehension and type of text]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Fletcher, C. R., Chrysler, S. T., van den Broek, P., Deaton, J. A., & Bloom, C. P. (1995). The role of co-occurrence, coreference, and causality in coherence of conjoined sentences. In R. F. Lorch, Jr. & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.),Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 203–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W. (1996). Latent semantic analysis for text-based research.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 197–202.
  Article Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W., Gilliam, S., &Kendall, S. (2000). Supporting contentbased feedback in on-line writing evaluation with LSA.Interactive Learning Environments,8, 111–127.
  Article Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., &Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis.Discourse Processes,25, 285–307.
  Article Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., &Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 379–401.
  Article Google Scholar
• Goldman, S., &Bisanz, G. (2002). Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.),The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., &Trabasso, T. (1994). “Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.”Psychological Review,101, 371–395.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Harter, D., Person, N., &the Tutoring Research Group (2000). Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor.Interactive Learning Environments,8, 129–147.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., &Trueman, M. (1983). The effects of headings in text on recall, search and retrieval.ritish Journal of Educational Psychology53, 205–214.
  Google Scholar
• Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., Matthews, C., Lamb, R., &the LSA Research Group (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback.Interactive Learning Environments,8, 87–109.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kucan, L., &Beck, I. L. (1996). Four fourth graders thinking aloud: An investigation of genre effects.Journal of Literacy Research,28, 259–287.
  Article Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning and representing verbal meaning: The latent semantic analysis theory.Current Directions in Psychological Science,7, 161–164.
  Article Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., &Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.Psychological Review,104, 211–240.
  Article Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., &Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis.Discourse Processes,25, 259–284.
  Article Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. W. (1998).Computer-based grading of the conceptual content of essays. Unpublished manuscript.
• Landauer, T. K., &Psotka, J. (2000). Simulating text understanding for educational applications with Latent Semantic Analysis: Introduction to LSA.Interactive Learning Environments,8, 73–86.
  Article Google Scholar
• León, J. A., &Carretero, M. (1995). Intervention in comprehension and memory strategies: Knowledge and use of text structure.Learning & Instruction,5, 203–220.
  Article Google Scholar
• León, J. A., Escudero, I., &van den Broek, P. (2003). La influencia del género del texto en el establecimiento de inferencias elaborativas [The influence of type of text on the establishment of elaborative inferences]. In J. A. León (Ed.),Conocimiento y discurso: Claves para inferir y comprender (pp. 153–170). Madrid: Pirámide.
  Google Scholar
• León, J. A., &Peñalba, G. E. (2002). Understanding causality and temporal sequence in scientific discourse. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.),The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 155–178). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• León, J. A., & the Reading Literacy Research Group (2004).La competencia lectora y los procesos de comprensión: Un proyecto de investigación basado en la evaluación de los tipos de comprensión [Reading literacy and reading processes: A research project on assessment of types of comprehension]. Unpublished manuscript.
• León, J. A., &Slisko, J. (2000). La dificultad comprensiva de los textos de ciencias: Nuevas alternativas para un viejo problema educativo [The difficulty of understanding science texts: New alternatives for an old education problem].Psicología Educativa,6, 7–26.
  Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Millis, K. K., Muñoz, B. D., &McNamara, D. [S.] (2002). Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,34, 181–188.
  Article Google Scholar
• Martins, I. (2002). Visual imagery in school science texts. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.),The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 73–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Millis, K. K., Kim, H.-J. J., Todaro, S., Magliano, J. P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., &McNamara, D. S. (2004). Identifying reading strategies using latent semantic analysis: Comparing semantic benchmarks.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 213–221.
  Article Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., &Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition & Instruction,1, 117–175.
  Article Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1998). The limits of co-occurrence: Tools and theories in language research.Discourse Processes,25, 363–377.
  Article Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. (1988).arrative knowing and the human sciences Albany: State University of New York Press.
  Google Scholar
• Rehder, B., Schreiner, M. E., Wolfe, M. B. W., Laham, D., Landauer, T. K., &Kintsch, W. (1998). Using latent semantic analysis to assess knowledge: Some technical considerations.Discourse Processes,25, 337–354.
  Article Google Scholar
• Steyvers, M., Shiffrin, R. M., &Nelson, D. L. (2005). Word association spaces for predicting semantic similarity effects in episodic memory. In A. F. Healy (Ed.),Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 237–249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., Secco, T., &van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.),Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–107). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B. W. (2005). Memory for narrative and expository text: Independent influences of semantic associations and text organization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 359–364.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references