Distractor interference stays constant despite variation in working memory load (original) (raw)
References
- Chen, Z. (2000). An object-based cost of visual filtering.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 482–495.
Article Google Scholar - Chen, Z. (2003). Attention focus, processing load, and Stroop interference.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 888–900.
Article Google Scholar - Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 87–114.
Article Google Scholar - de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., &Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention.Science,291, 1803–1806.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Article Google Scholar - Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Article Google Scholar - Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M., &Nakayama, K. (1997). Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task.Nature,387, 805–807.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 47–70.
Article Google Scholar - Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
Article Google Scholar - LaBerge, D., Brown, V., Carter, M., Bash, D., &Hartley, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 65–76.
Article Google Scholar - Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
Article Google Scholar - Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 75–82.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Lavie, N., &de Fockert, J. [W.] (2005). The role of working memory in attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 669–674.
Article Google Scholar - Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., &Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 339–354.
Article Google Scholar - Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 32–63.
Article Google Scholar - Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., &Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 1302–1321.
Article Google Scholar - Woodman, G. F., &Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 269–274.
Article Google Scholar - Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., &Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.Psychological Science,12, 219–224.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Article Google Scholar