Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks (original) (raw)

References

• Abramson, M., &Goldinger, S. D. (1997). What the reader’s eye tells the mind’s ear: Silent reading activates inner speech.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1059–1068.
  Article Google Scholar
• Braitenberg, V. (1989). Some arguments for a theory of cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In L. Nadel, L. A. Cooper, P. Culicover, & R. M. Harnish (Eds.),Neural connections, mental computation (pp. 137–145). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
  Article Google Scholar
• Content, A., Mousty, P., &Radeau, M. (1990). BRULEX: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. [BRULEX: A computerized lexical data base for the French language].L’Année Psychologique,90, 551–566.
  Article Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., &Bowers, J. S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 119–132.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T., Roelofs, A., &Fieuws, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 264–271.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., &Wilce, L. S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words.Applied Psycholinguistics,1, 371–385.
  Article Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., &Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35, 116–124.
  Article Google Scholar
• Frauenfelder, U. H., Segui, J., &Dijkstra, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phonemic processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 77–91.
  Article Google Scholar
• Frost, R., &Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition.Memory & Cognition,17, 302–310.
  Article Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Repp, B. H., &Katz, L. (1988). Can speech perception be influenced by simultaneous presentation of print?Journal of Memory & Language,27, 741–755.
  Article Google Scholar
• Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Auditory lexical decision.Language & Cognitive Processes,11, 559–567.
  Article Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: The importance of rhyme.Journal of Research in Reading,22, 217–240.
  Article Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (2002a). In the beginning was the rhyme? A reflection on Hulme, Hatcher, Nation, Brown, Adams, and Stuart (2002).Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,82, 47–57.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (2002b). Phonology, reading development and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective.Annals of Dyslexia,52, 141–163.
  Article Google Scholar
• Halle, P. A., Chereau, C., &Segui, J. (2000). Where is the /b/ in “absurde” [apsyrd]? It is in French listeners’ minds.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 618–639.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hebb, D. O. (1988). The first stage of perception: Growth of the assembly. In J. A. Anderson & E. Rosenfeld (Eds.),Neurocomputing: Foundations of research (pp. 45–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Jakimik, J. A., Cole, R. A., &Rudnicky, A. I. (1985). Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,24, 165–178.
  Google Scholar
• Jared, D., McRae, K., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 687–715.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kessler, B., Treiman, R., &Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 145–171.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kirtley, C., Bryant, P., MacLean, M., &Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,48, 224–245.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.),Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning: Advances in psychology (Vol. 94, pp. 167–178): Oxford: Elsevier, North-Holland.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Bates, E., Powell, T., &Wulfeck, B. (1997). Single-word shadowing and the study of lexical access.Applied Psycholinguistics,18, 157–180.
  Article Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., &Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). It’s good ... but is it ART?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 336.
  Article Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Jared, D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 43–65.
  Article Google Scholar
• Metsala, J. L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 47–56.
  Article Google Scholar
• Metsala, J. L., &Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.),Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., &Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?Cognition,7, 323–331.
  Article Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., &Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur l’internet: LEXIQUE. [A lexical database of contemporary French on the Internet: LEXIQUE].L’Année Psychologique,101, 447–462.
  Article Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., &Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 299–325.
  Article Google Scholar
• Olson, D. R. (1996). Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing.Cognition,60, 83–104.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Peereman, R., Content, A., &Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 151–174.
  Article Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., &Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions.Journal of Memory & Language,41, 416–426.
  Article Google Scholar
• Radeau, M., &Morais, J. (1990). The uniqueness point effect in the shadowing of spoken words.Speech Communication,9, 155–164.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., &Davis, M. H. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 307–314.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rueckl, J. G. (2002). The dynamics of visual word recognition.Ecological Psychology,14, 5–19.
  Article Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 546–554.
  Article Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.
  Article Google Scholar
• Slowiaczek, L. M., Soltano, E. G., Wieting, S. J., &Bishop, K. L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 233–262.
  Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., &Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 337–359.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1248–1268.
  Article Google Scholar
• Taft, M., &Hambly, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 320–335.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,8, 513–520.
  Article Google Scholar
• Taraban, R., &McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 608–631.
  Article Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C. (2002). Nonlinear dynamics and psycholinguistics.Ecological Psychology,14, 1–4.
  Article Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C., &Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1269–1291.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ventura, P., Kolinsky, R., Brito-Mendes, C., &Morais, J. (2001). Mental representations of the syllable internal structure are influenced by orthography.Language & Cognitive Processes,16, 393–418.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ventura, P., Morais, J., Pattamadilok, C., &Kolinsky, R. (2004). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition.Language & Cognitive Processes,19, 57–95.
  Article Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 270–278.
  Article Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., &Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words.Psychological Science,9, 325–329.
  Article Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., &Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 374–408.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., &Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 683–689.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., &Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 504–515.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., &Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 779–793.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references