Phonology in the bilingual Stroop effect (original) (raw)

References

• Brauer, M. (1998). Stroop interference in bilinguals: The role of similarity between the two languages. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.),Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 317–337). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-C., &Ho, C. (1986). Development of Stroop interference in Chinese—English bilinguals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 397–401.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., &Martin, R. C. (1998). Is visual lexical access based on phonological codes? Evidence from a picture—word interference task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 91–95.
  Article Google Scholar
• Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., &Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access.Memory & Cognition,6, 391–402.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dyer, F. N. (1971). Color-naming interference in monolinguals and bilinguals.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 297–302.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fang, S. P., Tzeng, O. J. L., &Alva, L. (1981). Intralanguage vs. interlanguage Stroop effects in two types of writing systems.Memory & Cognition,9, 609–617.
  Article Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., &Turvey, M. T. (1980). Words written in Kana are named faster than the same words written in Kanji.Language & Speech,23, 141–147.
  Google Scholar
• Francis, W. S. (1999). Cognitive integration of language and memory in bilinguals: Semantic representation.Psychological Bulletin,125, 193–222.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails.Psychological Bulletin,123, 71–99.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming.American Journal of Psychology,77, 576–588.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kolers, P. A. (1966). Interlingual facilitation of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 314–319.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., &Sankaranarayanan, A. (1998). A model of bilingual representation and its implications for second language acquisition. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.),Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 365–395). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., &Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 149–174.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 331–353.
  Article Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Mägiste, E. (1984). Stroop tasks and dichotic translation: The development of interference patterns in bilinguals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 304–315.
  Article Google Scholar
• Morikawa, Y. (1981). Stroop phenomena in the Japanese language: The case of ideographic characters (Kanji) and syllabic characters (Kana).Perceptual & Motor Skills,53, 67–77.
  Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. C., &Delaney, S. M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 59–70.
  Article Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Potter, M. C., So, K.-F., Von Eckardt, B., &Feldman, L. B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and more proficient bilinguals.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 23–38.
  Article Google Scholar
• Preston, M. S., &Lambert, W. E. (1969). Interlingual interference in a bilingual version of the Stroop color—word task.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 295–301.
  Article Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.Psychological Review,110, 88–125.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Spinks, J. A., Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., &Tan, L. H. (2000). Reading Chinese characters for meaning: The role of phonological information.Cognition,76, B1-B11.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., Sneg, R., &Baruch, O. (1996). Unintentional word reading via the phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross-script homophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 336–349.
  Article Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references