Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers (original) (raw)

References

• Balakrishnan, J. D., &Ashby, F. G. (1992). Subitizing: Magical numbers or mere superstition.Psychological Research,54, 80–90.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Brannon, E. M., &Terrace, H. S. (2000). Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,26, 31–49.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Brannon, E. M., Wusthoff, C. J., Gallistel, C. R., &Gibbon, J. (2001). Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale.Psychological Science,12, 238–243.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1999).The mathematical brain. London: MacMillan.
  Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1998). Knowledge of number: Its evolution and ontogeny.Science,282, 641–642.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (2001). Cognitive foundations of arithmetic: Evolution and ontogenesis.Mind & Language,16, 37–55.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., &Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain.Trends in Neuroscience,21, 355–361.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., &Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 626–641.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fetterman, J. G. (1993). Numerosity discrimination: Both time and number matter.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,19, 149–164.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R., &Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.Cognition,44, 43–74.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R., &Gelman, R. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 59–65.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R., Gelman, R., & Cordes, S. (in press). The cultural and evolutionary history of the real numbers. In S. Levinson & P. Jaisson (Eds.),Culture and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gelman, R. (1993). A rational-constructivist account of early learning about numbers and objects. In D. Medin (Ed.),Learning and motivation (Vol. 30, pp. 61–96). Academic Press: New York.
  Google Scholar
• Gelman, R., &Cordes, S. (2001). Counting in animals and humans. In E. Dupoux (Ed.),Language, brain and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 279–303). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Gelman, R., &Meck, E. (1992). Early principles aid early but not later conceptions of number. In J. Bideaud, C. Meljac, & J. P. Fischer (Eds.),Pathways to number ( pp. 171–189). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Gibbon, J., &Church, R. M. (1981). Time left: Linear versus logarithmic subjective time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 87–107.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., &Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 52–77). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
  Google Scholar
• Hauser, M., &Carey, S. (1998). Building a cognitive creature from a set of primitives: Evolutionary and developmental insights. In E.D. D. Cummins, E. C. Allen, et al. (Eds.),The evolution of mind (pp. 51–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Joram, E., Subrahmanyam, K., &Gelman, R. (1998). Measurement estimation: Learning to map the route from number to quantity and back.Review of Educational Research,68, 413–449.
  Google Scholar
• Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P. D., &Scholl, B. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: Developing What and Where systems.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2, 10–18.
  Article Google Scholar
• Logie, R. H., &Baddeley, A. D. (1987). Cognitive processes in counting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 310–326.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mandler, G., &Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,11, 1–22.
  Article Google Scholar
• Meck, W. H., &Church, R. M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 320–334.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality.Nature,215, 1519–1520.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. (1973). Determinants of reaction time for digit inequality judgments.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,1, 167–168.
  Google Scholar
• Platt, J. R., &Johnson, D. M. (1971). Localization of position within a homogeneous behavior chain: Effects of error contingencies.Learning & Motivation,2, 386–414.
  Article Google Scholar
• Reynvoet, B., &Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line.Cognition,72, 191–201.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rumbaugh, D. M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S., &Hegel, M. T. (1987). Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,13, 107–115.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Simon, T. J. (1999). The foundations of numerical thinking in a brain without numbers.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,3, 363–364.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. (2000). Core knowledge.American Psychologist,55, 1233–1243.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Starkey, P., &Cooper, R. G. (1995). The development of subitizing in young children.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,13, 399–420.
  Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. (1956). The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes— Loudness.American Journal of Psychology,69, 1–25.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stevens, S., &Harris, J. R. (1962). The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness.Journal of Experimental Psychology,64, 489–494.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Trick, L. M., &Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently?A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review,101, 80–102.
  Google Scholar
• Washburn, D. A. (1994). Stroop-like effects for monkeys and humans: Processing speed or strength of association?Psychological Science,5, 375–379.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Whalen, J., Gallistel, C. R., &Gelman, R. (1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation.Psychological Science,10, 130–137.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references