Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure (original) (raw)

References

• Burton, A. M., Young, A. W., Bruce, V., Johnston, R. A., &Ellis, A.W. (1991). Understanding covert recognition.Cognition,39, 129–166.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Devlin, the Hon. Lord Patrick (1976).Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
  Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., Levinson, K. L., &Klein, K. L. (1995). Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia.Neuropsychologia,33, 661–674.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J. M., &Parkin, A. J. (1990). Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 579–583.
  Article Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A. G., &Chance, J. E. (1970). Visual recognition memory for complex configurations.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 237–241.
  Article Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. B., &Fink, S. I. (1981). Selective attention in vision: Recognition memory for superimposed line drawings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 954–967.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., &Burton, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 330–337.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R., Burton, A. M., &Ellis, A.W. (2002). Long-term effects of covert face recognition.Cognition,86, B43-B52.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception.Nature Neuroscience,3, 759–763.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. T. (1980). Is conscious attention necessary for long-term storage?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 379–390.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. T., Cocklin, T., &Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1982). Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory.American Journal of Psychology,95, 183–198.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (2000). Selective attention and cognitive control: Dissociating attentional functions through different types of load. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 175–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (2001). Capacity limits in selective attention: Behavioral evidence and implications for neural activity. In J. Braun, C. Koch, & J. L. Davis (Eds.),Visual attention and cortical circuits (pp. 49–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., &Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of visual selective attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection.Psychological Science,8, 395–398.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., Ro, T., &Russell, C. (2003). The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.Psychological Science,14, 510–515.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Mack, A., &Rock, I. (1998).Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Reinitz, M. T., Morrissey, J., &Demb, J. (1994). Role of attention in face encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 161–168.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ro, T., Russell, C., &Lavie, N. (2001). Changing faces: A detection advantage in the flicker paradigm.Psychological Science,12, 94–99.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rock, I., &Gutman, D. (1981). The effect of inattention on form perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 275–285.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rock, I., Schauer, R., &Halper, F. (1976). Form perception without attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 429–440.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Scapinello, K. F., &Yarmey, A. D. (1970). The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli.Psychonomic Science,21, 329–331.
  Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., &Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 225–245.
  Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., &Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 583–592.
  Article Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification?American Psychologist,48, 553–571.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J. W., &Fulero, S. M. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research.American Psychologist,55, 581–598.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wojciulik, E., Kanwisher, N., &Driver, J. (1998). Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study.Journal of Neurophysiology,79, 1574–1578.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 141–145.
  Article Google Scholar
• Young, A. W., &Burton, A. M. (1999). Simulating face recognition: Implications for modelling cognition.Cognitive Neuropsychology,16, 1–48.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references