Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation (original) (raw)

References

• Awh, E., &Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 834–846.
  Article Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory or working attention. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.),Attention: Selection, awareness, and control. A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 152–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
  Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory.Neuropsychology,8, 485–493.
  Article Google Scholar
• Castiello, U., &Umiltà, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 837–848.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cave, K. R., &Bichot, N. P. (1999). Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 204–223.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N. J., Cave, K. R., Bichot, N. P., &Kim, M.-S. (1998). Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 727–746.
  Article Google Scholar
• Clarkson-Smith, L., &Hartley, A. A. (1990). The game of bridge as an exercise in working memory and reasoning.Journals of Gerontology,45, P233-P238.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., &Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 331–335.
  Article Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity,Behavioral & Brain Science,24, 87–185.
  Article Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
  Article Google Scholar
• Egly, R., &Homa, D. (1984). Sensitization in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 778–793.
  Article Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., &Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled attention view of working memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 169–183.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., &Benton, S. L. (1988). The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking.Contemporary Educational Psychology,13, 33–44.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. F., &Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field.Psychological Science,6, 381–386.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kyllonen, P. C., &Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?Intelligence,14, 389–433.
  Article Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.
  Article Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review,63, 81–96.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,11, 56–60.
  Article Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
  Article Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (1991). Who is likely to acquire programming skills?Journal of Educational Computing Research,7, 1–24.
  Article Google Scholar
• Toothaker, L. E. (1993).Quantitative applications in the social sciences: Multiple comparison procedures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  Google Scholar
• Turner, M., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references