On the relationship between categorical frequency estimation and cued recall (original) (raw)

References

• Alba, J. W., Chromiak, W., Hasher, L., &Attig, M. S. (1980). Automatic encoding of category size information.Joumal of experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 370–378.
  Article Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., &Ross, B. H. (1986). The roles of automatic and strategic processing in sensitivity to superordinate and property frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 116–134.
  Article Google Scholar
• Battig, W., & Montague, W. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80(3, Pt. 2).
• Begg, I., Maxwell, D., Mitterer, J. 0., &Harris, G. (1986). Estimates of frequency: Attribute or attribution?Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 496–508.
  Article Google Scholar
• Begg, I., &Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 553–563.
  Article Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. E. (1985). Judgments of category frequency.American Journal of Psychology,98, 363–372.
  Article Google Scholar
• Greene, R. L. (1984). Incidental learning of event frequency.Memory & Cognition,12, 90–95.
  Google Scholar
• Greene, R. L. (1986). The effects of intentionality and strategy on memory for frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 489–495.
  Article Google Scholar
• Greene, R. L. (1988). Generation effects in frequency Judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. & Cognition,14, 298–304.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hanson, C., &Hirst, W. (1988). Frequency encoding of token and type information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 289–297.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. II, pp. 47–91. New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L., Grandy, C. A., &Gold, E. (1981). Memory for frequency: A comparison of two multiple-trace theories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 231–240.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L., Nozawa, G., &Irmscher, M. (1982). Frequency as a nonpropositional attribute of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 127–141.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L., &Stern, L. D. (1978). Contextual variability and memory for frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 539–549.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hunt, K. P., &Hodge, M. H. (1971). Category-item frequency and category-name meaningfulness (m'): Taxonomic norms for 84 categories.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements,4(6, Whole No. 54), 97–121.
  Google Scholar
• McFarland, C. E., Jr.,Frey, T. J., &Rhodes, D. D. (1980). Retrieval of internally versus externally generated words in episodic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 210–255
  Article Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification Learning_Psychological Review_,76, 165–178.
  Google Scholar
• Mueller, C. W., &Watkins, M. J. (1977). Inhibition from part-set cueing: A cue-overload interpretation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 699–709.
  Article Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. D., &Puff, C. R. (1982). Free recall: Basic methodology and analysis. In C. R. Puff (Ed.),Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition (pp. 99–128). New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S., Pusen, C., &Widner, R. L., Jr. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,13, 183–191.
  Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S., &Widner, R. L., Jr. (1987). Generation effects with nonwords: The role of test appropriateness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 164–171.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research.Memory & Cognition,12, 531–552.
  Google Scholar
• Puff, C. R. (1974). A consolidated theoretical view of stimulus-list organization effects in free recall.Psychological Reports,34, 275–288.
  Google Scholar
• Slamecka, N. J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.
  Article Google Scholar
• Slamecka, N. J., &Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 589–607.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology,5, 207–232.
  Article Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. J. (1975). Inhibition in recall with extralist “cues.”Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 294–303.
  Article Google Scholar
• Williams, K. W., &Durso, F. T. (1986). Judging category frequency: Automaticity or availability?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 387–396.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references