Cross-series adaptation using song and string (original) (raw)
Reference Note
1. Samuel, A. G. Personal communication, December 13, 1979.
Ganong, W. F., III.An experiment on “phonetic adaptation” (Progress Report, Vol. 116, pp. 206-210). Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics, 1975. Google Scholar
References
Ades, A. E. Source assignment and feature extraction in speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 673–685. Article Google Scholar
Cole, R. A., &Cooper, W. E. Perception of voicing in English affricates and fricatives.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975,58, 1280–1287. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Cooper, F. S., Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., &Grubb, P. M. Some input-output relations observed in experiments on the perception of speech.Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Cybernetics. Namur, Belgium: Association International de Cybernétique, 1958. Google Scholar
Cooper, F. S., &Mattingly, I. G. Computer controlled PCM system for investigation of dichotic speech perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969,46, 115(A). Article Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Selective adaptation to speech. In F. Restle, R. M. Shiffrin, N. J. Castellan, H. R. Lindman, & D. B. Pisoni (Eds.),Cognitive theory (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975. Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E.Speech perception and production. Norwood, N.J: Ablex, 1979. Google Scholar
Cutting, J. E., &Rosner, B. S. Categories and boundaries in speech and music.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 564–570. Google Scholar
Cutting, J. E., &Rosner, B. S. Discrimination functions predicted from categories in speech and music.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,20, 87–88. Google Scholar
Cutting, J. E., Rosner, B. S., &Foard, C. F. Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: Implications for theories of speech perception.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976,28,361–378. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Diehl, R. Feature analyzers for the phonetic dimension stop vs. continuant.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 267–272. Google Scholar
Diehl, R. L., Elman, J. L., &Mccusker, S. B. Contrast effects on stop consonant identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 599–609. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Eimas, P. D., &Corbit, J. D. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 99–109. Article Google Scholar
Eimas, P. D., &Miller, J. L. Effects of selective adaptation on the perception of speech and visual patterns: Evidence for feature detectors. In R. D. Walk & H. L. Pick, Jr. (Eds.),Perception and experience. New York: Plenum Press, 1978. Google Scholar
Gerstman, L. J.Perceptual dimensions for the frication portion of certain speech sounds. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1957.
Liberman, A. M. Some characteristics of perception in the speech mode. In D. A. Hamburg (Ed.),Perception and its disorders: Proceedings of the Association for Research on Nervous and Mental Disorders. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1970. Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review, 1967,74,421–461. Article Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. D., &Turvey, M. T. Language codes and memory codes. In W. A. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1972. Google Scholar
Lisker, L., &Abramson, A. S. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements.Word, 1964,20, 384–422. Google Scholar
Lisker, L., &Abramson, A. S. Distinctive features and laryngeal control.Language, 1971,47, 767–785. Article Google Scholar
Locke, S., &Kellar, L. Categorical perception in a nonlinguistic mode.Cortex, 1973,9, 355–369. PubMed Google Scholar
Macneilage, P. F. Motor control of serial ordering of speech.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 182–196. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Miller, J. D., Weir, C. C, Pastore, R. E., Kelly, W. J., &Dooling, R. J. Discrimination and labelling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: An example of categorical perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976,60,410–417. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B. Identification and discrimination of the relative onset of two component tones: Implications for voicing perception in stops.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,61,1352–1361. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B. Adaptation of the relative onset time of two-component tones.Perception & Psychophysics, in press.
Remez, R. E. An hypothesis of event-sensitivity in the perception of speech and bass violins. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1978.
Remez, R. E. Adaptation of the category boundary between speech and nonspeech: A case against feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology, 1979,11,38–57. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Remez, R. E. Susceptibility of a stop consonant to adaptation on a speech-nonspeech continuum: Further evidence against feature detectors in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,27, 17–23. Google Scholar
Samuel, A. G., &Newport, E. L. Adaptation of speech by nonspeech: Evidence for complex acoustic cue detectors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 563–578. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Schelleng, J. C. The bowed string and the player.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973,53, 26–41. Article Google Scholar
Simon, H. J., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978,64, 1338–1357. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In E. E. David & P. B. Denes (Eds.),Human communication: A unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972. Google Scholar