Stimulus intensity and information processing (original) (raw)

Reference Notes

1. Hines, T., & Posner. M. I.Slow but sure: A chronometric analysis of the process of aging. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C., September 1976.
2. Posner, M. I.Chronometrie explorations of mind. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum. in preparation.
3. Sanders, A. F.Structural and functional aspects of the reaction process. Paper presented at the Attention and Performance VI conference. 1975.
4. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. C.Attending to a position in space. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Denver. November 1975.

References

• Angel, A. Input-output relations in simple reaction time experiments.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,25, 193–200.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Barlow, H. B., &Levick, W. R. Changes in maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina.Journal of Physiology, 1969,202, 699–718.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. R., &Doty, R. W., Sr. Response of units in striate cortex of squirrel monkeys to visual and electrical stimuli.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1974,37, 621–641.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Bartlett, N. R. A comparison of manual reaction times as measured by three sensitive indices.Psychological Record, 1963,13, 51–56.
  Google Scholar
• Baumeister, A., Dugas, J., &Erdberg, P. Effects of warning signal intensity, reaction signal intensity, preparatory interval, and temporal uncertainty on reaction times of mental defectives.Psychological Record, 1967,17, 503–507.
  Google Scholar
• Baumeister, A., Hawkins, W., &Kellas, G. The interactive effects of stimulus intensity and intelligence upon reaction time.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1965,69, 526–530. (a)
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Baumeister, A., Hawkins, W., &Kellas, G. Reaction speed as a function of stimulus intensity in normals and retardates.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965,20, 649–652. (b)
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Beck, S. Eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, UCS intensity, and Manifest Anxiety Scale score.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,66, 429–438.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Becker, C. A., &Killion, T. H. Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 389–401.
  Article Google Scholar
• Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., Yerre, C., &Kissin, B. Evoked potential correlates of expected stimulus intensity.Science, 1973,179, 814–816.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Behar, I., &Adams, C. Some properties of the reaction-time ready-signal.American Journal of Psychology, 1966,79, 419–426.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Bernstein, I. H., Chu, P. K., Briggs, P., &Schurman, D. L. Stimulus intensity and foreperiod effects in intersensory facilitation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,25, 171–181.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Bernstein, I. H., Futch, D. G., &Schurman, D. L. Some exposure duration effects in simple reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 317–322.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Biederman, I., &Kaplan, R. Stimulus discriminability and S-R compatibility: Evidence for independent effects in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,86, 434–439.
  Article Google Scholar
• Botwinick, J. Joint effects of stimulus intensity and preparatory interval on simple auditory reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,80, 348–352.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Botwinick, J. Sensory-set factors in age differences in reaction time.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1971,119, 241–249.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Boynton, R. M., &Whitten, D. N. Visual adaptation in monkey cones: Recordings of late receptor potentials.Science, 1970,170, 1423–1426.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Brebner, J., &Tiivas, K. Choice RT with signals of unequal intensity.Australian Journal of Psychology, 1975,27, 47–50.
  Article Google Scholar
• Brown, K. T., Watanabe, K., &Murakami, M. The early and late receptor potentials of monkey cones and rods.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1965,30, 457–482.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Cattell, J. McK. The influence of the intensity of the stimulus on the length of the reaction time.Brain, 1886,8, 512–515.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chocholle, R. Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l’intensité à diverses frequences.Annales de Psychologie, 1945,41, 65–124.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cleland, B. G., &Enroth-Cugell, C. Quantitative aspects of gain and latency in the cat retina.Journal of Physiology, 1970,206, 73–91.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Cone, R. A. The early receptor potential of the vertebrate retina.Nature, 1964,204, 736–739.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Debecker, J., &Zanen, A. Intensity functions of the early receptor potential and of the melanin fast photo-voltage in the human eye.Vision Research, 1975,15, 101–106.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grant, D. A., &Schneider, D. E. Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: I. The conditioned eyelid response to light.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948,38, 690–696.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grant, D. A., &Schneider, D. E. Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: II. The conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditorystimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949,39, 35–40.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grice, G. R. Stimulus intensity and response evocation.Psychological Review, 1968,75, 359–373.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grice, G. R. Application of a variable criterion model to auditory reaction time as a function of the typeof catch trial.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 103–107.
  Google Scholar
• Grice, G. R., Hunt, R.L., Kushner, B.A., &Morrow, C. Stimulus intensity, catch trial effects and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time:A variable criterion theory interpretation.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 758–770.
  Google Scholar
• Grice, G. R., Hunt, R. R., Kushner, B. A., &Nullmeyer, R. Associative processes and strategies in disjunctive reaction time.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 433–445.
  Google Scholar
• Grice, G. R., &Hunter, J. J. Stimulus intensity effects depend upon the type of experimental design.Psychological Review, 1964,71, 247–256.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hartline, H. K. The response of single optic nerve fibers of the vertebrate eye to illumination of the retina.American Journal of Physiology, 1938,121, 400–415.
  Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. Simple reaction time, statistical decision theory, and the speed-slowness tradeoff.Psychonomic Science, 1970,21, 323–324.
  Google Scholar
• Henriksen, K. Effects of false feedback and stimulus intensity on simple reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 287–292.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. H. Effects of adaptation on the lateral geniculate response to light increment and decrement.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1965,55, 1535–1540.
  Article Google Scholar
• John, I. D. Intensity of non-key stimuli in the Donder’s c-type reaction.Australian Journal of Psychology, 1966,18, 148–153.
  Article Google Scholar
• John, I. D. A statistical decision theory of simple reaction time.Australian Journal of Psychology, 1967,19, 27–34.
  Article Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., &Boies, S. J. Processing demands of sequential information.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 85–90.
  Google Scholar
• Kellas, G. Effects of preparatory intervals and stimulus intensity on reaction times of normal and regarded individuals.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,68, 303–307.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kellas, G., Baumeister, A. A., &Wilcox, S. J. Interactive effects of preparatory intervals, stimulus intensity, and experimental design on reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,80, 311–316.
  Article Google Scholar
• Keuss, P. J. G. Reaction time to the second of two shortly spaced auditory signals both varying in intensity.Acta Psychologica, 1972,36, 226–238.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kietzman, M. L., &Gillam, B. J. Visual temporal integration and simple reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 333–340.
  Google Scholar
• Klingaman, R. L., &Anch, A. M. Human auditory evoked response intensity functions from monopolar and bipolar scalp recordings.Psychonomic Science, 1972,29, 17–19.
  Google Scholar
• Kohfeld, D. L. Stimulus intensity and adaptation level as determinants of simple reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,76, 468–473.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kohfeld, D. L. Effects of ready-signal intensity and intensity of the preceding response signal on simple reaction time.American Journal of Psychology, 1969,82, 104–110. (a)
  Article Google Scholar
• Kohfeld, D. L. Effects of the intensity of auditory and visual ready signals on simple reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,82, 88–95. (b)
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Koster, W. G., &Peacock, J. B. The influence of intensity of visual stimuli on the PRP. In W.G. Koster (Ed.).Attention and performance II, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1969. (Reprinted from_Acta Psychologica_, 1969,30.)
  Google Scholar
• Laberge, D. On the processing of simple visual and auditory stimuli at distinct levels.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 331–334.
  Google Scholar
• Lappin, J. S., &Disch, K. The latency operating characteristic: II. Effects of visual stimulus intensity on choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,93, 367–372.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Levick, W. R. Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells.Vision Research, 1973,13, 837–853.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 14–57.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Mansfield, R. J. W. Latency functions in human vision.Vision Research, 1973,13, 2219–2234.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Mansfield, R. J. W. Psychophysics and the neural basis of information processing. In H.-G. Geissler & Yu. M. Zabrodin (Eds.),Advances in psychophysics, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1976.
  Google Scholar
• Marrocco, R. T. Maintained activity of monkey optic tract fibers and lateral geniculate nucleus cells.Vision Research, 1972,12, 1175–1181.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Marrocco, R. T. Possible neural basis of brightness magnitude estimations.Brain Research, 1975,86, 128–133.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• McGill, W. J. Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.).Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley. 1963.
  Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. Rabbit & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V, New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  Google Scholar
• Miller, J. O., &Pachella, R. Locus of the stimulus probability effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,101, 227–231.
  Article Google Scholar
• Murray, H. G. Stimulus intensity and reaction time: Evaluation of a decision-theory model.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 383–391.
  Article Google Scholar
• Murray, H.G., &Kohfeld, D. L. Role of adaptation level in stimulus intensity dynamism.Psychonomic Science, 1965,3, 439–440.
  Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 648–654.
  Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement?Psychological Review, 1973,80, 489–509.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Niemi, P. The locus of stimulus intensity effects in auditory and visual reaction processes. Unpublished master’s thesis. Turku University, 1975.
• Nissenm, M. J. M. Facilitation and selection: Two modes of sensory interaction. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Oregon. 1974.
• Pachella, R. G., &Fisher, D. F. Effect of stimulus degradation and similarity on the trade-off between speed and accuracy in absolute judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 7–9.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pachella, R. G., &Miller, J. O. Stimulus probability and same-different classification.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 29–34.
  Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. Psychobiology of attention. In M. Gazzaniga & C. Blakemore (Eds.).Handbook of psychobiology, New York: Academic Press. 1975.
  Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., &Boies, S. J. Components of attention.Psychological Review,1971,78, 391–408.
  Article Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Klein, R. M., Summers, J. J., &Buggie, S. On the selection of signals.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 2–12.
  Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Klein, R. M. Visual dominance: An information processing account of its origins and significance.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 157–171.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium, Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1975.
  Google Scholar
• Raab, D., &Fehrer, E. Supplementary report: The effect of stimulus duration and luminance on visual reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 326–327.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Raab, D., Fehrer, E., &Hershenson, M. Visual reaction time and the Broca-Sulzer phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,61, 193–199.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sanders, A. F. The foreperiod effect revisited.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 591–598.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. Criterion effects in simple reaction time: Results with stimulus intensity and duration manipulations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,95, 370–374.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Schechter, G., &Buchsbaum, M. The effects of attention, stimulus intensity and individual differences on the average evoked response.Psychophysiology, 1973,10, 392–400.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Schwent, V. L., Hillyard, S. A., &Galambos, R. Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential: II. Effects of signal intensity and masking noise.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1976,40, 615–622.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Speiss, J. Effects of preknowledge and stimulus intensity upon simple reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,101, 109–115.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stebbins, W. C. &Miller, J. M. Reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity for the monkey.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964,7, 309–312.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. The discovery of processing stages. In W. G. Koster (Ed.),Attention and performance II, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1969. (Reprinted from_Acta Psychologica_, 1969,30.)
  Google Scholar
• Stone, J., &Fabian, M. Summing properties of the cat’s retinal ganglion cells.Vision Research, 1968,8, 1023–1040.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stone, J., &Fukuda, Y. Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: A comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1974,37, 722–748.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Teas, D. C., &Kiang, N. Evoked responses from the auditory cortex.Experimental Neurology, 1964,10, 91–119.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Teichner, W. H., &Krebs, M. J. Laws of the simple visual reaction time.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 344–358.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tepas, D. I., &Armington, J. C. Properties of evoked visual potentials.Vision Research, 1962,2, 449–461.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tepas, D. I., Boxerman, L. A., &Anch, A. M. Auditory evoked brain responses: Intensity functions from bipolar human scalp recordings.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 217–2211.
  Google Scholar
• Thrane, V. Sensory and preparatory factors in response latency: I. The visual intensity function.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1960,1, 82–96. (a)
  Article Google Scholar
• Thrane, V. Sensory and preparatory factors in response latency: II. Simple reaction or compensatory interaction?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1960,1, 169–176. (b)
  Article Google Scholar
• Thrane, V. Sensory and preparatory factors in response latency: III. Preknowledge and regularity of stimuli as antecedent variables.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1961,2, 30–44.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ueno, T. Reaction time as a measure of temporal summation at suprathreshold levels.Vision Research, 1977,17, 227–232.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Vaughan, H. G., Costa, L. D., &Gilden, L. The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity.Vision Research, 1966,6, 645–656.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Vaughan, H. G., &Hull, R. C. Functional relation between stimulus intensity and photically evoked cerebral responses in man.Nature, 1965,206, 720–722.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wandell, B. A. Speed-accuracy tradeoff in visual detection: Application of neural counting and timing.Vision Research, 1977,17, 217–225.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Winters, W., &Hamasaki, D. I. Comparison of LGN and optic tract intensity-response functions.Vision Research, 1972,12, 589–608.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wundt, W.Grundzuge der physiologischen Psychologic, Leipzig: Engelmann, 1874.
  Google Scholar

Download references