Ganong, W. F. An experiment on ‘phonetic adaptation.’Quarterly Progress Report, Research Laboratory of Electronics, M.I.T., 1975.
Pisoni, D. B., Sawusch, J. R., & Adams, F. T. Simple and contingent adaptation effects in speech perception.Research on Speech Perception, 1975,2, 22–55. Google Scholar
References
Ades, A. E. How phonetic is selective adaptation? Experiments on syllable position and vowel environment.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 61–66. Google Scholar
Ades, A. E. Adapting the property detectors for speech perception. R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1976. Google Scholar
Ades, A. E. Source assignment and feature extraction in speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 673–685. Article Google Scholar
Bailey, P.Perceptual adaptation in speech: Some properties of detectors for acoustical cues to phonetic distinctions. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, 1975. Google Scholar
Blumstein, S. E., Stevens, K. N., &Nigro, G. N. Property detectors for bursts and transitions in speech perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,61, 1301 -1313. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Bock, R. D., &Jones, L. V.The measurement and prediction of judgement and choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1968. Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Contingent feature analysis in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 201–204. (a) Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Adaptation of phonetic feature analyzers for place of articulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,56, 617–627. (b) ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Selective adaptation to speech. In F. Restle, R. M. Shiffrin, J. N. Castellan, H. Lindman, & D. B. Pisoni (Eds.),Cognitive Theory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975. Google Scholar
Diehl, R. The effect of selective adaptation on the identification of speech sounds.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 48–52. Google Scholar
Diehl, R., Elman, J. L., &Mccusker, S. B. Contrast effects on stop consonant identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1978,4, 599–609. Article Google Scholar
Eimas, P. D., &Corbit, J. D. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 99–109. Article Google Scholar
Howell, P. Syllabic and phonemic representations for short-term memory of speech stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,24, 496–500. Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 431–461. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Miller, J. E., &Eimas, P. D. Studies on the selective tuning of feature detectors for speech perception.Journal of Phonetics, 1976,4, 119–127. Google Scholar
Sawusch, J. R., &Pisoni, D. B. Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,23, 125–131. Google Scholar
Simon, H. J., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978,64, 1338–1357. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Tartter, V. C., &Eimas, P. D. The Role of auditory and phonetic feature detectors in the perception of speech.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 293–298. Google Scholar