The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis (original) (raw)
References
Breland, H. M. (1996). Word frequency and word difficulty: A comparison of counts on four corpora.Psychological Science,7, 96–99. Article Google Scholar
Buchanan, L., Burgess, C., &Lund, K. (1996). Overcrowding in semantic neighborhoods: Modeling deep dyslexia.Brain & Cognition,32, 111–114. Google Scholar
Burgess, C. (1998).From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Burgess, C., &Hollbach, S. C. (1988). A computational model of syntactic ambiguity as a lexical process. In_Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Cognitive Science Society Meeting_ (pp. 263–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Burgess, C., &Lund, K. (1994). Multiple constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A connectionist account of psycholinguistic data. In_Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society_ (pp. 90–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Burgess, C., &Lund, K. (1997a). Modeling cerebral asymmetries of semantic memory using high-dimensional semantic space. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.),Getting it right: The cognitive neuroscience of right hemisphere language comprehension (pp. 215–244). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Burgess, C., &Lund, K. (1997b). Modeling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space.Language & Cognitive Processes,12, 177–210. Article Google Scholar
Burgess, C., &Lund, K. (1997c). Representing abstract words and emotional connotation in high-dimensional memory space. In_Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society_ (pp. 61–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Burgess, C., Lund, K., &Kromsky, A. (1997). Examining issues in developmental psycholinguistics with a high-dimensional memory model.Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society,2, 66. Google Scholar
Burgess, C., Tanenhaus, M. K., &Hoffman, M. (1994). Parafoveal and semantic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution. In_Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society_ (pp. 96–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects.Mind,11, 63–65. Article Google Scholar
Chiarello, C. (1988). Lateralization of lexical processes in the brain: A review of visual half-field research. In H. A. Whitaker (Ed.),Contemporary reviews in neuropsychology (pp. 36–76). New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Clark, S. E., &Burchett, R. E. R. (1994). Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall.Memory & Cognition,22, 55–62. Google Scholar
Dobbs, A. R., Friedman, A., &Lloyd, J. (1985). Frequency effects in lexical decisions: A test of the verification model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 81–92. Article Google Scholar
Dupuy, H. J. (1974). The rationale, development, and standardization of a basic word vocabulary test.Vital & Health Statistics,2, 71. Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
Francis, W. N., &Kučera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281. Article Google Scholar
Graf, P., &Williams, D. (1987). Completion norms for 40 three-letter word stems.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,19, 422–445. Google Scholar
Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., &Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 189–195. Google Scholar
Hyönä, J., &Olson, R. K. (1995). Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1430–1440. Article Google Scholar
Jurado, M. A., Junque, C., Pujol, J., Oliver, B., &Vendrell, P. (1997). Impaired estimation of word occurrence frequency in frontal lobe patients.Neuropsychologia,35, 635–641. Article Google Scholar
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press. Google Scholar
Livesay, K., &Burgess, C. (1997). Mediated priming: A representational and empirical account using the HAL model. In_Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society_ (pp. 436–441). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Lovelace, E. A. (1988). On using norms for low-frequency words.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 410–412. Google Scholar
Lund, K., &Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 203–208. Google Scholar
Lund, K., &Burgess, C. (1997, December).Recurrent neural networks and global co-occurrence models: Developing contextual representations of word meaning. Paper presented at the NIPS*97 (Neural Information Processing Systems) Neural Models of Concept Learning postconference workshop, Breckenridge, CO.
Lund, K., Burgess, C., &Atchley, R. A. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space. In_Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society_ (pp. 660–665). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Lund, K., Burgess, C., &Audet, C. (1996). Dissociating semantic and associative word relationships using high-dimensional semantic space. In_Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society_ (pp. 603–608). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution.Language & Cognitive Processes,9, 157–201. Article Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.Psychological Review,101, 676–703. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 159–188. Article Google Scholar
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review,76, 165–178. Article Google Scholar
Plaut, D. C. (1996). Relearning after damage in connectionist networks: Toward a theory of rehabilitation.Brain & Language,52, 25–82. Article Google Scholar
Rudell, A. P. (1993). Frequency of word usage and perceived word difficulty: Ratings of Kucera and Francis words.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 455–463. Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P., &Shoben, E. (1985). The influence of sentence constraints on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 232–252. Article Google Scholar
Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., &Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 876–900. Article Google Scholar
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., &Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions.Psychological Review,81, 214–241. Article Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., &Carlson, G. N. (1989). Lexical structure and language comprehension. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process (pp. 529–561). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press. Google Scholar
Troia, G. A., Roth, F. P., &Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (1996). Word frequency and age effects in normally developing children’s phonological processing.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,39, 1099–1108. Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., &Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 285–318. Article Google Scholar