Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? (original) (raw)

References

• Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 802–814.
  Article Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?Journal of Lxperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 234–254.
  Article Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 243–293). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
  Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.
  Article Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., &Richman, B. (1971).The American Heritage word frequency book. New York: American Heritage.
  Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Feustel, T. C., Shiferin, R. M., &Salasoo, A. (1983), Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112. 309–346.
  Article Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.),New approaches in language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1987). Form priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 674–691.
  Article Google Scholar
• Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., &Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 501–518.
  Article Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 228–244.
  Article Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacoas, A. M., &Seoul, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 189–195.
  Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., &Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 191–198.
  Google Scholar
• Gumbel, E. J. (1958).Statistics of extremes. New York: Columbia University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Howes, D. H., &Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 401–410.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kčera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., &Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 119–131.
  Article Google Scholar
• Laxon, V. J., Coltheart, V., &Keating, C. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too: Words with many orthographic neighbors are easier to read and spell.British Journal of Educational Psvchology.58. 103–119.
  Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A. (1986).Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon (Research on speech perception Tech. Rep. No. 6). Bloomington: Indiana University, Speech Research Laboratory, Psychology Department.
  Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., &Goldinger, S. D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 122–147). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Luo, C. R.. & Snodgrass, J. G. (1993).What factors affect perceptual interference? Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Mcclelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–405.
  Article Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., Mcdonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.).Attention and performance XII: The psychology of rending (pp. 223–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., Mcdonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., &Mcclelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G. (1991, November).Perceptual fluency and recognition memory—What's the connection? Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco.
• Snodgrass, J. G., &Hirshman, E. (1991). Theoretical explorations of the Bruner-Potter (1964) interference effect.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 273–293.
  Article Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., &Poster, M. (1992). Visual-word recognition thresholds for screen-fragmented names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures.Behavior Research Methods, instruments, & Computers,24, 1–15.
  Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for naming agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
  Article Google Scholar
• Taraban, R., &McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 608–631.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., Schacter, D., &Stark, H. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 336–342.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references