A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number (original) (raw)

References

• Averbach, E. The span of apprehension as a function of exposure duration.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963,2, 60–64.
  Article Google Scholar
• Beckwith, M., &Restle, F. Process of enumeration.Psychological Review, 1966,73, 437–444.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Bourdon, B. Sur le temps nécessaire pour nominer les nornbres.Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger, 1908,33, 426–431.
  Google Scholar
• Crossman, E. R. F. W. The measurement of discriminability.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956,7, 176–195.
  Google Scholar
• Fernberger, S. W. A preliminary study of the range of visual apprehension.American Journal of Psychology, 1921,32, 121–133.
  Article Google Scholar
• Freeman, F. N. Grouped objects as concrete basis for the number idea.Elementary School Teacher, 1912,12, 306–314.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hunter, W. S., Sigler, M. The span of visual discrimination as a function of time and intensity of stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1940,26, 160–179.
  Article Google Scholar
• Indow, T., Ida, M. Scaling of dot numerosity.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22, 265–276.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., &Volkman, J. The discrimination of visual number.American Journal of Psychology, 1949,62, 498–525.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. The time required for judgments of numerical inequality.Nature, 1967,215, 1519–1520.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
  Google Scholar
• Parducci, A. Range-frequency compromise in judgment.Psychological Monographs, 1963,77 (2, Whole No. 565).
• Taves, E. H. Two mechanisms for the perception of visual numerousness.Archives of Psychology, 1941, No. 265.
• Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927,34, 273–286.
  Article Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. Fechner’s law and the method of equalappearing intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1929,12, 214–224.
  Article Google Scholar
• Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.
  Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S., &Schlosberg, H.Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1954.
  Google Scholar

Download references