The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming (original) (raw)

References

• Besner, D., &McCann, R. S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology or reading (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Davis, C., &Forster, K. I. (1994). Masked orthographic priming: The effect of prime-target legibility.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 673–697.
  Google Scholar
• Drews, E., &Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1098–1116.
  Article Google Scholar
• Egeth, H. E., &Santee, J. L. (1981). Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 506–517.
  Article Google Scholar
• Evett, L. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 325–350.
  Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., &Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 353–372.
  Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., &Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 365–382.
  Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1993). Form-priming and temporal integration in word recognition. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. C. Shillcock (Eds.),Cognitive models of speech processing. The Sperlonga Meeting, II. (pp. 467–495). Howe, U.K.: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., &Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 680–698.
  Article Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., &Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 211–251.
  Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1998). On localist connectionism and psychological science. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.),Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 1–38). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (in press). Temporal integration of information in orthographic priming.Visual Cognition.
• Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification.Cognitive Psychology,22, 517–560.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Imbs, P. (1971).Etudes statistiques sur le vocabulaire français: Dictionnaire des fréquences. Vocabulaire littéraire des XIXe et XXe siècles. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.
  Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., &Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1174–1188.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., Grainger, J., &Ferrand, L. (1995). The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1101–1110.
  Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., &Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-p: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.),Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147–188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nazir, T. A., Jacobs, A. M., &O’regan, J. K. (1998). Letter legibility and visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,26, 810–821.
  Google Scholar
• O’regan, J. K., &Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effects in word recognition: A challenge to current theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 185–197.
  Article Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Peressotti, F., &Grainger, J. (1995). Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 875–890.
  Google Scholar
• Peressotti, F., Job, R., Rumiati, R., &Nicoletti, R. (1995). Levels of representation in visual word recognition.Visual Cognition,2, 421–450.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words.Perception,8, 21–30.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effect in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Segui, J., &Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 65–76.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references