The importance of being first: A tachistoscopic study of the contribution of each letter to the recognition of four-letter words (original) (raw)
References
Aderman, D., & Smith, E. E. Expectancy as a determinant of functional units in perceptual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1971, 2, 117–129. Article Google Scholar
Bishop, C. H. Transfer effects of words and letter training in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1964, 3, 215–221. Article Google Scholar
Black, J. W. The information of sounds and phonetic digrams of one- and two-syllable words. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 1954, 19, 397–411. Google Scholar
Broerse, A. C., & Zwaan, E. J. The information value of initial letters in the identification of words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 441–446. Article Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., & O’Dowd, D. A note on the informativeness of parts of words. Language & Speech, 1958, 1, 98–101. Google Scholar
Chall, J. S. Learning and not learning to read: Current issues and trends. In F. A. Young and D. B. Lindsley (Eds.),Early experience and visutal information processing in perceptual and reading disorders. Washington, D.C: National Academy of Sciences, 1970. Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W., Pollack, M. D., & Montague, W. E. Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 84, 502–507. Article Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J.Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967. Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J., Osser, H., & Pick, A. D. A study in the development of grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1963, 2, 142–146. Article Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J., Pick, A., Osser, H., & Hammond, M. The role of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in the perception of words. American Journal of Psychology, 1962, 75, 554–570. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J., Shurcliff, A., & Yonas, A. The role of pronounce-ability in perception of pseudo-words by hearing and deaf subjects. Project Literacy Reports, 1966, No. 7, 62–72. Google Scholar
Huey, E. B.The psychology’and pedagogy of reading. New York: MacMillan, 1908. Reprinted Cambridge, Mass:M.I.T. Press, 1968. Google Scholar
Isom, J. B. An interpretation of dyslexia-a medical viewpoint. In G. D. Spache (Ed.),Reading disability and perception. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Convention, International Reading Association, Newark, Delaware, 1969.
Jones, M. H. Some thoughts on perceptual units in language processing. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.),The psycholinguisric nature of the reading process. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1965. Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A., & Katzman, M. T. Naming sequentially presented letters and words. Language & Speech, 1966, 9, 84–95. Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K. Rate of implicit speech. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1962, 15, 546. Article Google Scholar
Melville, J. R. Word-length as a factor in differential recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 1957, 70, 316–318. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Oléron, P. Sur le: stratégies dans l’identification des mots. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 1970, 3, 313–323. Google Scholar
Reicher, G. M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 81, 275–280. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Ruddell, R. The relation of regularity of gapheme-phoneme correspondences and language structure to achievement in first grade reading. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.),The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1965. Google Scholar
Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, Y. Short-time processing of information. HFORL Report TR-54-6. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1954. Google Scholar
Weit, R. H., & Venezky, R. L. Spelling-to-sound patterns. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.),The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1968. Google Scholar
Wheeler, D. D. Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 59–85. Article Google Scholar