Familiarity and pop-out in visual search (original) (raw)

References

• Brand, J. (1971). Classification without identification in visual search.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,23, 178–186.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Egeth, H., Jonides, J., &Wall, S. (1972). Parallel processing of multielement displays.Cognitive Psychology,3, 674–698.
  Article Google Scholar
• Enns, J. T. (1990). Three-dimensional features that pop-out in visual search. In D. Brogan (Ed.),Visual search: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Visual Search (pp. 37–45). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  Google Scholar
• Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1990). Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search.Psychological Science,1, 323–326.
  Article Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (1974). A curious effect with reversed letters explained by a theory of schema.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 113–116.
  Google Scholar
• Gordon, I. E. (1968). Interaction between items in visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 348–355.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• He, Z. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search.Nature,359, 231–233.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Jonides, J., &Gleitman, H. (1972). A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 457–460.
  Google Scholar
• Julesz, B. (1984). Toward an axiomatic theory of preattentive vision. In G. M. Edelman, W. E. Gall, & W. M. Cowan (Eds.),Dynamic aspects of neocortical function (pp. 585–711). New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Karni, A., &Sagi, D. (1991). Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: Evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,88, 4966–4970.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kleffner, D. A., &Ramachandran, V. S. (1992). On the perception of shape from shading.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 18–36.
  Google Scholar
• Miller, E. K., Li, L., &Desimone, R. (1991). A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex.Science,254, 1377–1379.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nakayama, K., &Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions.Nature,320, 264–265.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S. (1988). Perceiving shape from shading.Scientific American,259, 76–83.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Reicher, G. M., Snyder, C. R. R., &Richards, J. T. (1976). Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2, 522–530.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Richards, J. T., &Reicher, G. M. (1978). The effect of background familiarity in visual search: An analysis of underlying factors.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 499–505.
  Google Scholar
• Sabra, A. I. (1989).The optics of Ibn Al-Haytham (English trans.). London: Warburg Institute, University of London.
  Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–58.
  Article Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information procession: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review,84, 127–188.
  Article Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision.Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing,31, 156–177.
  Article Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The 14th Bartlett Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
  Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., &Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 285–310.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references