Interaction of signal discriminability and task type in vigilance decrement (original) (raw)
References
Binford, J. R., &Loeb, M. (1966). Changes within and over repeated sessions in criterion and effective sensitivity in an auditory vigilance task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,72, 339–345. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Bowers, J. C. (1983).Stimulus homogeneity and the event rate function in sustained attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
Broadbent, D. E., &Gregory, M. (1963). Vigilance considered as a statistical decision.British Journal of Psychology,54, 309–323. PubMed Google Scholar
Buckner, D. N., &Mcgrath, J. J. (1963). A comparison of performance on single and dual sensory mode vigilance tasks. In D. N. Buckner & J J. McGrath (Eds.),Vigilance: A symposium ew York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Campbell, A. J. (1985). Processing strategies and letter spacing in the simultaneous- and successive-display matching tasks.Canadian Journal of Psychology,39, 162–173. Google Scholar
Craig, A. (1979). Nonparametric measures of sensory efficiency for sustained monitoring tasks.Human Factors,21, 69–78. PubMed Google Scholar
Craig, A. (1985). Signal detection theory and probability matching apply to vigilance.Proceedings of the Human Factors Society,29, 9–13. Google Scholar
Craig, A., Colquhoun, W. P., &Corcoran, D. W. J. (1976). Combining evidence presented simultaneously to the eye and ear: A comparison of some predictive models.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 473–484. Google Scholar
Davies, D. R., &Parasuraman, R. (1982).The psychology of vigilance. London: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Davies, D. R., Parasuraman, R., &Toh, A. (1984). Time of day, memory load, and vigilance. In A. Mitai (Ed.),Trends in ergo nomics/human factors I. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
Dember, W. N., Joshi, A., Warm, J. S., & Scerbo, M. W. (1985, November).Effects of event rate and spatial uncertainty on performance in simultaneous and successive vigilance tasks. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
Dittmar, M., Warm, J. S., &Dember, W. N. (1985). Effects of knowledge of results on performance in successive and simultaneous discrimination vigilance tasks’ A signal detection analysis. In R. E. Eberts & C. G. Eberts (Eds ),Trends in ergonomics/human factors II. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
Fisk, A. D., &Schneider, W (1981). Control and automatic processing during tasks requiring sustained attention: A new approach to vigilance_Human Factors_,23, 737–750. Google Scholar
Jerison, H. J., &Pickett, R. M. (1964). Vigilance: The importance of the elicited observing rate.Science,143, 970–971. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lanzetta, T. M., Warm, J. S, Dember, W. N., &Berch, D. B. (1985). Information processing load and the event rate function in sustained attention.Proceedings of the Human Factors Society,29, 1084–1085. Google Scholar
Loeb, M, &Binford, J. R. (1968) Vanation in performance on auditory and visual monitoring tasks as a function of signal and stimulus frequencies_Perception & Psychophysics_,4, 361–366. Google Scholar
Nuechterlein, K., Parasuraman, R., &Jiang, Q. (1983) Visual sustained attention: Image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decre ment over time_Science_,220, 327–329. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R. (1976) Consistency of individual differences in human vigilance performance. An abilities classification analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,61, 486–492. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R (1979) Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention_Science_,205, 924–927 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R (1985). Sustained attention: A multifactorial approach. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R. (1986). Vigilance, monitoring, and search In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol 2. Cognitive processes and performance New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R., &Davies, D R (1975). Response and evoked potential latencies associated with commission errors in visual monitoring.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 465–468. Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R., &Davies, D. R. (1977). A taxonomic analysis of vigilance performance. In R. R. Mackie (Ed.),Vigilance. Theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates New York Plenum Press. Google Scholar
Pollack, I., &Norman, D. A. (1964) A nonparametnc analysis of recognition experiments.Psychonomic Science,1, 125–126 Google Scholar
Posner, M. I (1978).Chronometrie explorations of mind Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Swfts, J A (1977) Signal detection theory applied to vigilance In R R Mackie (Ed.),Vigilance Theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates New York Plenum Press Google Scholar
Sweis, J A (1986) Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracv. Their ROCs and implied models_Psychological Bulletin_,99, 100–117. Article Google Scholar
Swets, J A, &Kristofferson ,A B (1970) Attention Annual_Reviw of Psychology_,21, 339–366 Article Google Scholar
Warm, J S., &Jerison, H J (1984). The psychophysics of vigilance In J S. Warm (Ed),Sustained attention in human performance London Wiley Google Scholar
Williges, R. C (1969). Withm-session criterion changes compared to an ideal observer in a visual monitoring task.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 61–66 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar