The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection (original) (raw)
References
Avant, L. L., &Lyman, P. J. (1975). Stimulus familiarity modifies perceived duration in prereeognition visual processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 205–213. Article Google Scholar
Avant, L. L., Lyman, P. J., &Antes, J. R. (1975). Effects of stimulus familiarity upon judged visual duration.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 253–262. Google Scholar
Avant, L. L., Lyman, P. J., Skowronski, M., &Millspaugh, J. R. (1977). Perceived tachistoscopic duration and early visual processing in preschool children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,23, 348–366. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Avant, L. L., &Thieman, A. A. (1985). On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic information.Memory & Cognition,13, 392–404. Article Google Scholar
Balota, D. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 88–104. Article Google Scholar
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Bruce, C., Desimone, R., &Gross, C. G. (1981). Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque.Journal of Neurophysiology,46, 369–384. PubMed Google Scholar
Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 387–395. Google Scholar
Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1985). Word recognition and consciousness. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 331–353). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Dember, W. N., &Warm, J. S. (1979).Psychology of perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar
Dick, A. O., &Dick, S. O. (1969). An analysis of hierarchical processing in visual perception.Canadian Journal of Psychology,23, 203–211. PubMed Google Scholar
Enns, J. T., &Prinzmetal, W. (1984). The role of redundancy in the object-line effect.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 22–32. Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1985). Precis of the modularity of mind.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,8, 1–42. Article Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A., Wolford, G., Slade, R., &Tassinary, L. (1981). Lexical access with and without awareness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 341–362. Article Google Scholar
Fraser, I. H., &Parker, D. M. (1986). Reaction time measures of feature saliency in a perceptual integration task. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.),Aspects of face processing (pp. 45–52). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar
Gyoba, J., Arimura, M., &Maruyama, K. (1980). Visual identification of line segments embedded in human face patterns.Tohoku Psychologica Folia,39, 113–120. Google Scholar
Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 1–66. Article Google Scholar
Homa, D., Haver, B, &Schwartz, T. (1976). Perceptibility of schematic face stimuli: Evidence for a perceptual Gestalt.Memory & Cognition,4, 176–185. Google Scholar
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. (1973). Visual factors in word perception.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 365–370. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1968). Methods, findings and theory in studies of visual masking.Psychological Bulletin,70, 404–425. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lanze, M., Maguire, W., &Weisstein, N. (1985). Emergent features: A new factor in the object-superiority effect?Perception & Psychophysics,38, 438–442. Google Scholar
Lieberman, H. R., &Pentland, A. P. (1982). Microcomputer-based estimate of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,14, 21–25. Google Scholar
Marcel, A. J. (1983a). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,15, 197–237. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Marcel, A. J. (1983b). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes.Cognitive Psychology,15, 238–300. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
McCauley, C., Parmelee, C. M., Sperber, R. D., &Carr, T. H. (1980). Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 265–276. Article Google Scholar
Merikle, P. M. (1982). Unconscious perception revisited.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 298–301. Google Scholar
Mermelstein, R., Banks, W., &Prinzmetal, W. (1979). Figurai goodness effects in perception and memory.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 472–480. Google Scholar
Nolan, K. A., &Caramazza, A. (1982). Unconscious perception of meaning: A failure to replicate.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,20, 23–26. Google Scholar
Perrett, D. I., Rolls, E. T., &Caan, W. (1982). Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex.Experimental Brain Research,47, 329–342. Article Google Scholar
Perrett, D. I., Smith, P. A. J., Potter, D. D., Mistun, A. J., Head, A. S., Milner, A. D., &Jeeves, M. A. (1984). Neurones responsive to faces in the temporal cortex: Studies of functional organization, sensitivity to identity, and relation to perception.Human Neurobiology,3, 197–208. PubMed Google Scholar
Perrett, D. I., Smith, P. A. J., Potter, D. D., Mistun, A. J., Head, A. S., Milner, A. D., &Jeeves, M. A. (1985). Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction.Proceedings of the Royal Society (London),B223, 293–317. Article Google Scholar
Purcell, D. G., &Stewart, A. L. (1981). A face superiority effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 312. (Abstract) Google Scholar
Purcell, D. G., &Stewart, A. L. (1985). The face detection effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 288. (Abstract) Google Scholar
Purcell, D. G., &Stewart, A. L. (1986). The face detection effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 118–120. Google Scholar
Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L., Botwin, M., &Kreigh, R. (1983). A face superiority effect: Hemiretina effects.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 185. (Abstract) Google Scholar
Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L., &Stanovich, K. E. (1983). Another look at semantic priming without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 65–71. Google Scholar
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaning-fulness of stimulus materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 275–280. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. (1985). Lateralized processes in face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,76, 249–271. PubMed Google Scholar
Rolls, E. T. (1984). Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces.Human Neurobiology,3, 209–222. PubMed Google Scholar
Rolls, E. T., Baylis, G. C., &Leonard, C. M. (1985). Role of low and high spatial frequencies in the face-selective responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey.Vision Research,25, 1021–1035. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Schiff, W. (1980).Perception: An applied approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
Sergent, J. (1983). Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries.Psychological Bulletin,93, 481–512. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Smythe, L., &Finkel, D. L. (1974). Masking of spatial and identity information from geometric forms by a visual noise field.Canadian Journal of Psychology,28, 399–408. PubMed Google Scholar
Spoehr, K. T., &Lehmkuhle, S. W. (1982).Visual information processing. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman Google Scholar
Van Santen, J. P. H., &Jonides, J. (1978). A replication of the face-superiority effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,12, 378–380. Google Scholar
Weisstein, N., &Harris, C. S. (1974). Visual detection of line segments: An object-superiority effect.Science,186, 752–755. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,1, 59–85. Article Google Scholar
Williams, M. C., &Weisstein, N. (1984). The effect of perceived depth and connectedness on metacontrast functions.Vision Research,24, 1279–1288. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar