Effects of association and imageability on phonological mapping (original) (raw)

References

• Becker, C. A., &Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 389–401.
  Article Google Scholar
• Carroll, J., Davies, P., &Richman, B. (1971).The American Heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  Google Scholar
• Clark, H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 335–339.
  Article Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., &Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.Psychological Review,100, 589–608.
  Article Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Katz, L., &Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 104–115.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J., &Foss, D. J. (1994, November).The locus of context effects in word recognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
• Kawamoto, A.,Kello, C., &Jones, R. (1994, November).Locus of the exception effect in naming. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
• Nelson, D. L.,McEvoy, C. L., &Schreiber, T. A. (1993).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript, University of South Florida.
• Schneider, W. (1990).Micro experimental laboratory [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
  Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (1992). Beyond orthographic depth in reading: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.),Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., &Harm, M. (1995, November).Division of labor and masking in a multicomponent model of word recognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
• Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.
  Article Google Scholar
• Simpson, G. B., Lorsbach, T. C., &Whitehouse, D. (1983). Encoding and contextual components of word recognition in good and poor readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,35, 161–171.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Solso, R. L., &Juel, C. L. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two-through nine-letter English words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 297–343.
  Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1979). Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention.Memory & Cognition,7, 77–85.
  Article Google Scholar
• Strain, E., Patterson, K., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single word naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1140–1154.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tabossi, P., &Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English.Memory & Cognition,20, 303–313.
  Article Google Scholar
• Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. F. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. L. (1970).The structure of English orthography. Paris: Mouton.
  Google Scholar

Download references