Word norms for blind and sighted subjects: Familiarity, concreteness, meaningfulness, imageability, imagery modality, and word associations (original) (raw)
References
Belleza, F. S., Greenwald, A. G., &Banaji, M. R. (1986). Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,18, 299–303. Google Scholar
Cornoldi, C., Calore, D., &Pra-Baldi, A. (1979). Imagery ratings and recall in congenitally blind subjects.Perceptual & Motor Skills,48, 627–639. Google Scholar
Cornoldi, C., DeBeni, R., Roncari, S., &Romano, S. (1989). The effects of imagery instructions on total congenital blind recall.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1, 321–331. Article Google Scholar
Craig, E. (1973). Role of mental imagery in free recall of deaf, blind, and normal subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 249–253. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
DeBeni, R., &Cornoldi, C. (1988). Imagery limitations in totally congenitally blind subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 650–655. Article Google Scholar
Friendly, M., Franklin, P. E., Hoffman, D., &Rubin, D. C. (1982). The Toronto word pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,14, 375–399. Google Scholar
Gilhooly, K. J., &Loche, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427. Google Scholar
Hans, M. A. (1974). Imagery and modality in paired-associate learning in the blind.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,4, 22–24. Google Scholar
Jonides, J., Kahn, R., &Rozin, P. (1975). Imagery instructions improve memory in blind subjects.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,5, 424–426. Google Scholar
Kerr, N. H. (1983). The role of vision in “visual imagery” experiments: Evidence from the congenitally blind.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 265–277. Article Google Scholar
Marchant, B., &Malloy, T. E. (1984). Auditory, tactile, and visual imagery in PA learning by congenitally blind, deaf, and normal adults.Journal of Mental Imagery,8, 19–32. Google Scholar
Paivio, A., &Okovita, H. W. (1971). Word imagery modalities and associative learning in blind and sighted subjects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 506–510. Article Google Scholar
Paivio, A.,Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(1, Pt. 2).
Rubin, D. C., &Friendly, M. (1986). Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns.Memory & Cognition,14, 79–94. Google Scholar
Schlaegel, T. F., Jr. (1953). The dominant method of imagery in blind as compared to sighted adolescents.Journal of Genetic Psychology,83, 265–277. PubMed Google Scholar
Sholl, M. J., &Easton, R. D. (1986). Effect of object familiarity on verbal learning in the sighted and the blind.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 190–200. Article Google Scholar
Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. F. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Yuille, J. C., &Barnsley, R. H. (1969). [Norms for 590 nouns.] Unpublished raw data. (Available from J. C. Yuille, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) Google Scholar
Zimler, J., &Keenan, J. M. (1983). Imagery in the congenitally blind: How visual are visual images?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 269–282. Article Google Scholar