Alpern, M. Rod-cone independence in the after-flash effect.J. Physiol., 1965, 176, 462–472. PubMed Google Scholar
Alpern, M., & Rushton, W. A. H. The specificity of the cone interaction in the after-flash effect.J. Physiol., 1965, 176, 473–482. PubMed Google Scholar
Crawford, B. H. Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli.Proc, Roy. Soc. Land., 1947, 134B, 283–302. Article Google Scholar
Donchin, E. Retroactive visual masking: effects of test flash duration on masking interval.Vision Res., 1967, 7, 79–89. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W., & Collins, J. F. Backward masking in vision.Psychon. Sci., 1964, 1, 101–102. Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W., & Collins, J. F. A reinterpretation of one form of backward and forward masking in visual perception.J. exp. Psychol., 1965, 70, 343–351. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Fehrer, E. Contribution of perceptual segregation to the relationship between stimulus similarity and backward masking.Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 21, 27–33. PubMed Google Scholar
Fehrer, E. Effect of stimulus Similarity on retroactive masking.J. exp. Psychol., 1966, 71, 612–615. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Fehrer, E., & Biederman, I. A comparison of reaction and verbal report in the detection of masked stimuli.J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 64, 126–130. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Fehrer, E., & Raab, D. Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast.J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 143–147. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Fehrer, E., & Smith, E. Effect of luminance ratio on masking.Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 14, 243–253. Article Google Scholar
Flom, M. C., Weymouth, F. W., & Kahneman, D. Visual resolution and contour interaction.J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1963, 53, 1028–1032. Google Scholar
Fry, G. A., & Bartley, S. H. The effect of one border in the visual field upon the threshold of another.Amer. J. Physiol., 1935, 112, 414–421. Google Scholar
Harrison, K., & Fox, R. Replication of reaction time to stimuli marked by metacontrast.J. exp. Psychol., 1966, 71, 162–163. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hartline, H. K., & Ratliff, F. Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of Limulus.J. gen. Physiol., 1957, 40, 357–376. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Heinemann, E. G. Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminances.J. exp. Psychol, 1955, 50, 89–96. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Johnson, E. P. The character of the B-wave in the human ERG.A.M.A. Arch. Ophthal., 1958, 60, 565–591. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. Method, findings and theory in studies of visual masking. (Submitted for publication, 1967).
Koffka, K.Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1935. Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A. Intensity and contour effects in visual masking.Vision Res., 1962, 2, 277–294. Article Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A. The illusion of movement.Scient. American, 1964, 211, 98–106. Article Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A., & Rosner, B. S. On visual masking (metacontrast): dichoptic observation,Amer. J. Psychol., 1960, 73, 2–21. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Korte, A. Kinematoskopische Untersuchungen.Z. Psychol., 1915, 72, 193–296. Google Scholar
Mackworth, J. E. The duration of the visual image.Canad. J. Psychol., 1963, 17, 62–81. Google Scholar
Mayzner, M. S., Tresselt, M. E., & Cohen, A. Preliminary findings on some effects of very fast sequential input rates on perception.Psychon. Sci., 1966, 6, 513–514. Google Scholar
Mayzner, M. S., Tresselt, M. E., Adrignolo, A. J., & Cohen, A. Further preliminary findings on some effects of very fast sequential input rates on perception.Psychon, Sci., 1967, 7, 281–282. Google Scholar
Neuhaus, V. Experimentelle Untersuchung der Scheinbewegung.Arch. f.d. ges. Psychol., 1930, 75, 315–458. Google Scholar
Penrose, L. A., & Penrose, R. Impossible objects: a special type of visual illusion.Brit. J. Psychol., 1958, 49, 31–33. PubMed Google Scholar
Pollack, R. H. Initial stimulus duration and the temporal range of apparent movement.Psychon. Sci., 1966, 5, 165–166. Google Scholar
Ratliff, F., Hartline, H. K., & Miller, W. H. Spatial and temporal aspects of retinal interactions.J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1963, 53, 110–120. Article Google Scholar
Schiller, P. H. Detection in metacontrast as determined by a method of comparisons.Percept. mot, Skills, 1965, 20, 47–50. Google Scholar
Schiller, P. H., & Chorover, S. L. Metacontrast: its relation to evoked potentials.Science, 1966, 153, 1398–1401. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Schiller, P. H., & Smith, M. Detection in metacontrast.J. exp. Psychol., 1966, 71, 32–39. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Smith, K. R. Visual apparent movement in the absence of neural interaction.Amer. J. Psychol., 1948, 61, 73–78. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychol. Monogr., 1960, 74, 1–29. Google Scholar
Spigel, J. M. (Ed.)Readings in the study of visually perceived movement. New York: Harper and Row, 1965. Google Scholar
Tach, H. H. The perceptual elaboration of stroboscopic presentations.Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 345–358. Article Google Scholar
Werner, H. Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analyses.Amer. J. Psychol., 1935, 47, 40–64. Article Google Scholar
Werner, H. Studies on contour: Strobostereoscopic phenomena.Amer. J. Psychol., 1940, 53, 418–422. Article Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung.Z. Psychol., 1912, 61, 161–265. Google Scholar
Wicke, J. D., Donchin, E., & Lindsley, D. B. Visual evoked potentials as a function of flash luminance and duration.Science, 1964, 146, 83–85. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar