Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling (original) (raw)

References

• Agresti, A. (1990).Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. A. (1995).An introduction to neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. H. (1982).Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. H. (1990). Integration psychophysics. In H.-G. Geissler (Ed.),Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 71–93). Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe & Huber.
  Google Scholar
• Ashby, F. G. (Ed.) (1992).Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R., &Maddox, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception.Psychological Review,103, 165–192.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Baker, F. B. (1992).Item response theory. New York: Marcel Dekker.
  Google Scholar
• Bamber, D., &van Santen, J. P. H. (1985). How many parameters can a model have and still be testable?Journal of Mathematical Psychology,29, 443–473.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H. (1975). Individual differences and the all-or-none vs. incremental learning controversy.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,12, 53–74.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H. (1991). Getting wise about minimum distance measures.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,35, 267–273.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H. (1998). Multinomial processing, tree models and psychological assessment.Psychological Assessment,10, 331–344.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., Chosak-Reiter, J., Shankle, W. R., &Dick, M. B. (1997). A multinomial modeling analysis of memory deficits in Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,52B, 206–215.
  Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., &Crowther, C. S. (1997). Multinomial processing tree models of factorial categorization.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,41, 45–55.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., Hu, X., &Riefer, D. M. (1994). Analysis of a model for source monitoring. In G. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.),Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology (pp. 51–65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., Kumbasar, E., &Boyd, J. P. (1997). Consensus analysis of three-way social network data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,22, 29–58.
  Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., &Riefer, D. M. (1980). Separation of storage and retrieval factors in free recall of clusterable pairs.Psychological Review,87, 375–397.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., &Riefer, D. M. (1986). The statistical analysis of a model for storage and retrieval processes in human memory.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,39, 120–149.
  Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., &Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring.Psychological Review,97, 548–564.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., Riefer, D. M., &Hu, X. (1994). Measuring memory factors in source monitoring: Reply to Kinchla.Psychological Review,101, 172–176.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., &Romney, A. K. (1986). The statistical analysis of a general Condorcet model for dichotomous choice situations. In B. Grofman & G. Owen (Eds.),Information pooling and group decision making (pp. 103–112). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., &Romney, A. K. (1988). Test theory without an answer key.Psychometrika,53, 71–92.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., &Romney, A. K. (1989). New results in test theory without an answer key. In E. Roskam (Ed.),Advances in mathematical psychology: Vol. II (pp. 229–248). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  Google Scholar
• Bäuml, K.-H. (1991). Experimental analysis of storage and retrieval processes involved in retroactive inhibition: The effect of presentation mode.Acta Psychologica,77, 103–119.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bäuml, K.-H. (1996a). A Markov model for measuring storage loss and retrieval failure in retroactive inhibition.Acta Psychologica,92, 231–250.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bäuml, K.-H. (1996b). Revisiting an old issue: Retroactive interference as a function of the degree of original and interpolated learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 380–384.
  Google Scholar
• Bayen, U. J., &Murnane, K. (1996). Aging and the use of perceptual and temporal information in source memory tasks.Psychology & Aging,11, 293–303.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., &Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 197–215.
  Article Google Scholar
• Begg, I. A., Anas, A., &Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processing in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 446–458.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bender, R. H., Wallsten, T. S., &Ornstein, P. A. (1996). Age differences in encoding and retrieving details of a pediatric examination.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 188–198.
  Google Scholar
• Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., &Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H. (1961). Application of a model to paired-associate learning.Psychometrika,26, 255–280.
  Article Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J.,Reyna, V. F.,Howe, M. L., &Kingma, J. (1990). The development of forgetting and reminiscence.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,55 (3–4, Serial No. 222).
  Google Scholar
• Brown, V. R. (1998). Comparing parallel and sequential multinomial models of letter identification. In C. Dowling, F. Roberts, & P. Theuns (Eds.),Recent progress in mathematical psychology (pp. 253–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Buchner, A., &Erdfelder, E. (1996). On assumptions of, relations between, and evaluations of some dissociation measurement models.Consciousness & Cognition,5, 581–594.
  Article Google Scholar
• Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Steffens, M. C., &Martensen, H. (1997). The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process-dissociation procedure.Memory & Cognition,25, 508–517.
  Google Scholar
• Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., &Vaterrodt-Plunnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 137–160.
  Article Google Scholar
• Buchner, A., Steffens, M. C., Erdfelder, E., &Rothkegel, R. (1997). A multinomial model to assess fluency and recollection in a sequence learning task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 631–663.
  Article Google Scholar
• Buchner, A., &Wippich, W. (1996). Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments.Consciousness & Cognition,5, 197–220.
  Article Google Scholar
• Butler, K., &Chechile, R. [A.] (1976). “Acid bath” effects on storage and retrieval PI.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,8, 349–352.
  Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. P. (1969). STEPIT—Finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters.Behavioral Science,14, 81–82.
  Google Scholar
• Chechile, R. [A.] (1977). Storage-retrieval analysis of acoustic similarity.Memory & Cognition,5, 535–540.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chechile, R. A. (1987). Trace susceptibility theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 203–222.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chechile, R. A. (1993, August).Two models for measuring fractional storage for list learning tasks. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Norman, OK.
• Chechile, R. A., &Butler, K. (1975). Storage and retrieval changes that occur in the development and release of PI.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 430–437.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chechile, R. A., &Ehrensbeck, K. (1983). Long-term storage losses: A dilemma for multistore models.Journal of General Psychology,109, 15–30.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chechile, R. A., &Meyer, D. L. (1976). A Bayesian procedure for separately estimating storage and retrieval components of forgetting.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,13, 269–295.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chechile, R. A., &Richman, C. L. (1982). The interaction of semantic memory with storage and retrieval processes.Developmental Review,2, 237–250.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chechile, R. A., Richman, C. L., Topinka, C., &Ehrensbeck, K. (1981). A developmental study of the storage and retrieval of information.Child Development,52, 251–259.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chechile, R. A., &Roder, B. (1998). Model-based measurement of group differences: An application directed toward understanding the information-processing mechanisms of developmental dyslexia. In S. A. Soraci & W. J. McIlvane (Eds.),Perspectives on fundamental processes in intellectual functioning: Vol. 1. A survey of research approaches (pp. 91–112). Norwich, CT: JAI Press.
  Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E., &Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 37–60.
  Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer.Psychological Bulletin,112, 155–159.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Corbett, A. T., &Wickelgren, W. A. (1978). Semantic memory retrieval: Analysis by speed accuracy tradeoff functions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 1–15.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Crowther, C. S., Batchelder, W. H., &Hu, X. (1995). A measurementtheoretic analysis of the fuzzy logic model of perception.Psychological Review,102, 134–148.
  Article Google Scholar
• Curran, T., &Hintzman, D. L. (1995). Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 531–547.
  Article Google Scholar
• DaPolito, F. J. (1967). Proactive effects with independent retrieval of competing responses.Dissertation Abstracts,27, 2522–2523.
  Google Scholar
• David, H. A. (1988).The method of paired comparisons (2nd ed.). London: Griffin.
  Google Scholar
• Dehn, D. M., &Engelkamp, J. (1997). Process dissociation procedure: Double dissociations following divided attention and speeded responding.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 318–336.
  Google Scholar
• Dehn, D. M., &Erdfelder, E. (1998). What kind of bias is hindsight bias?.Psychological Research,61, 135–146.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., &Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B,39, 1–38.
  Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., &Bredenkamp, J. (1998). Recognition of script-typical versus script-atypical information: Effects of cognitive elaboration.Memory & Cognition,26, 922–938.
  Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., &Buchner, A. (1998a). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 387–414.
  Article Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., &Buchner, A. (1998b). Process dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 83–96.
  Article Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., &Buchner, A. (1995). GPOWER: A general power analysis program.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 1–11.
  Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. (1977). Toward a statistical theory of reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 621–635.
  Article Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B., &Lynch, J. S. (1973). Matching bias in the selection task.British Journal of Psychology,64, 391–397.
  Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. A., Hashtroudi, S., &Johnson, M. K. (1992). Age differences using source-relevant cues.Psychology & Aging,7, 443–452.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. H., &Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.) (1995).Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  Google Scholar
• Flexser, A. J., &Tulving, E. (1978). Retrieval independence in recognition and recall.Psychological Review,85, 153–171.
  Article Google Scholar
• Garcia-Perez, M. A. (1987). A finite theory of performance in multiplechoice tests. In E. E. Roskam & R. Suck (Eds.),Progress in mathematical psychology 1 (pp. 455–464). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  Google Scholar
• Garcia-Perez, M. A. (1989). Item sampling, guessing, partial information and decision-making in achievement testing. In E. E. Roskam (Ed.),Mathematical psychology in progress (pp. 249–265). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  Google Scholar
• Garcia-Perez, M. A. (1990). A comparison of two models of performance in objective tests: Finite state versus continuous distributions.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,43, 73–91.
  Google Scholar
• Garcia-Perez, M. A. (1993). In defence of “none of the above.”British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,46, 213–229.
  Google Scholar
• Garcia-Perez, M. A., &Frary, R. B. (1991a). Finite state polynomic item characteristic curves.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,44, 45–73.
  Google Scholar
• Garcia-Perez, M. A., &Frary, R. B. (1991b). Testing finite-state models of performance in objective tests using items with “none of the above” as an option. In J.-P. Doignon & J.-C. G. Falmagne (Eds.),Mathematical psychology: Current developments (pp. 273–291). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  Google Scholar
• Gerrein, J. R., &Chechile, R. A. (1977). Storage and retrieval processes of alcohol-induced amnesia.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,86, 285–294.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Golden, R. M. (1995). Making correct statistical inferences using a wrong probability model.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,39, 3–20.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gondran, M., Minoux, M., &Vajda, S. (1984).Graphs and algorithms. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Green, D. M., &Birdsall, T. G. (1978). Detection and recognition.Psychological Review,85, 192–206.
  Article Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., James, C. T., DaPolito, F., &Polson, P. G. (1978).Associate learning: A cognitive analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  Google Scholar
• Gutowski, W. E., &Chechile, R. A. (1987). Encoding, storage, and retrieval components of associative memory deficits of mildly retarded adults.American Journal of Mental Deficiency,92, 85–93.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Hawkins, S. A., &Hastie, R. (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known.Psychological Bulletin,107, 311–327.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (1980). Simpson’s paradox and the analysis of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,87, 398–410.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (1992). Mathematical constraints and the “Tulving-Wiseman Law.”Psychological Review,99, 536–542.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (1993). On variability, Simpson’s paradox, and the relation between recognition and recall: Reply to Tulving and Flexser.Psychological Review,100, 143–148.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L. (1990). Development of a mathematical model of memory for clinical research applications in aging. In M. L. Howe, M. J. Stones, & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.),Cognitive and behavioral performance factors in atypical aging (pp. 3–36). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L. (1991). Misleading children’s story recall: Forgetting and reminiscence of the facts.Developmental Psychology,27, 746–762.
  Article Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L. (1995). Interference effects in young children’s long-term retention.Developmental Psychology,31, 579–596.
  Article Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L., &Brainerd, C. J. (1989). Development of children’s long-term retention.Developmental Review,9, 301–340.
  Article Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L., Courage, M. L., &Bryant-Brown, L. (1993). Reinstating preschooler’s memories.Developmental Psychology,29, 854–869.
  Article Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L., &Hunter, M. A. (1986). Long-term memory in adulthood: An examination of the development of storage and retrieval processes at acquisition and retention.Developmental Review,6, 334–364.
  Article Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L., Kelland, A., Bryant-Brown, L., &Clark, S. L. (1992). Measuring the development of children’s amnesia and hypermnesia. In M. L. Howe, C. J. Brainerd, & V. F. Reyna (Eds.),Development of long-term retention (pp. 56–102). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L., &O’Sullivan, J. T. (1997). What children’s memories tell us about recalling our childhood: A review of storage and retrieval processes in the development of long-term retention.Developmental Review,17, 148–204.
  Article Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L., &Rabinowitz, F. M. (1996). Reasoning from memory: A lifespan inquiry into the necessity of remembering when reasoning about class inclusion.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,61, 1–42.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hu, X., &Batchelder, W. H. (1994a, August).Empirical Bayes approach for GPT models. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Seattle.
• Hu, X., &Batchelder, W. H. (1994b). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithim.Psychometrika,59, 21–47.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Schweickert, R., Brown, G. D., Martin, S., &Stuart, G. (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,5, 1217–1232.
  Article Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. S., &Bain, J. D. (1983). Recognition memory: A cue and information analysis.Memory & Cognition,11, 583–600.
  Article Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. S., &Bowyer, P. A. (1980). Sequential testing effects and the relationship between recognition and recognition failure.Memory & Cognition,8, 271–277.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T. P. (1982). Some theories of performance in multiple choice tests and their implications for variants of the task.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,35, 71–89.
  Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Towards a user’s guide for the process-dissociation procedure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 3–26.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., &Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 139–154.
  Article Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., &Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1409–1419.
  Article Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M., &Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model.Psychological Review,99, 418–439.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Jones, G. V. (1976). A fragmentation hypothesis of memory: Cued recall of pictures and of sequential position.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,105, 277–293.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kail, R., Hale, C. A., Leonard, L. B., &Nippold, M. (1984). Lexical storage and retrieval in language-impaired children.Applied Psycholinguistics,5, 37–49.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kinchla, R. A. (1994). Comments on Batchelder and Riefer’s multinomial model for source monitoring.Psychological Review,101, 166–171.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., &Batchelder, W. H. (1996). Structural analysis of subjective categorical data.Psychometrika,61, 199–240.
  Article Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., &Oberauer, K. (1995). Testing the mental model theory of propositional reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 671–687.
  Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., &Wegener, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the “Who said what?” paradigm.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,75, 1155–1178.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kraemer, H. C., Peabody, C. A., Tinklenberg, J. R., &Yesavage, J. A. (1983). Mathematical and empirical development of a test of memory for clinical and research use.Psychological Bulletin,94, 367–380.
  Article Google Scholar
• Krauth, J. (1982). Formulation and experimental verification of models in propositional reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34, 285–298.
  Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.
  Article Google Scholar
• Light, L. L., LaVoie, D., Valencia-Laver, D., Albertson Owens, S. A., &Mead, G. (1992). Direct and indirect measures of memory for modality in young and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1284–1297.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Eyewitness suggestibility.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2, 86–89.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lindsay, D. S., Johnson, M. K., &Kwon, P. (1991). Developmental changes in memory source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,52, 297–318.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Donders, K., Hoffman, H. G., &Schooler, J. W. (1989). Creating new memories that are quickly accessed and confidently held.Memory & Cognition,17, 607–616.
  Article Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. (1959).Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. (1963). A threshold theory for simple detection experiments.Psychological Review,70, 61–79.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
  Article Google Scholar
• Marche, T. A., &Howe, M. L. (1995). Preschoolers report misinformation despite accurate memory.Developmental Psychology,31, 554–567.
  Article Google Scholar
• Massaro, D. W. (1987).Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., &Zaragoza, M. (1985). Postevent information and memory: Reply to Loftus, Schooler, and Wagenaar.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 381–387.
  Article Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J., &Krishnan, T. (1997).The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Mulder, G.,Sanders, A. F., &van Galen, G. P. (Eds.) (1995). Discrete and continuous information processing [Special issue].Acta Psychologica,90 (1–3).
  Google Scholar
• Mulligan, N. W. (1996). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1067–1087.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mulligan, N. W., &Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases or recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 280–304.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L.-G., &Gardiner, J. M. (1993). Identifying exceptions in a database of recognition failure studies from 1973 to 1992.Memory & Cognition,21, 397–410.
  Google Scholar
• Offir, J. (1972). Stochastic learning models with distributions of parameters.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,9, 404–417.
  Article Google Scholar
• Payne, D. G., &Roediger, H. L., III (1987). Hypermnesia occurs in recall but not recognition.American Journal of Psychology,100, 145–165.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952).The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.
  Book Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., Henderson, D., &Ivry, R. (1995). Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: Assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1362–1375.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, F. M., Howe, M. L., &Lawrence, J. A. (1989). Class inclusion and working memory.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,48, 379–409.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Paedagogiske Institute.
  Google Scholar
• Read, T. R. C., &Cressie, N. A. C. (1988).Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M. (1982). The advantages of mathematical modeling over traditional methods in the analysis of category clustering.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,26, 97–123.
  Article Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., &Batchelder, W. H. (1987, November).Further tests of a model for measuring storage and retrieval. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle.
• Riefer, D. M., &Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes.Psychological Review,95, 318–339.
  Article Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., &Batchelder, W. H. (1991a). Age differences in storage and retrieval: A multinomial modeling analysis.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 415–418.
  Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., &Batchelder, W. H. (1991b). Statistical inference for multinomial processing tree models. In. J.-P. Doignon & J.-C. G. Falmagne (Eds.),Mathematical psychology: Current developments (pp. 313–336). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., &Batchelder, W. H. (1995). A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm.Memory & Cognition,23, 611–630.
  Article Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., Hu, X., &Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 680–693.
  Article Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., &LaMay, M. L. (1998). Memory for common and bizarre stimuli: A storage-retrieval analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 312–317.
  Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., &Rouder, J. N. (1992). A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery.Memory & Cognition,20, 601–611.
  Google Scholar
• Rips, L. J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning.Psychological Review,90, 38–71.
  Article Google Scholar
• Romney, A. K., Batchelder, W. H., &Weller, S. C. (1987). Recent applications of consensus theory.American Behavior Scientist,31, 163–177.
  Article Google Scholar
• Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., &Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and accuracy.American Anthropologist,88, 313–338.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ross, B. H., &Bower, G. H. (1981). Comparisons of models of associative recall.Memory & Cognition,9, 1–16.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M. (1983).Stochastic processes. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., &Batchelder, W. H. (1998). Multinomial models for measuring storage and retrieval processes in paired-associate learning. In C. Dowling, F. Roberts, & P. Theuns (Eds.),Progress in mathematical psychology (pp. 195–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., &the PDP Research Group. (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Schonfield, D., &Robertson, B. A. (1966). Memory storage and aging.Canadian Journal of Psychology,20, 228–236.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.Memory & Cognition,21, 168–175.
  Google Scholar
• Skoff, B., &Chechile, R. A. (1977). Storage and retrieval processes in the serial position effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,9, 265–268.
  Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., &Bower, G. H. (1964).Attention in learning: Theory and research. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., &Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.Cognitive Psychology,14, 107–141.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., &Psotka, J. (1971). Retroactive inhibition in free recall: Inaccessibility of information available in the memory store.Journal of Experimental Psychology,87, 1–8.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., &Wiseman, S. (1975). Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,6, 79–82.
  Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, W. A., &Boer, J. P. A. (1987). Misleading postevent information: Testing parameterized models of integration in memory.Acta Psychologica,66, 291–306.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wainwright, M. J., &Reingold, E. M. (1996). Response bias correction in the process dissociation procedure: Approaches, assumptions, and evaluation.Consciousness & Cognition,5, 232–254.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.),New horizons in psychology I (pp. 135–151). Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
  Google Scholar
• Waugh, N. C., &Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory.Psychological Review,72, 89–104.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models.Econometrika,50, 1–26.
  Article Google Scholar
• White, H. (1994).Estimation, inference, and specification analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Wickens, T. D. (1982).Models for behavior: Stochastic processes in psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
  Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P., &Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Response bias and the process dissociation procedure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 422–434.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G., Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 821–835.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references