When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models of visual word recognition (original) (raw)

References

• Balota, D. A. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 88–104.
  Article Google Scholar
• Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 556–566.
  Article Google Scholar
• Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition,8, 493–512.
  Google Scholar
• Becker, C. A., &Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 389–401.
  Article Google Scholar
• Besner, D. (1983). Basic decoding components in reading: Two dissociable feature extraction processes.Canadian Journal of Psychology,38, 429–438.
  Google Scholar
• Besner, D. (1989). On the role of outline shape and word-specific visual pattern in the identification of function words: NONE.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 91–105.
  Google Scholar
• Besner, D., Dennis, I., &Davelaar, E. (1985). Reading without phonology?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 477–492.
  Google Scholar
• Besner, D., &Smith, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 468–482.
  Article Google Scholar
• Borowsky, R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 63–85.
  Article Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.
  Article Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., &Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 240–248.
  Article Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. M. B., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., &Hudson, P. T. W. (1986). Primed-lexical decision: The effect of varying the stimulusonset asynchrony of prime and target.Acta Psychologica,61, 17–36.
  Article Google Scholar
• Evett, L. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33, 325–350.
  Google Scholar
• Fera, P., Jolicoeur, P., &Besner, D. (1994). Evidence against early selection: Stimulus quality effects in previewed displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 259–275.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., &Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked non-word priming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 353–372.
  Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1992, November).Lexical effects in masked formpriming. Paper presented at the thirty-third annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
• Forster, K. I. (1994). Computational modeling and elementary process analysis in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1292–1310.
  Article Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., &Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 211–251.
  Google Scholar
• Grossberg, S., &Stone, G. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Attentional priming, learning, and resonance.Psychological Review,93, 46–74.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hinton, G. E., &Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia.Psychological Review,98, 74–95.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification.Cognitive Psychology,22, 517–560.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Joordens, S., &Besner, D. (1994). When banking on meaning is not yet money in the bank: Explorations in connectionist modeling.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1051–1062.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lesch, M. F., &Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 285–294.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1991). Phonological access of the lexicon: Evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 951–966.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1993). Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 166–178.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 107–128.
  Article Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (1991). A distributed memory model of context effects in word identification. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 233–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 3–23.
  Article Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J., &Borowsky, R. (1995). Unsettling questions about semantic ambiguity in connectionist models: Comment on Joordens and Besner.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 509–514.
  Article Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 3–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
  Article Google Scholar
• Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review,76, 165–178.
  Article Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., &Johansen, L. S. (1994). The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1129–1157.
  Article Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 221–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter word recognition: The word-superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., &Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology.Cognitive Neuropsychology,10, 377–500.
  Article Google Scholar
• Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed.),Semantic information processing (pp. 216–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory.Psychological Review,95, 385–408.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rosson, M. B. (1983). From SOFA to LOUCH: Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation.Memory & Cognition,11, 152–160.
  Google Scholar
• Rueckl, J. G. (1995). Ambiguity and connectionist networks: Still settling into a solution—Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 501–508.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., &The PDP Research Group (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, & Computers,20, 206–217.
  Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. (1990).Mel user’s guide: Computer techniques for real time experimentation. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
  Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., Plaut, D. C., Petersen, A. S., McClelland, J. L., &McRae, K. (1994). Nonword pronunciation and models of word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1177–1196.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sharkey, A. J. C., &Sharkey, N. E. (1992). Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 543–572.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stolz, J. A., &Besner, D. (1996). The role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as non-automatic processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1166–1177.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1248–1268.
  Article Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1991).Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.
  Article Google Scholar
• Van Selst, M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 631–650.
  Google Scholar

Download references