Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults (original) (raw)

References

• Baddeley, A. D. (2002). The psychology of memory. In A. D. Baddeley, M. Kopelman, & B. A. Wilson (Eds.),Handbook of memory disorders (2nd ed., pp. 3–15). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
  Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. C., &Fulton, A. (1991). Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age.Memory & Cognition,19, 229–238.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. C., Leslie, J. E., Tubbs, A., &Fulton, A. (1989). Aging and memory for pictures of faces.Psychology & Aging,4, 276–283.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. C., Strater, L., &Fulton, A. (1991). False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age.Memory & Cognition,19, 177–188.
  Article Google Scholar
• Biederman, I., &Kalocsai, P. (1998). Neural and psychophysical analysis of object and face recognition. In H. Wechsler, J. P. Phillips, V. Bruce, F. Fogelman Soulie, & T. S. Huang (Eds.),Face recognition: From theory to applications (pp. 3–25). Berlin: Springer.
  Google Scholar
• Blonder, L. X., Smith, C. D., Davis, C. E., Kesler-West, M. L., Garrity, T. F., Avison, M. J., &Andersen, A. H. (2004). Regional brain response to faces of humans and dogs.Cognitive Brain Research,20, 384–394.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Boutet, I., Gentes-Hawn, A., &Chaudhuri, A. (2002). The influence of attention on holistic face encoding.Cognition,84, 321–341.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Carey, S., &Diamond, R. (1994). Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?Visual Cognition,1, 253–274.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cerella, J. (1990). Aging and information processing rate. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 201–221). San Diego: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Chaby, L., Jemel, B., George, N., Renault, B., &Fiori, N. (2001). An ERP study of famous face incongruity detection in middle age.Brain & Cognition,45, 357–377.
  Article Google Scholar
• Connor, L. (2001). Memory in old age: Patterns of decline and preservation.Seminars in Speech & Language,22, 117–125.
  Google Scholar
• Costen, N. P., Parker, D. M., &Craw, I. (1996). Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 602–612.
  Article Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., &Jennings, J. M. (1992). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.),The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 51–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Crook, T. H., &Larrabee, G. J. (1992). Changes in facial recognition memory across the adult life span.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,47, 138–141.
  Google Scholar
• de Gelder, B., &Rouw, R. (2000). Structural encoding precludes recognition of face parts in prosopagnosia.Cognitive Neuropsychology,17, 89–102.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Diamond, R., &Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 107–117.
  Article Google Scholar
• Edelman, S. (1995). Representation, similarity, and the chorus of prototypes.Mind & Machines,5, 45–68.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fahlander, K., Wahlin, A., Almkvist, O., &Bäckman, L. (2002). Cognitive functioning in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia: Further evidence for similar patterns of deficits.Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology,24, 734–744.
  Article Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., &Tanaka, J. R. (1995). The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory face-specific perceptual mechanisms.Vision Research,35, 2089–2093.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, [H.] M., &Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is “special” about face perception?Psychological Review,105, 482–498.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Faubert, J. (2002). Visual perception and aging.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,56, 164–176.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., &McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.Journal of Psychiatric Research,12, 189–198.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M. J., &Tanaka, J. (1998). Training “greeble” experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes.Vision Research,38, 2401–2428.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grady, C. L. (2002). Age-related differences in face processing: A meta-analysis of three functional neuroimaging experiments.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,56, 208–220.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Grégoire, J., &Van der Linden, M. (1997). Effects of age on forward and backward digit spans.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,4, 140–149.
  Article Google Scholar
• Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., &Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 223–233.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hole, G. J. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces.Perception,23, 65–74.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Leder, H., &Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 513–536.
  Article Google Scholar
• Leder, H., Candrian, G., Huber, O., &Bruce, V. (2001). Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.Perception,30, 73–83.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, D. C. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurences.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
  Article Google Scholar
• Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., &Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,6, 255–260.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Maylor, E. A. (1990). Recognizing and naming faces: Aging, memory retrieval, and the tip of the tongue state.Journal of Gerontology,45, P215-P226.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Maylor, E. A., &Valentine, T. (1992). Linear and nonlinear effects of aging on categorizing and naming faces.Psychology & Aging,7, 317–323.
  Article Google Scholar
• Moscovitch, M., &Moscovitch, D. A. (2000). Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces.Cognitive Neuropsychology,17, 201–219.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Owsley, C., Sekuler, R., &Boldt, C. (1981). Aging and low-contrast vision: Face perception.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences,21, 362–365.
  Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., Puglisi, J. T., &Smith, A. D. (1986). Memory for pictures: Does an age-related decline exist?Psychology & Aging,1, 11–17.
  Article Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., Royal, D., Dudley, W., &Morrell, R. (1988). Forgetting of pictures over a long retention interval in young and older adults.Psychology & Aging,3, 94–95.
  Article Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., Smith, A. D., Lautenschlager, G., Earles, J. L., Frieske, D., Zwahr, M., &Gaines, C. L. (1996). Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span.Psychology & Aging,11, 621–637.
  Article Google Scholar
• Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., &McCarthy, G. (1996). Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letter-strings, and textures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Journal of Neuroscience,16, 5205–5215.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G. (1995). Face recognition and perceptual coding. In T. Valentine (Ed.),Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition: Explorations in face space (pp. 47–68). New York: Routledge.
  Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996a). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review,103, 403–428.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996b). Where in an ordered sequence of variables do independent age-related effects occur?Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences,51, P166-P178.
  Google Scholar
• Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., &Memon, A. (1999). Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition.Memory & Cognition,27, 538–552.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., &Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 225–245.
  Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Kay, J. B., Grinnell, E., Stansfield, B., &Szechter, L. (1998). Face recognition in young children: When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.Ansual Cognition,5, 479–496.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., &Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 583–592.
  Article Google Scholar
• Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,79, 471–491.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 161–204.
  Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces.Perception,15, 525–535.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. R., Loffler, G., &Wilkinson, F. (2002). Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space.Vision Research,42, 2909–2923.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 141–145.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yokota, M., Miyanaga, K., Yonemura, K., Watanabe, H., Nagashima, K., Naito, K., et al. (2000). Declining of memory functions of normal elderly persons.Psychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences,54, 217–225.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 441–517.
  Article Google Scholar
• Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., &Hay, D. C. (1987). Configural information in face perception.Perception,16, 747–759.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references