Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces (original) (raw)

References

• Bartlett, J. C., Searcy, J., &Abdi, H. (2003). What are the routes to face recognition? In M. A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.),Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processing (pp. 21–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., &Malpass, R. S. (1989). Crossracial identification.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,15, 19–25.
  Article Google Scholar
• Brigham, J. C., Maass, A., Snyder, L. D., &Spaulding, K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,42, 673–681.
  Article Google Scholar
• Byatt, G., &Rhodes, G. (2004). Identification of own-race and otherrace faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 735–741.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cabeza, R., &Kato, T. (2000). Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition.Psychological Science,11, 429–433.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Caldara, R., Thut, G., Servoir, P., Michel, C. M., Bovet, P., &Renault, B. (2003). Face versus non-face object perception and the ‘other-race’ effect: A spatio-temporal event-related potential study.Clinical Neurophysiology,114, 515–528.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1992). Becoming a face expert. In V. Bruce, A. Cowey, A. W. Ellis, & D. I. Perrett (Eds.),Processing the facial image (pp. 95–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
  Google Scholar
• Chiroro, P., &Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 879–894.
  Google Scholar
• Dehon, H., &Brédart, S. (2001). An “other-race” effect in age estimation from faces.Perception,30, 1107–1113.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Diamond, R., &Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 107–117.
  Article Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., &Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 628–634.
  Article Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H., &Tanaka, J. (1998). What is “special” about face perception?Psychological Review,105, 482–498.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Freire, A., Lee, K., &Symons, L. A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence.Perception,29, 159–170.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Furl, N., Phillips, P. J., &O’Toole, A. J. (2002). Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: Computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis.Cognitive Science,26, 797–815.
  Article Google Scholar
• Golby, A. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Chiao, J. Y., &Eberhardt, J. L. (2001). Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces.Nature Neuroscience,4, 845–850.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L. (2003). Do we all look alike to computers?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7, 55–57.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., &Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 223–233.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. G., Rhodes, G., Schwaninger, A. (2006).An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Humphreys, G. W., Hodsoll, J., &Campbell, C. (2005). Attending but not seeing: The “other-race” effect in face and person perception studied through change blindness.Visual Cognition,12, 249–262.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception.Nature Neuroscience,3, 759–763.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Leder, H., &Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 513–536.
  Article Google Scholar
• Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., &Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,6, 255–260.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• McKone, E., &Peh, Y. X. (2006). Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 106–111.
  Article Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., &Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces.Psychology, Public Policy & Law,7, 3–35.
  Article Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Caldara, R., &Rossion, B. (2006). Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces.Visual Cognition,14, 55–73.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., &Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.Perception,31, 553–566.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Murray, J. E., Rhodes, G., &Schuchinsky, M. (2003). When is a face not a face? The effects of misorientation on mechanisms of face perception. In M. A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.)Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processing (pp. 75–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• O’Toole, A., Peterson, J., &Deffenbacher, K. A. (1996). An “otherrace effect” for categorizing faces by sex.Perception,25, 669–676.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. A., &Rhodes, G. (2003).Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Platz, S. J., &Hosch, H. M. (1988). Cross-racial/ethnic eyewitness identification: A field study.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,18, 972–984.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Tan, S., Brake, S., &Taylor, K. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,80, 313–331.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., &Gauthier, I. (2002). How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?Behavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews,1, 62–74.
  Google Scholar
• Sangrigoli, S., &de Schonen, S. (2004). Effect of visual experience on face processing: A developmental study of inversion and nonnative effects.Developmental Science,7, 74–87.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., &Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 225–245.
  Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., &Farah, M. J. (2003). The holistic representation of faces. In M. A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.),Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processing (pp. 53–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M., &Bukach, C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a crosscultural study.Cognition,93, B1-B9.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.Acta Psychologica,61, 259–273.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Walker, P. M., &Tanaka, J. W. (2003). An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces.Perception,32, 1117–1125.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references