Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? (original) (raw)

References

• Abrams, R. A., &Balota, D. A. (1991). Mental chronometry: Beyond reaction time.Psychological Science,2, 153–157.
  Article Google Scholar
• Alameda, J. R., &Cuetos, F. (1995).Diccionario de frecuencia de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano [Dictionary of word frequency in Spanish]. Oviedo: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
  Google Scholar
• Algarabel, S., Sanmartín, J., García, J., &Espert, R. (1986).Normas de asociación libre de 400 sustantivos pertenecientes a BASPAL [Norms of free association for 400 nouns in the BASPAL database]. Informes del Departamento de Psicología Experimental, Universitat de València, Spain.
  Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.
  Article Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1990). Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 231–237.
  Article Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., &Spieler, D. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 32–55.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chiarello, C., Nuding, S., &Pollock, A. (1988). Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: Influence of response selection and response bias.Brain & Language,34, 302–314.
  Article Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. A. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.
  Article Google Scholar
• Davis, C., Castles, A., &Iakovidis, E. (1998). Masked homophone and pseudohomophone priming in children and adults.Language & Cognitive Processes,13, 625–651.
  Article Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decisions: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 253–280.
  Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K., Sullivan, A., & McPherson, C. (1987).Mediated priming in a single-response lexical decision task. Unpublished manuscript.
• Donders, F. C. (1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen [On the speed of psychological processes].Acta Psychologica,30, 412–431. (Original work published 1868)
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. W. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., &Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory effects in lexical decision and categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 696–713.
  Article Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., &Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Formpriming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 498–514.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., &Van Orden, G. C. (1998). Pathway selection’s utility for control of word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1162–1187.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 24–44.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gordon, B. (1985). Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 631–645.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gordon, B., &Caramazza, A. (1982). Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity.Brain & Language,15, 143–160.
  Article Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Carreiras, M., &Perea, M. (2000). A new technique for visual word recognition research: The luminance increment paradigm.Current Psychology Letters,1, 107–116.
  Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., &Seguí, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 189–195.
  Article Google Scholar
• Grice, G. R., &Reed, J. M. (1992). What makes targets redundant?Perception & Psychophysics,51, 437–442.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., &Lupker, S. J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1331–1356.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., &Lupker, S. J. (1998). The effects of word frequency for Japanese Kana and Kanji words in naming and lexical decision: Can the dual-route model save the lexical-selection account?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1431–1453.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., &Lupker, S. J. (2000). The effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 166–183.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., &Plaut, D. C. (2000). Strategic control in word naming: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo naming task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 719–750.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lane, D. M., &Ashby, B. (1987). PsychLib: A library of machine language routines for controlling psychology experiments on the Apple Macintosh computer.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,19, 246–248.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lesch, M. F., &Pollatsek, A. (1998). Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 573–592.
  Article Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. (1986).Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.Psychological Review,86, 287–330.
  Article Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
  Article Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. P., &Altarriba, J. (1988). Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions. Journal of Memory & Language,27, 545–559.
  Article Google Scholar
• Measso, G., &Zaidel, E. (1990). Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision.Neuropsychologia,28, 635–646.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., &Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 43–71.
  Article Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner and G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 221–243). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–81). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Fernández, L., & Carreiras, M. (1998, December). Efectos secuenciales en la tarea de decisión léxica [Sequential effects in the lexical decision task]. Paper presented at the II Conference of the Spanish Experimental Psychology Society, Granada, Spain.
• Perea, M., &Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 767–779.
  Article Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., &Binder, K. (1999). The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1142–1158.
  Article Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., &Well, A. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 785–794.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,85, 59–108.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.Psychological Bulletin,86, 446–461.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Gómez, P., & McKoon, G. (2001).A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., &Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences.Memory & Cognition,26, 1270–1281.
  Article Google Scholar
• Smith, P. L. (2000). Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: A foundational primer.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,44, 408–463.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 744–774.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., Mattes, S., &Miller, J. (1999). Donders’s assumption of pure insertion: An evaluation on the basis of response dynamics.Acta Psychologica,102, 43–75.
  Article Google Scholar
• Westall, R., Perkey, M. N., &Chute, D. L. (1986). Accurate millisecond timing on Apple’s Macintosh using Drexler’s MilliTimer.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,18, 307–311.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yelland, G. (1993, November).Is there a place for phonological processes in reading development? Paper presented at the 9th Australian Language and Speech Conference, Sydney, Australia.

Download references