Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition (original) (raw)

References

• Ackerman, B. P. (1986). Differences in the associative constraint on retrieval search from a context cue for children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,42, 315–344.
  Article Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects in lexical decision: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, & Cognition,18, 234–254.
  Article Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 439–461.
  Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &Gulikers, L. (1995).The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  Google Scholar
• Bjorklund, D. F., &Jacobs, J. W., III (1985). Associative and categorical processes in children’s memory: The role of automaticity in the development of organization in free recall.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,39, 599–617.
  Article Google Scholar
• Borowsky, R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 63–85.
  Article Google Scholar
• Buchanan, L., Brown, N. R., Cabeza, R., &Maitson, C. (1999). False memories and semantic lexicon arrangement.Brain & Language,68, 172–177.
  Article Google Scholar
• Buchanan, L., Burgess, C., &Lund, K. (1998). Overcrowding in semantic neighborhoods: A computational analysis of deep dyslexia.Brain & Cognition,30, 111–114.
  Google Scholar
• Buchanan, L., Kiss, I., &Burgess, C. (2000). Phonological and semantic information in word and nonword reading in a deep dyslexic patient.Brain & Cognition,36, 65–68.
  Google Scholar
• Burgess, C., &Lund, K. (1997). Representing abstract words and emotional connotation in a high-dimensional memory space. In M.G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.),Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 61–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Burgess, C., &Lund, K. (2000). The dynamics of meaning in memory. In E. Dietrich & A. Markman (Eds.),Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines (pp. 117–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., &Van Orden, G. (1998). Pathway selection’s utility for control of word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1162–1187.
  Article Google Scholar
• Glosser, G., Friedman, R. B., Grugan, P. K., Lee, J. H., &Grossman, M. (1998). Lexical semantic priming and associative priming in Alzheimer’s disease.Neuorpsychology,12, 218–224.
  Article Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple readout model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hino, Y., &Lupker, S. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1331–1356.
  Article Google Scholar
• Janczura, G. A., &Nelson, D. L. (1999). Concept accessibility as the determinant of typicality judgements.American Journal of Psychology,11, 1–19.
  Article Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., &Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.Psychological Review,104, 211–240.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lichacz, F. M., Herdman, C. M., Lefevre, J., &Baird, B. (1999). Polysemy effects in word naming.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 189–193.
  Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., &Goldinger, S. D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 122–147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Lund, K., &Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 203–208.
  Google Scholar
• Lund, K., Burgess, C., &Audet, C. (1996). Dissociating semantic and associative word relationships using high dimensional semantic space. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.),Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 603–608). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Madden, D. J. (1992). Four to ten milliseconds per year: Age-related slowing of visual word identification.Journal of Gerontology,47, 59–68.
  Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition.Cognition,25, 71–102.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 3–23.
  Article Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., &Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception.Cognitive Psychology,18, 1–86.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., &Kawamoto, A. H. (1986). Mechanisms of sentence processing: Assigning roles to constituent. In D. E. Rummelhart, J. L. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol.2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 272–325). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. P. (1994). Theories of priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 507–520.
  Article Google Scholar
• McRae, K., &Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 558–572.
  Article Google Scholar
• Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 863–883.
  Article Google Scholar
• MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine Usable Dictionary. Version 2.00 [On-line]. Available http://www.psy.uwa.edu.au/MRCData-Base/mrc2.html.
• Myerson, J., Ferraro, F. R., Hale, S., &Lima, S. D. (1992). General slowing in semantic priming and word recognition.Psychology & Aging,7, 257–270.
  Article Google Scholar
• Myerson, J., Hale, S., Chen, J., &Lawrence, B. (1997). General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: The roles of age and ability.Acta Psychologica,96, 83–101.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., Bennett, D. J., &Leibert, T. W. (1997). One step is not enough: Making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.Memory & Cognition,25, 785–796.
  Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1994).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme and word fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript.
• Nelson, D. L., McKinney, V. M., Gee, N. R., &Janczura, G. A. (1998). Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.Psychological Review,105, 299–324.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ober, B. A., Shenaut, G. K., &Reed, B. R. (1995). Assessment of associative relations in Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for the preservation of semantic memory.Aging & Cognition,2, 254–267.
  Article Google Scholar
• Peereman, R., &Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effects in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 409–421.
  Article Google Scholar
• Pexman, P., &Lupker, S. (1999). Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 323–334.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor network. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.),Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 37–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision.Language & Cognitive Processes,12, 765–805.
  Article Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., &Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology.Cognitive Neuropsychology,10, 377–500.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., &Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 876–900.
  Article Google Scholar
• Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.Psychological Bulletin,96, 316–340.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sommers, M. S., &Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context.Psychology & Aging,14, 458–472.
  Article Google Scholar
• Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1998).Naming latencies for 2820 words [On-line]. Available at http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/\~balota/naming. html.
• Stone, G., Vanhoy, M., &Van Orden, G. (1997). Perception is a twoway street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 337–359.
  Article Google Scholar
• Westbury, C., &Buchanan, L. (1999). What’s in a word? A sublexical effect in a lexical decision task. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.),Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 824). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar

Download references