Absolute memory for musical pitch: Evidence from the production of learned melodies (original) (raw)

References

• Attneave, F., &Olson, R. K. (1971). Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling.American Journal of Psychology,84, 147–166.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Bachem, A. (1954). Time factors in relative and absolute pitch determination.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,26, 751–753.
  Article Google Scholar
• Baggaley, J. (1974). Measurement of absolute pitch.Psychology of Music,2(2), 11–17.
  Article Google Scholar
• Batschelet, E. (1981).Circular statistics for biology. London: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Bharucha, J. J. (1992). Tonality and learnability. In M. R. Jones & S. Holleran (Eds.),Cognitive bases of musical communication (pp. 213–223). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., &Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Bower, G. H. (1967). A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 1, pp. 229–325). New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Campbell, W. C., &Heller, J. (1979). Convergence procedures for investigating music listening tasks.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education,59, 18–23.
  Google Scholar
• Cook, P. R. (1991). Identification of control parameters in an articulator vocal tract model, with applications to the synthesis of singing (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University).Dissertation Abstracts International,52, 419B. (University Microfilms No. 91-15, 756)
  Google Scholar
• Cook, P. R. (1992).Spectro [Freeware]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. (Available by anonymous ftp from ccrma.stanford.edu)
  Google Scholar
• Corliss, E. L. (1973). Remark on “fixed-scale mechanism of absolute pitch.”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,53, 1737–1739.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. (1991).Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown.
  Google Scholar
• Deutsch, D. (1969). Music recognition.Psychological Review,76, 300–307.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Deutsch, D. (1972). Octave generalization and tune recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 411–412.
  Google Scholar
• Deutsch, D. (1978). Octave generalization and melody identification.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 91–92.
  Google Scholar
• Deutsch, D. (1991). The tritone paradox: An influence of language on music perception.Music Perception,8, 335–347.
  Google Scholar
• Deutsch, D. (1992). The tritone paradox: Implications for the representation and communication of pitch structure. In M. R. Jones & S. Holleran (Eds.),Cognitive bases of musical communication (pp. 115–138). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Deutsch, D., Kuyper, W. L., &Fisher, Y. (1987). The tritone paradox: Its presence and form of distribution in a general population.Music Perception,5, 79–92.
  Google Scholar
• Deutsch, D., Moore, F. R., &Dolson, M. (1986). The perceived height of octave-related complexes.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,80, 1346–1353.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Dowling, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies.Psychological Review,85, 341–354.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dowling, W. J. (1982). Melodic information processing and its development. In D. Deutsch (Ed.),The psychology of music (pp. 413–429). New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Dowling, W. J., &Bartlett, J. C. (1981). The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies.Psychomusicology,1, 30–49.
  Google Scholar
• Fisher, N. I. (1993).Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Halpern, A. R. (1988). Mental scanning in auditory imagery for songs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 434–443.
  Article Google Scholar
• Halpern, A. R. (1989). Memory for the absolute pitch of familiar songs.Memory & Cognition,17, 572–581.
  Google Scholar
• Handel, S. (1989).Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Hanson, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Pscyhology,58, 321–334.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hayman, C. A. G., &Tulving, E. (1989). Contingent dissociation between recognition and fragment completion: The method of triangulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 228–240.
  Article Google Scholar
• Idson, W. L., &Massaro, D. W. (1978). A bidimensional model of pitch in the recognition of melodies.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 551–565.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kallman, H. J., &Massaro, D. W. (1979). Tone chroma is functional in melody recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 32–36.
  Google Scholar
• Kohler, W. (1938). Simple structural function in the chimpanzee and the chicken. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.),A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology (pp. 217–227). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original work published 1918)
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Kolb, B., &Whishaw, I. Q. (1990).Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
  Google Scholar
• Krumhansl, C. L. (1990).Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Levitin, D. J. (1994).Limitations of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: The need for circular statistics in psychology. (Tech. Rep. No 94-7). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, Institute of Cognitive & Decision Sciences.
  Google Scholar
• Lockhead, G. R., &Byrd, R. (1981). Practically perfect pitch.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,70, 387–389.
  Article Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1968).The mind of a mnemonist. New York: Basic Books.
  Google Scholar
• Massaro, D. W. (1972). Perceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.Psychological Review,79, 124–145.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, K. (1988). Musical pitch identification by absolute pitch possessors.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 501–512.
  Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, K. (1990). The speed of musical pitch identification by absolute pitch possessors.Music Perception,8, 177–188.
  Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, K. (1993). Absolute pitch as an inability: Identification of musical intervals in a tonal context.Music Perception,11, 55–72.
  Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J. (1989).An introduction to the psychology of hearing (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Murry, T. (1990). Pitch-matching accuracy in singers and nonsingers.Journal of Voice,4, 317–321.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.Psychological Bulletin,95, 109–133.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. R. (1983).The science of musical sound. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  Google Scholar
• Profita, J., &Bidder, T. G. (1988). Perfect pitch.American Journal of Medical Genetics,29, 763–771.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rakowski, A., &Morawska-Büngeler, M. (1987). In search of the criteria for absolute pitch.Archives of Acoustics,12, 75–87.
  Google Scholar
• Reese, H. W. (1968).The perception of stimulus relations. New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N. (1964). Circularity in judgments of relative pitch.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,36, 2346–2353.
  Article Google Scholar
• Shonle, J. I., &Horan, K. E. (1980). The pitch of vibrato tones.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,67, 246–252.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Spence, K. W. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension.Psychological Review,44, 430–444.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stern, A. W. (1993).Natural pitch and the A440 scale. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics, Stanford, CA.
  Google Scholar
• Stromeyer, C. F., III (1970, November). Eidetikers.Psychology Today, pp. 76–80.
• Sundberg, J. (1987).The science of the singing voice. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, A. H., &Hulse, S. H. (1993). Absolute pitch.Psychological Bulletin,113, 345–361.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Terhardt, E., &Seewan, M. (1983). Aural key identification and its relationship to absolute pitch.Music Perception,1, 63–83.
  Google Scholar
• Terhardt, E., &Ward, W. D. (1982). Recognition of musical key: Exploratory study.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,72, 26–33.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tsuzaki, M. (1992, February).Interference of preceding scales on absolute pitch judgment. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Los Angeles.
• Ward, W. D. (1990, May).Relative versus absolute pitch and the key of auralized melodies. Paper presented at the von Karajan Symposium, Vienna.
• Ward, W. D., &Burns, E. M. (1978). Singing without auditory feedback.Journal of Research in Singing & Applied Vocal Pedagogy,1, 24–44.
  Google Scholar
• Ward, W. D., &Burns, E. M. (1982). Absolute pitch. In D. Deutsch (Ed.),The psychology of music (pp. 431–451). New York: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Zatorre, R. J., &Beckett, C. (1989). Multiple coding strategies in the retention of musical tones by possessors of absolute pitch.Memory & Cognition,17, 582–589.
  Google Scholar

Download references