Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward (original) (raw)

References

• Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological Bulletin,82, 463–496.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ainslie, G. (1992).Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., &Yagil, J. (1989). Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study.Management Science,35, 270–284.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chung, S.-H., &Herrnstein, R. J. (1967). Choice and delay of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,10, 67–74.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gallant, A. R. (1987).Nonlinear statistical models. New York: Wiley.
  Book Google Scholar
• Green, L. (1982). Self-control behavior in animals. In V. L. Smith (Ed.),Research in experimental economics (Vol. 2, pp. 129–150). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  Google Scholar
• Green, L., Fry, A. F., &Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison.Psychological Science,5, 33–36.
  Article Google Scholar
• Green, L., &Myerson, J. (1993). Alternative frameworks for the analysis of self control.Behavior & Philosophy,21, 37–47.
  Google Scholar
• Green, L., &Myerson, J. (1996). Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time.American Zoologist,36, 496–505.
  Google Scholar
• Kirby, K. N., &Marakovic, N. N. (1995). Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,64, 22–30.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kirby, K. N., &Marakovic, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 100–104.
  Google Scholar
• Koopmans, T. C. (1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience.Econometrica,28, 287–309.
  Article Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1992). The fall and rise of psychological explanations in the economics of intertemporal choice. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.),Choice over time (pp. 3–34). New York: Russell Sage.
  Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., &Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation.Quarterly Journal of Economics,107, 573–597.
  Article Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., &Thaler, R. H. (1989). Anomalies: Intertemporal choice.Journal of Economic Perspectives,3, 181–193.
  Google Scholar
• Logue, A. W. (1988). Research on self-control: An integrating framework.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,11, 665–679.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Myerson, J., &Green, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,64, 263–276.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rachlin, H. (1974). Self-control.Behaviorism,2, 94–107.
  Google Scholar
• Rachlin, H., &Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and selfcontrol.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,17, 15–22.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rachlin, H., Logue, A. W., Gibbon, J., &Frankel, M. (1986). Cognition and behavior in studies of choice.Psychological Review,93, 33–45.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., &Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,55, 233–244.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Raineri, A., &Rachlin, H. (1993). The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,6, 77–94.
  Article Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility.Review of Economic Studies,4, 155–161.
  Article Google Scholar
• Strotz, R. H. (1956). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization.Review of Economic Studies,23, 165–180.
  Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency.Economics Letters,8, 201–207.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references