Richer color experience in observers with multiple photopigment opsin genes (original) (raw)

References

• Almirall, H., &Gutierrez, E. (1987). Auditory and visual reaction time in adults during long performance.Perceptual & Motor Skills,65, 543–552.
  Google Scholar
• Anyan, W.R., Jr., &Quillian, W. W., II (1971). The naming of primary colors by children.Child Development,42, 1629–1632.
  Article Google Scholar
• Asenjo, A. B., Rim, J., &Oprian, D. D. (1994). Molecular determinants of human red /green color discrimination.Neuron,12, 1131–1138.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Blough, P. M., &Slavin, L. K. (1987). Reaction time assessments of gender differences in visual-spatial performance.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 276–281.
  Google Scholar
• Boker, S. (1997). A measurement of the adaptation of color vision to the spectral environment.Psychological Science,8, 130–143.
  Article Google Scholar
• Boring, E. G. (1942).Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  Google Scholar
• Boynton, R. M., Schafer, W. & Neun, M. E. (1964). Hue-wavelength relation measured by color-naming method for three retinal locations.Science,146, 666–668.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Brabyn, L. B., &McGuinness, D. (1979). Gender differences in response to spatial frequency and stimulus orientation.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 319–324.
  Google Scholar
• Brindley, G. S. (1960).Physiology of the retina and the visual pathway. London: Edward Arnold.
  Google Scholar
• Buckalew, L. W., &Buckalew, N. M. (1989). Note on color preference and color vision test performance.Perception & Motor Skills,69, 1039–1042.
  Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. W. (1986). In search of the spectrum’s elusive yellow.Ophthalmic Physiological Optics,6, 129–133.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cohn, S. A., Emmerich, D. S., &Carlson, E. A. (1989). Differences in the responses of heterozygous carriers of color blindness and normal controls to briefly presented stimuli.Vision Research,29, 255–262.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Crone, R. A. (1959). Spectral sensitivity in color-defective subjects and heterozygous carriers.American Journal of Ophthalmology,48, 231–238.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Dartnall, H. J. A., Bowmaker, J. K., &Mollon, J. D. (1983). Human visual pigments: Microspectrophotometric results from the eyes of seven persons.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,220, 115–13.
  Article Google Scholar
• Deeb, S. S., &Motulsky, A. G. (1996). Molecular genetics of human color vision.Behavioral Genetics,26, 195–206.
  Article Google Scholar
• DeMarco, P., Pokorny, J., &Smith, V. C. (1992). Full spectrum cone sensitivity functions for X-chromosome-linked anomalous trichromats.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,9, 1465–1476.
  Article Google Scholar
• DeVries, H. L. (1948). The luminosity curve of the eye as determined by the measurements with the flickerphotometer.Physica,XIV, 367–380.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dimmick, F. L., &Hubbard, M. R. (1939). The spectral location of psychologically unique yellow, green and blue.American Journal of Psychology,52, 242–251.
  Article Google Scholar
• Feig, K., &Ropers, H. (1978). On the incidence of unilateral and bilateral colour blindness in heterozygous females.Journal of Human Genetics,41, 313–323.
  Article Google Scholar
• Furbee, L. N., Maynard, K., Smith, J., Benfer, B. A., Jr.,Quick, S., &Ross, L. (1997). The emergence of color cognition from color perception.Journal of Linguistic Anthropology,6, 223–240.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hardin, C. L., &Maffi, L. (Eds.) (1997).Color categories in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Book Google Scholar
• He, J. C., &Shevell, S. K. (1995). Variation in color matching and discrimination among deuteranomalous trichromats: Theoretical implications of small differences in photopigments.Vision Research,35, 2579–2588.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hecht, S., &Shlaer, S. (1936). The color vision of dichromats.Journal of General Physiology,20, 57–93.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hsia, Y. &Graham, C. H. (1957). Spectral luminosity curves for protanopic, deuteranopic and normal subjects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,43, 1011–1019.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. H. (1998). Photopigments and seeing—Lessons from natural experiments.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,39, 2205–2216.
  Google Scholar
• Jameson, D., &Hurvich, L. M. (1956). Theoretical analysis of anomalous trichromatic color vision.Journal of the Optical Society of America,46, 1075–1089.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Jordan, G., &Mollon, J. D. (1993). A study of women heterozygous for color deficiencies.Vision Research,33, 1495–1508.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Judd, D. B. (1945). Standard response functions for protanopic and deuteranopic vision.Journal of the Optical Society of America,35, 199–221.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kraft, T. W., Neitz, J., &Neitz, M. (1998). Spectra of human cones.Vision Research,38, 3663–3670.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Krill, A. E., &Beutler, E. (1964). The red-light absolute threshold in heterozygote protan carriers.Investigative Ophthalmology,3, 107–118.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Krill, A. E., &Beutler, E. (1965). Red light thresholds in heterozygote carriers of protanopia: Genetic implications.Science,149, 186–188.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. T. (1975).Language and woman’s place. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
  Google Scholar
• Lyon, M. F. (1961). Gene action in the X chromosome of the mouse_(Mus musculus L.)_.Nature,190, 372–373.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• MacLeod, D. I. A. (1985). Receptoral constraints on colour appearance. In D. Ottoson & S. Zeki (Eds.),Central and peripheral mechanisms of colour vision (pp. 103–116). London: Macmillian.
  Google Scholar
• MacLeod, D. I. A., & von der Twer, T. (2000).The pleistochrome: Optimal opponent codes for natural colors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Maloney, L. T. (1992). Color constancy and color perception: The linear models framework. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 59–78). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Mausfeld, R. (1998). Color perception: From Grassman codes to a dual code for object and illumination colors. In W. G. K. Backhaus, R. Kliegl, & J. S. Werner (Eds.),Color vision: Perspectives from different disciplines (pp. 219–250). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  Google Scholar
• Mausfeld, R., &Niederée, R. (1993). Inquiries into relational concepts of colour based on an incremental principle of colour coding for minimal relational stimuli.Perception,22, 427–462.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• McGuinness, D. (1976). Away from a unisex psychology: Individual differences in visual sensory and perceptual processes.Perception,5, 279–294.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• McGuinness, D., &Lewis, I. (1976). Sex differences in visual persistence: Experiments on the Ganzfeld and afterimages.Perception,5, 295–301.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Menzel, R. (1985). Colour pathways and colour vision in the honeybee. In D. Ottoson & S. Zeki (Eds.),Central and peripheral mechanisms of colour vision (Proceedings of an International Symposium at the Wenner-Gren Center, Vol. 43, pp. 211–233). London: Macmillan.
  Google Scholar
• Merbs, S. L., &Nathans, J. (1992a). Absorption spectra of human cone pigments.Nature,356, 433–435.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Merbs, S. L., &Nathans, J. (1992b). Absorption spectra of hybrid pigments responsible for anomalous color vision.Science,258, 464–466.
  Article Google Scholar
• Merbs, S. L., &Nathans, J. (1993). Role of hydroxyl-bearing amino acids in differentially tuning the absorption spectra of the human red and green cone pigments.Photochemical Photobiology,58, 706–710.
  Article Google Scholar
• Miller, S. A., Dykes, D. D., &Polesky, H. F. (1998). A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells.Nucleic Acids Research,16, 1215.
  Article Google Scholar
• Miyahara, E., Pokorny, J., Smith, V. C., Baron, R., &Baron, E. (1998). Color vision in two observers with highly biased LWS/MWS cone ratios.Vision Research,38, 601–612.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Mollon, J. D. (1992). Worlds of difference.Nature,356, 378–379.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Mollon, J. D. (1995). Seeing colour. In T. Lamb & J. Bourriau (Eds.),Colour, art & science (pp. 127–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Nagy, A. L., MacLeod, D. I. A., Heyneman, N. E., &Eiser, A. (1981). Four cone pigments in women heterozygous for color deficiency.Journal of the Optical Society of America,71, 719–722.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nathans, J. (1997). The genes for color vision. In A. Byrne & D. R. Hilbert (Eds.),Readings on Color, Vol. 2: The science of color (pp. 249–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Nathans, J., Piantanida, T. P., Eddy, R. L., Shows, T. B., &Hogness, D. S. (1986). Molecular genetics of inherited variation in human color vision.Science,232, 203–210.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nathans, J., Thomas, D., &Hogness, D. S. (1986). Molecular genetics of human color vision: The genes encoding blue, green, and red pigments.Science,232, 193–202.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Neitz, J., &Jacobs, G. H. (1986). Polymorphism of the long-wavelength cone in normal human color vision.Nature,323, 623–625.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Neitz, J., &Neitz, M. (1994). Colour vision defects. In A. S. Wright & B. Jay (Eds.),Molecular genetics of inherited eye disorders (pp. 217–257). Chur: Harwood.
  Google Scholar
• Neitz, J., Neitz, M., &Jacobs, G. H. (1993). More than three different cone pigments among people with normal color vision.Vision Research,33, 117–122.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Neitz, M., Kraft, T. W., &Neitz, J. (1998). Expression of L-cone pigment gene subtypes in females.Vision Research,38, 3221–3225.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Neitz, M., &Neitz, J. (1998). Molecular genetics and the biological basis of color vision. In W. G. K. Backhaus, R. Kliegl, & J. S. Werner (Eds.),Color Vision: Perspectives from different disciplines (pp. 101–119). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  Google Scholar
• Neitz, M., Neitz, J., &Jacobs, G. H. (1995). Genetic basis of photopigment variations in human dichromats.Vision Research,35, 2095–2130.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nerger, J. L. (1988).The relative numbers of long-wavelength-sensitive to middle-wavelength-sensitive cones in the human fovea and parafovea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla.
  Google Scholar
• Nowaczyk, R. H. (1982). Sex-related differences in the color lexicon.Language & Speech,25, 257–265.
  Google Scholar
• Piantanida, T. P. (1976). Polymorphism of human color vision.American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics,53, 647–657.
  Google Scholar
• Pickford, R. W. (1959). Some heterozygous manifestations of colourblindness.British Journal of Physiological Optics,16, 83–95.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Pokorny, J., &Smith, V. C. (1977). Evaluation of a single pigment shift model of anomalous trichromacy.Journal of the Optical Society of America,67, 1196–1209.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pokorny, J., &Smith, V. C. (1982). New observations concerning redgreen colour defects.Colour Research & Application,7, 159–164.
  Article Google Scholar
• Poynter, D. (1988). Variability in brightness matching of colored lights.Human Factors,30, 143–151.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Purdy, D. (1931). Spectral hue as a function of intensity.American Journal of Psychology,43, 541–559.
  Article Google Scholar
• Regan, B. C., Reffin, J. P., &Mollon, J. D. (1994). Luminance noise and the rapid determination of discrimination ellipses in colour deficiency.Vision Research,34, 1279–1299.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rich, E. (1977). Sex-related difference in color vocabulary.Language & Speech,20, 404–409.
  Google Scholar
• Roorda, A., &Williams, D. R. (1999). The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye.Nature,397, 520–522.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Saito, M. (1994). A cross-cultural study on color preference in three Asian cities: Comparison between Tokyo, Taipei and Tianjin.Japanese Psychological Research,36, 219–232.
  Google Scholar
• Saito, M. (1996). A comparative study of color preferences in Japan, China and Indonesia with emphasis on the preference for white.Perceptual & Motor Skills,83, 115–128.
  Google Scholar
• Saito, M. (1999). Blue and seven phenomena among Japanese students.Perceptual & Motor Skills,89, 532–536.
  Article Google Scholar
• Schmidt, I. (1955). A sign of manifest heterozygosity in carriers of color deficiency.American Journal of Optometry,32, 404–408.
  Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. E. (1984).The optical papers of Isaac Newton: Vol. 1. The optical lectures 1670–1672 (pp. 539–554). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Sharpe, L. T., Stockman, A., Jaegle, H., Knau, H., Klausen, G., Reitner, A, &Nathans, J. (1998). Red, green and red-green hybrid pigments in the human retina: Correlations between deduced protein sequences and psychophysically measured spectral sensitivities.Journal of Neuroscience,18, 10053–10069.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Sharpe, L. T., Stockman, A., Knau, H., &Jaegle, H. (1998). Macular pigment densities derived from central and peripheral spectral sensitivity differences.Vision Research,38, 3233–3239.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, S. A., Neitz, M., Balding, S. D., &Neitz, J. (1998). L-cone pigment genes expressed in normal colour vision.Vision Research,38, 3213–3219.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Smeulders, N., Campbell, F. W., &Andrews, P. R. (1994). The role of delineation and spatial frequency in the perception of the colors of the spectrum.Vision Research,34, 927–936.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stockman, A., &Sharpe, L. T. (1998). Human cone spectral sensitivities: A progress report.Vision Research,38, 3193–3206.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stoerig, P. (1998). Wavelength information processing versus color perception: Evidence from blindsight and color-blind sight. In W. G. K. Backhaus, R. Kliegl, & J. S. Werner (Eds.),Color vision: Perspectives from different disciplines (pp. 131–147). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  Google Scholar
• Swaringen, S., Layman, S., &Wilson, A. (1978). Sex differences in color naming.Perceptual & Motor Skills,47, 440–442.
  Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. L., Curtis, A. J., &Bolton, R. (1978). Sex differences in elicited color lexicon size.Perceptual & Motor Skills,47, 77–78.
  Google Scholar
• Thomson, L. C. (1954). Sensations aroused by monochromatic stimuli and their prediction.Optical Acta,1, 93–102.
  Google Scholar
• Troscianko, T., Davidoff, J., Humphreys, G., Landis, T., Fahle, M., Greenlee, M., Brugger, P., &Phillips, W. (1996). Human colour discrimination based on a non-parvocellular pathway.Current Biology,6, 200–210.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wilder, D. G. (1970).The photopic spectral sensitivity of color normal, protanopic and deuteronopic observers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  Google Scholar
• Winderickx, J., Battisti, L., Hibiya, Y., Motulsky, A. G., &Deeb, S. S. (1993). Haplotype diversity in the human red and green opsin genes: Evidence for frequent sequence exchange in exon 3.Human Molecular Genetics Polymorphism,2, 1413–1421.
  Article Google Scholar
• Winderickx, J., Lindsey, D. T., Sanocki, E., Teller, D. Y., Motulsky, A.G., &Deeb, S. S. (1992). Polymorphism in red photopigment underlies variation in color matching.Nature,356, 431–433.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wyszecki, G., &Stiles, W. S. (1982).Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Yasuma, T., Tokuda, H., &Ichikawa, H. (1984). Abnormalities of cone photopigments in genetic carriers of protanomaly.Archives of Ophthalmology,102, 897–900.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Zegura, S. L. (1997). Genes, opsins, neurons, and color categories: Closing the gaps. In C. L. Hardin & L. Maffi (Eds.),Color categories in thought and language (pp. 283–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Chapter Google Scholar

Download references