Extending SEE for large-scale phenotyping of mouse open-field behavior (original) (raw)

References

• Attwood, T. K. (2000). The role of pattern databases in sequence analysis.Brief Bioinformatics,1, 45–59.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., Drai, D., Elmer, G. I., Golani, I., &Kafkafi, N. (2001). Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research.Behavioural Brain Research,125, 279–284.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Cools, A. R., Ellenbroek, B. A., Gingras, M. A., Engbersen, A., &Heeren, D. (1997). Differences in vulnerability and susceptibility to dexamphetamine in Nijmegen high and low responders to novelty: A dose-effect analysis of spatio-temporal programming of behavior.Psychopharmacology,132, 181–187.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D., &Dudek, B. C. (1999). Genetics of mouse behavior: Interactions with lab environment.Science,284, 1670–1672.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Crawley, J. N. (2000).What’s wrong with my mouse? Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Crawley, J. N., Belknap, J. K., Collins, A., Crabbe, J. C., Frankel, W., Henderson, N., Hitzemann, R. J., Maxson, S. C., Miner, L. L., Silva, A. J., Wehner, J. M., Wynshaw-Boris, A., &Pavlov, R. (1997). Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: Implications and recommendations for molecular studies.Psychopharmacology,132, 107–124.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Drai, D., Benjamini, Y., &Golani, I. (2000). Statistical discrimination of natural modes of motion in rat exploratory behavior.Journal of Neuroscience Methods,96, 119–131.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Drai, D., &Golani, I. (2001). SEE: A tool for the visualization and analysis of rodent exploratory behavior.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,25, 409–426.
  Article Google Scholar
• Drai, D., Kafkafi, N., Benjamini, Y., Elmer, G., &Golani, I. (2001). Rats and mice share common ethologically relevant parameters of exploratory behavior.Behavioural Brain Research,125, 133–140.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Eilam, D., &Golani, I. (1989). Home base behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus) exploring a novel environment.Behavioral Brain Research,34, 199–211.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gingras, M. A., &Cools, A. R. (1997). Different behavioral effects of daily or intermittent dexamphetamine administration in Nijmegen high and low responders.Psychopharmacology,132, 188–194.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Golani, I., Benjamini, Y., &Eilam, D. (1993). Stopping behavior: Constraints on exploration in rats (Rattus norvegicus).Behavioural Brain Research,53, 21–33.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kafkafi, N., Lipkind, D., Benjamini, Y., Mayo, C. L., Elmer, I. G., & Golani, I. (in press). SEE locomotor behavior test discriminates C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse inbred strains across laboratories and protocol conditions.Behavioral Neuroscience.
• Kafkafi, N., Mayo, C. L., Drai, D., Golani, D., &Elmer, G. I. (2001). Natural segmentation of the locomotor behavior of drug-induced rats in a photobeamcage.Journal of Neuroscience Methods,109, 111–121.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kafkafi, N., Pagis, M., Lipkind D., Mayo, C. L., Benjamini, Y., Golani, I., & Elmer, I. G. (in press). Darting behavior: A quantitative movement pattern designed for discrimination and replicability in mouse locomotor behavior.Behavioural Brain Research.
• Pitt, W. R., Williams, M. A., Steven, M., Sweeney, B., Bleasby, A. J., &Moss, D. S. (2001). The Bioinformatics Template Library: Generic components for biocomputing.Bioinformatics,17, 729–737.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. C., Jones, D. N., Nelson, P. R., Jones, C. M., Quilter, C. A., Robinson, T. L., &Hagan, J. J. (1999). Use of SHIRPA and discriminant analysis to characterise marked differences in the behavioural phenotype of six inbred mouse strains.Behavioural Brain Research,105, 207–217.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tarantino, L. M., Gould, T. J., Druhan, J. P., &Bucan, M. (2000). Behavior and mutagenesis screens: The importance of baseline analysis of inbred strains.Mammalian Genome,11, 555–564.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tchernichovski, O., Benjamini, Y., &Golani, I. (1996). Constraints and the emergence of freedom in the ontogeny of rat exploratory behavior.Behaviour,133, 519–539.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tchernichovski, O., Benjamini, Y., &Golani, I. (1998). The dynamics of long term exploratory behavior in the rat: Pt. I.Biological Cybernetics,78, 423–432.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tchernichovski, O., &Golani, I. (1995). A phase plane representation of rat exploratory behavior.Journal of Neuroscience Methods,62, 21–27.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wahlsten, D. (2001). Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: Reasons, recommendations, and reality.Physiology & Behavior,73, 695–704.
  Article Google Scholar
• Whishaw, I. Q., Cassel, J. C., Majchrzak, M., Cassel, S., &Will, B. (1994). “Short-stops” in rats with fimbria-fornix lesions: Evidence for change in the mobility gradient.Hippocampus,4, 577–582.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Whishaw, I. Q., Hines, D. J., &Wallace, D. G. (2001). Dead reckoning (path integration) requires the hippocampal formation: Evidence from spontaneous exploration and spatial learning tasks in light (allothetic) and dark (idiothetic) tests.Behavioural Brain Research,127, 49–69.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wolfram, S. (1999).The Mathematica book (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.
  Google Scholar

Download references