Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations (original) (raw)

Reference Notes

1. Jonides, J.Voluntary versus reflexive control of the mind’s eye’s movement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, November 1976.
2. Posner, M. W., Davidson, B. J., & Nissen, M. J.Theprocess of stimulus detection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, November 1976.
3. Dorfman, D. D.Standard errors and confidence intervals for measures of sensitivity. Paper presented at the meetings of the Acoustical Society of America, Miami Beach, Florida, December 1977.
4. Posner, M. W., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. C.Attending to a position in space. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Denver, November 1975.

References

• Beck, J., &Ambler, B. Discriminability differences in line slope and in line arrangement as a function of mask delay.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 33–38.
  Google Scholar
• Blaha, J. Visual information processing: Location uncertainty effects on target detection (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1971).Dissertation Abstracts International,32B, 3022. (University Microfilms No. 71–27, 432)
• Broaobent, D. Stimulus set and response set: Two kinds of selective attention. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.),Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis. New York: Meredith, 1970.
  Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D., &Gregory, M. Division of attention and the decision theory of signal detection.Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1963,158, 222–231.
  Article Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D., &Gregory, M. Stimulus set and response set: The alternation of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,16, 309–318.
  Article Google Scholar
• Carr, T. H., &Bacharach, V. R. Perceptual tuning and conscious attention: Systems of input regulation in visual information processing.Cognition, 1976,4, 281–302.
  Article Google Scholar
• Colegate, R. L., Hoffman, J. E., &Eriksen, C. W. Selective encoding from multielement visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 217–224.
  Google Scholar
• Doreman, D. D., &Ale, E., Jr. Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—rating-method data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1969,6, 487–496.
  Article Google Scholar
• Engel.F. L. Visual conspicuity, directed attention and retinal locus.Vision Research, 1971,11, 563–575.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception as determined by vocal reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 169–171. (a)
  Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. Iemporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 201–204. (b)
  Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 155–160.
  Article Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W.. &Hoffman, J. E. Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,4, 587–589.
  Google Scholar
• Ferguson, G. A.Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
  Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, V., &Galanter, E. A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 25–33.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Krieger, 1974.
  Google Scholar
• Grindley, G. C., &Townsend, V. Voluntary attention in peripheral vision and its effects on acuity and differential thresholds.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,20, 11–19.
  Article Google Scholar
• Helmholtz, H. V.[Physiological optics] (Vol. 3; J. P. C. Southall, trans.). New York: Dover, 1962. (Originally published, 1909.)
  Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
  Google Scholar
• Kaufman, L., &Richards, W. Spontaneous fixation tendencies for visual forms.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,5, 88–98.
  Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W.Attention and human performance. Pacific Palisades, Calif: Scott, Foresman, 1973.
  Google Scholar
• Keren, S. W., &Skelton, J. On selecting between theories of selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,20, 85–88.
  Article Google Scholar
• Klein, R. Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? In R. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.
  Google Scholar
• Mertens, J. J. Influence of knowledge of target location upon the probability of observation of peripherally observable test flashes.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1956,46, 1069–1070.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Mowrer, O. H. Preparatory set (expectancy): Further evidence for its “central” locus.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1941,28, 116–118.
  Article Google Scholar
• Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Meredith, 1967.
  Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., &Boies, S. J. Components of attention.Psychological Review, 1971,78, 391–408.
  Article Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., &Klein, R. M. On the functions of consciousness. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
  Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick, Jr., & E. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
  Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975. (a)
  Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  Google Scholar
• Remington, R. W.Visual attention, detection and the control of saccadic eye movements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1978.
• Shaw, M. L., &Shaw, P. Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: ttuman Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 201–211.
  Article Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M. The locus and role of attention in memory systems. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., &Gardner, G. Visual processing capacity and attentional control.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,93, 72–83.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., &Grantham, D. W. Can attention be allocated to sensory modalities?Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 460–474.
  Article Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., McKay, D. P., &Shaffer, W. O. Attending to 49 spatial positions at once.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,6, 190–215.
  Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. J., &Fitter, M. J. What is the best index of detectability?Psychological Review, 1973,80, 481–488.
  Google Scholar
• Starr, S. J., Metz, C. E., Lusted, L. B., &Goodenough, D. J. Visual detection and localization of radiographic images.Radiology, 1975,116, 533–538.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Swets.J. A., Pickett, R. M., Whitehead, S. F., Getty D.J., Schnur, J. A., Swets, J. B., &Freeman, B. A. Assessment of diagnostic technologies.Science, 1979,205, 753–759.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Van Der Heijden, A. H. C., &Eerland, E. The effects of cueing in a visual signal detection task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,25, 496–503.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, S., &Hillyard, S. A. Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22, 54–62.
  Google Scholar

Download references