Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory (original) (raw)

References

• Blasko, D. G., &Connine, C. M. (1993). Effect of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 295–308.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cacciari, C., &Glucksberg, S. (1994). Understanding figurative language. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 447–478). San Diego: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., &Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis.Discourse Processes,25, 285–307.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A., &Keysar, B. (1995, November).The role of suppression in metaphor interpretation. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994a). Figurative thought and figurative language. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 411–446). San Diego: Academic Press.
  Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (1994b).The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S. (1998). Understanding metaphors.Current Directions in Psychological Science,7, 39–43.
  Article Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., &Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding non-literal speech: Can people ignore metaphors?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 85–98.
  Article Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., &Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity.Psychological Review,97, 3–18.
  Article Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., &Manfredini, D. A. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 50–67.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kintsch, E.,Steinhart, D., & the LSA Research Group (in press). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback.Interactive Learning Environments.
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998).Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (in press). Predication.Cognitive Science.
• Laham, D. (1997). Latent semantic analysis approaches to categorization. In M. G. Shafto & M. K. Johnson (Eds.),Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 979). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Laham, D.,Bennett, W., Jr., &Landauer, T. K. (in press). An LSAbased software tool for matching jobs, people, and instruction.Interactive Learning Environments.
• Landauer, T. K., &Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.Psychological Review,104, 211–240.
  Article Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P., &Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis.Discourse Processes,25, 259–284.
  Article Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., Rehder, B., &Schreiner, M. E. (1997). How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of latent semantic analysis and humans. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.),Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412–417). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Ortony, A. (1979). Beyond literal similarity.Psychological Review,86, 161–180.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B., Schreiner, M. E., Rehder, R., Laham, D., Foltz, P.W., Landauer, T. K., &Kintsch, W. (1998). Learning from text: Matching reader and text by latent semantic analysis.Discourse Processes,25, 309–336.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references