Soil CO2 efflux from mountainous windthrow areas: dynamics over 12 years post-disturbance (original) (raw)

Research article

|

11 Nov 2014

Research article | | 11 Nov 2014

Abstract. Windthrow-driven changes in carbon (C) allocation and soil microclimate can affect soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux (_F_soil) from forest ecosystems. Although _F_soil is the dominant C flux following stand-replacing disturbance, the effects of catastrophic windthrow on _F_soil are still poorly understood. We measured _F_soil at a montane mixed-forest site and at a subalpine spruce forest site from 2009 until 2012. Each site consisted of an undisturbed forest stand and two adjacent partially cleared (stem-fraction-harvested) windthrow areas, which differed with regard to the time since disturbance. The combination of chronosequence and direct time-series approaches enabled us to investigate _F_soil dynamics over 12 years post-disturbance. At both sites _F_soil rates did not differ significantly from those of the undisturbed stands in the initial phase after disturbance (1–6 years). In the later phase after disturbance (9–12 years), _F_soil rates were significantly higher than in the corresponding undisturbed stand. Soil temperature increased significantly following windthrow (by 2.9–4.8 °C), especially in the initial phase post-disturbance when vegetation cover was sparse. A significant part (15–31%) of _F_soil from the windthrow areas was attributed to the increase in soil temperature. According to our estimates, ~500–700 g C m−2 year−1 are released via _F_soil from south-facing forest sites in the Austrian Calcareous Alps in the initial 6 years after windthrow. With a high browsing pressure suppressing tree regeneration, post-disturbance net loss of ecosystem C to the atmosphere is likely to be substantial unless forest management is proactive in regenerating such sites. An increase in the frequency of forest disturbance by windthrow could therefore decrease soil C stocks and feed back positively on rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

Received: 27 Mar 2014

–

Discussion started: 06 May 2014

–

Revised: 05 Sep 2014

–

Accepted: 29 Sep 2014

–

Published: 11 Nov 2014