CSS Display Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-10-15 WD (original) (raw)
Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20151015/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: table-caption & table-cell should use flow-root not flow From: Oriol Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0372.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0064.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
Issue 2. #
Summary: Define
and
Issue 3. # Summary: Shouldn't root be in-flow? From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0332.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
Issue 5. # Summary: Interaction of run-in and ::first-letter From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0330.html ∈ Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650#issuecomment-274908554 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
Issue 6. # Summary: Inconsistent implementation of 'display: flex' on
From: glanbin Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-232788709 Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editor discretionIssue 7. # Summary: Consider removing 'display: run-in' From: Ms2ger Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339#issuecomment-234783783 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 8. # Summary: Define interaction of 'display: contents' and replaced elements From: Simon Pieters Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540#issuecomment-285214950 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sQbKYcM6mmRueGJBozPGer_UwQDMyv+eww3kOBAHC7mg@mail.gmail.com ⎆
Issue 9. # Summary: Display value visible to AT From: Dave Cramer, Sara Soueidan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-270094051 Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 10. # Summary: Effect of 'display: contents' on counter scoping From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/674 Response: Closed: Accepted Note: Still needs edits in css-lists-3. Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
Issue 11. # Summary: Why is introduction normative? Also defining “element”? From: Anne van Kesteren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680#issuecomment-270103941 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 12. # Summary: 'display: contents' on root element From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805#issuecomment-266991346 Closed: Invalid
Issue 13. # Summary: “run-in box with 'display: flow'” nonsensical From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832#issuecomment-270106512 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 14. # Summary: "flow-root" harmful From: Binyammin Laukstein Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275141140 Closed: Invalid Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275208753
Issue 15. # Summary: Rename flow-root From: Simon Fraser Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964#issuecomment-274638719 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com ⎆
Issue 16. # Summary: Tooltips are wrong From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834#issuecomment-280431244 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 17. # Summary: HTML shouldn't be a normative reference From: Bert Bos Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011#issuecomment-286501361 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 18. # Summary: What are form controls? From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-285215276 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 19. #
Summary: Anonymous boxes inheriting from display: contents
From: Oriol, Boris Zbarsky
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1249
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301942276
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301953751
Issue 20. #
Summary: Propagation of text-decoration applied to display: contents
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136#issuecomment-301938274
Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9a8bdda32c4d22a2cbc98d6c3724b72f651b6b3
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈
Issue 21. #
Summary: display: block seems to define flex and grid items as block-level
From: Oriol
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292656095
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292738919
Response:
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 22. # Summary: Display erroneously groups ruby with atomic inlines From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180#issuecomment-292638199 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 23. # Summary: Block containers can also establish an inline formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301622704 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301630234 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-314583112 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 24. # Summary: Revisions to *-level definitions From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294637052 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-301623329 Closed: Invalid
Issue 25. # Summary: Do table captions participate in BFC or TFC? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189#issuecomment-301626461 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 26. # Summary: Table contains invalid values From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225#issuecomment-301631015 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 27. # Summary: list-item definition implies invalid keyword combos are valid From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226#issuecomment-301631288 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 28. # Summary: Do contents and none have outer display type? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227#issuecomment-301631748 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 29. # Summary: Run-in erroneously excludes blocks that establish inline formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228#issuecomment-301632605 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2f6354014360662e2aef0e25da433852d4fa8b3a Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 30. # Summary: Blockification rules not backwards-compatible for inline-block From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0042.html ∈
Issue 31. # Summary: Rename “block container” to “flow container” From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301635795 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301639507
Issue 32. # Summary: Text nodes vs text runs From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281#issuecomment-301942809 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈
Issue 33. # Summary: Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310#issuecomment-301641199 Closed: OutOfScope Notes: Deferred to css-pseudo-4, as ::first-line in general needs tighter definition Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈
Issue 34. # Summary: Define 'display: contents' as a type of box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299120942 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299247618 Closed: Retracted
Issue 35. # Summary: Define more sensible blockification for layout-internal types From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340#issuecomment-301641681 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5aaca4a7030e818cd02ac2d93137e1cd1d295bae Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 36. # Summary: Inlinification, recursion, and ruby vs display definitions From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301643296 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301944521 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-313204672 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈
Issue 37. # Summary: Does display: contents apply to ::before ::after From: Emilio Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345#issuecomment-313205067 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html ∈
Issue 38. # Summary: Define interaction of various box tree fixups From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301878155 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301888405 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302250667 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302748058 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed3420bc69b90786 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 39. # Summary: Root inline box vs anonymous inline boxes From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301832460 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301833956 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301872204 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6aeeabe060c8d8c1397ef2196a4e3a62da964d5e Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 40. # Summary: Inlinification by display type or anon box fixup? From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390#issuecomment-313211238 Closed: Retracted
Issue 41. # Summary: Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820 Closed: OutOfScope Notes: Accepted, pending edits to css-2 and css-position-3 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html ∈
Issue 42. # Summary: Are run-in contents inside ::first-line? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313246128 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313249402
Issue 43. # Summary: “Becoming a formatting context” section is a mess From: Oriol, fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563#issuecomment-314573128 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/94982e838a558e6c66516b3b13e403eae32e27ad Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0030.html ∈
Issue 44. # Summary: Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458#issuecomment-313224602 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 45. # Summary: Does run-in algo recurse? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460#issuecomment-314593762 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d7252eeff5abf1 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 46. # Summary: Parallel construction should be pairwise disjoint (editorial) From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1470 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2de3fdcd86e06 Closed: Fixed Resolved: Editorial
Issue 47. # Summary: BFC definition not quite right From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313240736 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3 Resolved: Editorial
Issue 48. # Summary: Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472#issuecomment-313242917 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 49. # Summary: Note wrt inheritance of ::first-line through 'display: contents'. From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473#issuecomment-313247421 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 50. # Summary: Display types: on elements or on boxes? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314569164 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314583675
Issue 51. # Summary: Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct? From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486#issuecomment-320022628 Closed: Invalid
Issue 52. # Summary: At-risk list omits three-component values From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1490 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/394c62f72fda4ac824c9ce204a99bf991b9e6471 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 53. # Summary: Discrepancies in run-in From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491#issuecomment-314570280 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 54. # Summary: Serialization of list-item values not listed From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493#issuecomment-314572350 Closed: OutOfScope (to CSSOM) / Rejected (for editorial) Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial
Issue 55. # Summary: Missing definition of 'inline-list-item' From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html ∈
Issue 56. # Summary: Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-319986260 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-320027059
Issue 57. # Summary: Inlinification doesn't inlinify layout-internal boxes From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582#issuecomment-314605575 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 58. # Summary: with no box example is confusing From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494427 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494885 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313498359 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-391181313 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/beb5964179f6fc815e59e23a1de501cddab7355a Closed: Accepted Notes: See also https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3702 Resolved: Editorial
Issue 59. # Summary: Blocks that contain only inlines, establishing BFC+IFC? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553#issuecomment-375120025 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/8bb4d824180eccee53864aa40b883d0eb7140c0a Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 60. # Summary: Define establishing a BFC as a flow-root only thing via used values From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0258e7ac526cffce6e81d13110ba79a681504fff Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/72141508e866058bd9a431abdb97c3406d9e34b2 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈
Issue 61. # Summary: Is the principal box unique? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604#issuecomment-374366647 Closed: OutOfScope Notes: Follow-up for css-flow-3 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1477
Issue 62. # Summary: run-in fixup should create inline-block when parent inlinifies From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607#issuecomment-374368323 Closed: Invalid
Issue 63. # Summary: Define how block containers establish an inline formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374369526 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374376423 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374385637 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-398958073 Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 64. # Summary: Position of 'list-item' when serializing 'display' From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621#issuecomment-374730492 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 65. # Summary: Clarify that outer display type only affects principal box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1622 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c5d8900d4cc8dedd4f7a02d506d0e0cd2cb5a639 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 66. # Summary: Compact at-risk list From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1623 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9f72f245cba50a173813c36b771f552fe8104964 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 67. # Summary: list-item generates ::marker pseudo-element (not necessarily box) From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1625 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ed5c6a31724e014f3336dbf7901c5ef5cb1eaf20 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 68. # Summary: Mismatched references (to CSS2 vs css-lists-3) From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626#issuecomment-374373751 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/7af6650e9ad441bac22fe833cb413112262f9149 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 69. # Summary: Mention that block ruby generates principal block box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1629 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5e90348a26aecbed6d878cce89cbbc7db1b058ff Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 70. # Summary: run-in insertion point vs ::marker with 'display' From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638#issuecomment-316979494 Closed: Retracted
Issue 71. # Summary: Are run-in sequences merged during reparenting? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1639 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ef3c8fd8b2fe85c32a2dc393ca3b2810a414ea88 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 72. # Summary: Clarify run-in recursion vs anonymous-block wrapping From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374384660 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c7841af7ab963a5e91b2436ffe60ece80700cc7e Closed: Accepted Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374390920 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-398963365 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editorial
Issue 73. # Summary: Define inner display type of replaced elements From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-374399290 Closed: Invalid
Issue 74. # Summary: How does inner display type compute on replaced elements if out of scope? From: Sebastien Zartner Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-317237475 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-398964350 Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editorial
Issue 75. # Summary: Define style computation reflection between boxes and elements From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702#issuecomment-374415941 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/b2d484c6ab9c4dbdb8fdca899e2d37d59d6953e3 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ∈
Issue 76. # Summary: Define some box construction guidance for specs From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/533ac0a31b0262c4a0d09c77e19604666fe35e14 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ∈
Issue 77. # Summary: table grid box is not a defined term From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-376733708 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-378768000 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/193022f623acd1b95a1fddae76fd98408a618d8b Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 78. # Summary: Rename table box to table grid box (in CSS2 & CSS Tables L3) From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501#issuecomment-380792875 Open: Changing back is pending edits to CSS2 and css-tables-3 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0044.html ∈
Issue 79. # Summary: Boxes shouldn't have display types, should only have levels/FC-types From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-374423595 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-407597682 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editorial
Issue 80. # Summary: Explicitly exclude non-zero sequences of run-ins from processing From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398970537 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398982401 Resolved: Editorial
Issue 81. # Summary: Link to definition of white space From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1664 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ada381e196c8ed510977cb55916ee5fb96447b25 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 82. # Summary: s/text/text run/ now that text run is defined From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1667 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c3a695c65170e1667090d87310b87df79d93d398 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 83. # Summary: What if containing block is not ICB and not generated from a box? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-319916887 Closed: Invalid Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-350404179 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-374790036 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 84. # Summary: Make inlinified 'block ruby' an inline-block instead of inline From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700#issuecomment-374415499 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 85. # Summary: 'block' only generates block-level boxes in flow layout From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704#issuecomment-374418771 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4358d72a927b265d9b7482a57277dc635c076b76 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 86. # Summary: Clarify blockification of 'run-in flow-root' From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715#issuecomment-374420463 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ∈
Issue 87. # Summary: 'display' computed value wrong in propdef table From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 89. # Summary: Do empty text nodes generate text runs? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808#issuecomment-329345715 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4c21a2aa923a757c577bf4a4e33a6291a78c8690 Closed: Accepted
Issue 90. # Summary: Clarify element tree definition From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810#issuecomment-375137826 Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈
Issue 91. # Summary: SVG 'display: contents' interaction incompletely defined From: Rune Lillesveen Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118#issuecomment-374802030 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2cdf747bbbfe0c58a87455beca9c35b72555b09a Closed: Accepted
Issue 92. # Summary: Define interaction of 'display: contents' and MathML From: Emilio Álvarez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375119086 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1d3e6a04c847df82fa3c4023e23f4ea55dcab169 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375792285 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ∈
Issue 93. # Summary: Does 'display' affect screen reader semantics? From: Ilya Streltsyn Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-368287740 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-375084853 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378670370 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378778909 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 94. # Summary: Does 'display: contents' affect anchor targeting? From: Ilya Streltsyn Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378842501 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378992876 Changes: https://github.com/fergald/csswg-drafts/commit/2343af6382b55e8ce5caf9c0ee40d68ef032b421 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 95. # Summary: Effect of 'display: contents' on SVG layout attributes From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-378809174 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-399498551
Issue 96. # Summary: Integrate definition of Shadow Trees From: Anne van Kesteren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2365 Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈
Issue 97. # Summary: Blockification should establish a new formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598#issuecomment-387157017 Closed: Invalid
Issue 98. # Summary: Swap where default inner/outer display types are defined From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-391175246 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-393271657 Resolved: Editorial
Issue 99. Summary: Blockification of blocks should establish new FC From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673#issuecomment-389935782 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html ∈ Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html ∈
Issue 100. # Summary: Compute 'display: contents' on elided elements to 'none' From: Emlio Álvarez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2755 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f13b84237c6a17823ebdd55919d15d3bac83275b Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jun/0032.html ∈
Issue 101. #
Summary: Revisit equivalency of inline-block and inline flow-root
From: Oriol Brufau
Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2947
Closed: Rejected
Notes: See also earlier issues / discussion.
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html ∈
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html ∈