Sara Galletti | Duke University (original) (raw)

Books by Sara Galletti

Research paper thumbnail of Le Palais du Luxembourg de Marie de Médicis, 1611-1631, Paris: Éditions Picard, 2012

Journal articles by Sara Galletti

Research paper thumbnail of "Philibert de L’Orme’s Dome in the Chapel of the Château d’Anet: The Role of Stereotomy," Architectural History 64 (2021): 253-84

Architectural History, 2021

Research paper thumbnail of "Épures d’Architecture: Geometric Constructions for Vault Building in Philibert de L’Orme’s Premier Tome de l’Architecture (1567)," Opus Incertum 6 (2020): 76–89

Research paper thumbnail of "From Stone to Paper: Philibert de L’Orme, the Premier tome de l’architecture (1567), and the Birth of Stereotomic Theory." Aedificare: International Journal of Construction History 2, no. 2 (2018): 143-62.

Research paper thumbnail of "Un dessin inédit du plafond sculpté par Christophe Cochet dans la galerie Henri IV du Palais du Luxembourg, 1629–1646," in Revue de l'Art, no. 196 (2017): 61-67

Research paper thumbnail of "Stereotomy and the Mediterranean: Notes Toward an Architectural History," Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge, no. 2 (2017): 73-120

Research paper thumbnail of “Philibert de l’Orme’s Divine Proportions and the Composition of the Premier tome de l’Architecture,” Architectural Histories 2 n. 1 (2014): 12, 1–11

In his Premier tome de l’architecture (1567) — the first original, comprehensive architectural tr... more In his Premier tome de l’architecture (1567) — the first original, comprehensive architectural treatise written by a French author — Philibert Delorme (c. 1514–1570) claims to be the first to formulate a theory of divine proportions, which he describes as a set of rules recorded in the Old Testament as directly dictated by God to men for the construction of the Ark of Noah, the Ark of the Covenant, and the Temple and House of Solomon. Yet the author does not develop the theory of divine proportions in the Premier tome and postpones it instead to the second volume of his treatise. As a second volume was never published (and likely never written), Delorme readers are left with a handful of less-than-coherent references and illustrations of a theory that remains largely obscure. Yet the elements of theory of divine proportions contained in the Premier tome provide historians with an understanding of the genesis of the treatise itself, thus ultimately helping to raise broader questions about the book and its author. This paper shows how Delorme’s divine proportions offer a key to understanding the conception and composition of his treatise as well as to the process of intellectual development of the author and the changes in the nature and scope of his written work.

Research paper thumbnail of “Rubens’s Life of Maria de' Medici: Dissimulation and the Politics of Art in Early Seventeenth-Century France,” Renaissance Quarterly 67 n. 3 (2014): 878–916

The Life of Maria de’ Medici, the biographical series of twenty-four large-size paintings execute... more The Life of Maria de’ Medici, the biographical series of twenty-four large-size paintings executed for the Queen Mother of France by Peter Paul Rubens in 1622 –25, is traditionally regarded by historians as both a masterpiece of Baroque art and a monument of political naïveté. According to this view, the series was a disrespectful visual bravado that exposed both patron and painter to scandal by publicly advertising the queen’s political ideas and ambitions, which were not only audacious, but often in opposition to those of her son King Louis XIII. This article challenges this
assessment by reading the Life within the context of seventeenth-century uses of dissimulation and spatial control as strategies to limit both intellectual and physical access to information. It argues
that the series was imbued with multiple layers of meaning, intended for different audiences, and that access to these was strictly controlled by the queen and her circle.

Research paper thumbnail of “Before the Academy: Research Trends in the History of French Early Modern Architecture before the Age of Louis XIV,” Perspective 2013 n. 1: 43–65

Research paper thumbnail of “Female Agency and Early Modern Urbanism: the Paris of Maria de' Medici,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 71 n. 2 (June 2012): 186–203

Research paper thumbnail of “Jacques Androuet du Cerceau: les nouveaux contours d’une œuvre,” Perspective 2010–2011, n. 3: 482–88

Research paper thumbnail of “Rubens et la galerie de Henri IV au palais du Luxembourg (1628–1630),” Bulletin Monumental 166 n. 1 (March 2008): 43–51

Research paper thumbnail of “L’architecture de Domenico del Barbiere: Troyes 1548–1552,” Revue de l’Art n. 136 (2002): 37–54

Essays in edited volumes by Sara Galletti

Research paper thumbnail of "Philibert de L’Orme’s Divine Proportions and the Composition of the Premier tome de l’architecture." In Proportional Systems in the History of Architecture A Critical Reconsideration, edited by Matthew Cohen and Maarten Delbeke. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2018, 397-414

Research paper thumbnail of "It's a man's world." In Consuelo Lollobrigida, Pictura et Architectura celebris: Plautilla Bricci protagonista femminile del Barocco romano. Rome: Gangemi Editore, 2017, p. 11-14

Research paper thumbnail of "Rubens et la Vie de Marie de Médicis, 1622-1625," in Dominique Jacquot (ed.), Rubens : portraits princiers : exposition, Paris, Musée du Luxembourg, du 4 octobre 2017 au 14 janvier 2018, Paris, 2017, p. 16-35

Research paper thumbnail of "The Royal Gallery at the Time of Henri IV: Architecture and Ceremonial," in Henri IV: Art et Pouvoir, edited by Colette Nativel and Luisa Capodieci, Tours: Presses Universities François Rabelais, 2016: 327-40 and XLIV-XLVI

Research paper thumbnail of “Architecture and Ceremonial in Early Modern France: the Court of Maria de’ Medici,” in Moving Elites: Women and Cultural Transfers in the European Court System, edited by Giulia Calvi and Isabelle Chabot, HEC Working Papers, Florence: European University Institute, 2010: 77–111

Research paper thumbnail of “Projet et chantier à la Renaissance: l’église Saint-Nicolas de Troyes, 1524–1608,” in Some degree of happiness. Studi di storia dell’architettura in onore di Howard Burns, edited by Maria Beltramini and Caroline Elam, Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 2010: 173–91

Research paper thumbnail of "Pitti a Parigi? Metamorfosi di un modello architettonico al seguito di Maria de' Medici," in La réception de modèles cinquecenteschi dans la théorie et les arts français du XVIIe siècle, ed. by S. Frommel and F. Bardati, Geneva: Droz, 2010: 177–98

Research paper thumbnail of "Philibert de L’Orme’s Dome in the Chapel of the Château d’Anet: The Role of Stereotomy," Architectural History 64 (2021): 253-84

Architectural History, 2021

Research paper thumbnail of "Épures d’Architecture: Geometric Constructions for Vault Building in Philibert de L’Orme’s Premier Tome de l’Architecture (1567)," Opus Incertum 6 (2020): 76–89

Research paper thumbnail of "From Stone to Paper: Philibert de L’Orme, the Premier tome de l’architecture (1567), and the Birth of Stereotomic Theory." Aedificare: International Journal of Construction History 2, no. 2 (2018): 143-62.

Research paper thumbnail of "Un dessin inédit du plafond sculpté par Christophe Cochet dans la galerie Henri IV du Palais du Luxembourg, 1629–1646," in Revue de l'Art, no. 196 (2017): 61-67

Research paper thumbnail of "Stereotomy and the Mediterranean: Notes Toward an Architectural History," Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge, no. 2 (2017): 73-120

Research paper thumbnail of “Philibert de l’Orme’s Divine Proportions and the Composition of the Premier tome de l’Architecture,” Architectural Histories 2 n. 1 (2014): 12, 1–11

In his Premier tome de l’architecture (1567) — the first original, comprehensive architectural tr... more In his Premier tome de l’architecture (1567) — the first original, comprehensive architectural treatise written by a French author — Philibert Delorme (c. 1514–1570) claims to be the first to formulate a theory of divine proportions, which he describes as a set of rules recorded in the Old Testament as directly dictated by God to men for the construction of the Ark of Noah, the Ark of the Covenant, and the Temple and House of Solomon. Yet the author does not develop the theory of divine proportions in the Premier tome and postpones it instead to the second volume of his treatise. As a second volume was never published (and likely never written), Delorme readers are left with a handful of less-than-coherent references and illustrations of a theory that remains largely obscure. Yet the elements of theory of divine proportions contained in the Premier tome provide historians with an understanding of the genesis of the treatise itself, thus ultimately helping to raise broader questions about the book and its author. This paper shows how Delorme’s divine proportions offer a key to understanding the conception and composition of his treatise as well as to the process of intellectual development of the author and the changes in the nature and scope of his written work.

Research paper thumbnail of “Rubens’s Life of Maria de' Medici: Dissimulation and the Politics of Art in Early Seventeenth-Century France,” Renaissance Quarterly 67 n. 3 (2014): 878–916

The Life of Maria de’ Medici, the biographical series of twenty-four large-size paintings execute... more The Life of Maria de’ Medici, the biographical series of twenty-four large-size paintings executed for the Queen Mother of France by Peter Paul Rubens in 1622 –25, is traditionally regarded by historians as both a masterpiece of Baroque art and a monument of political naïveté. According to this view, the series was a disrespectful visual bravado that exposed both patron and painter to scandal by publicly advertising the queen’s political ideas and ambitions, which were not only audacious, but often in opposition to those of her son King Louis XIII. This article challenges this
assessment by reading the Life within the context of seventeenth-century uses of dissimulation and spatial control as strategies to limit both intellectual and physical access to information. It argues
that the series was imbued with multiple layers of meaning, intended for different audiences, and that access to these was strictly controlled by the queen and her circle.

Research paper thumbnail of “Before the Academy: Research Trends in the History of French Early Modern Architecture before the Age of Louis XIV,” Perspective 2013 n. 1: 43–65

Research paper thumbnail of “Female Agency and Early Modern Urbanism: the Paris of Maria de' Medici,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 71 n. 2 (June 2012): 186–203

Research paper thumbnail of “Jacques Androuet du Cerceau: les nouveaux contours d’une œuvre,” Perspective 2010–2011, n. 3: 482–88

Research paper thumbnail of “Rubens et la galerie de Henri IV au palais du Luxembourg (1628–1630),” Bulletin Monumental 166 n. 1 (March 2008): 43–51

Research paper thumbnail of “L’architecture de Domenico del Barbiere: Troyes 1548–1552,” Revue de l’Art n. 136 (2002): 37–54