The major parasitic platyhelminth classes — progressive or regressive evolution? (original) (raw)
Abstract
The evolution of certain ontogenetic processes appears to be of special importance to subsequent evolution of a phyletic line, and their occurrence suggests there are various ‘evolutionary capacity levels’ occupied by major taxa. Two groups that are at the same evolutionary capacity level probably originated in common within that level, which in turn is often shared with several other groups. Morphogenesis by invagination is characteristic of an early evolutionary capacity level common to poriferans, cnidarians, deuterostomes, and platyhelminths, inter alia. In the early ontogeny of the former three groups, this process produces the blastopore and archenteron, but in platyhelminths, e.g. rhabdocoels, two different processes form the digestive system: the mouth forms by invagination and the intestine by a split in the mesenchyme/parenchyma. I have selected some characters and processes to illustrate evolutionary capacity levels and to describe the possible origin of a number of invertebrate groups from various levels and their inter-relationships. My analysis on the basis of evolutionary capacity levels suggests that the deuterostomes originated early (very likely before mollusks and annelids), that tegumental absorption of nutriments is the original mode of nutriment uptake and so predates intestinal ingestion in Platyhelminthes, that ontogenetic characters show that the presumed origin of cercomeromorphaeans from rhabdocoels is improbable, and that features of ontogeny and life cycles indicate that the major parasitic platyhelminth classes arose through progressive rather than regressive evolution. Thus the non-parasitic and the parasitic platyhelminth classes very likely belong to separate evolutionary lines, all originating from the same evolutionary capacity level.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Berrill, N. J., 1949. Developmental analysis of scyphomedusae. Biol. Rev. 24: 393–410.
Google Scholar - Bychowsky, B. E., 1957. [Monogenetic trematodes, their systematics and phylogeny.] (In Russian, English translation: Virginia Inst. mar. Sci. Transl. Ser. 1, AIBS, Washington D.C., 1961.) Zool. Inst. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow and Leningrad.
Google Scholar - Hyman, L. H., 1951. The Invertebrates, vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York, Toronto, London, 550 pp.
Google Scholar - Janicki, C., 1920. Grundlinien einer ‘Cercomer’-Theorie zur Morphologie der Trematoden und Cestoden. Festschr. für Zschokke 30: 1–22.
Google Scholar - Lambert, A., 1980. Oncomiracidiums et phylogenèse des Monogenea (Platyhelminthes). Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 55(3): 281–325.
Google Scholar - Lambert, A. & A. Denis, 1982. Étude de l'oncomiracidium Diplozoon nipponicum Goto, 1891. Hapteur larvaire d'un type nouveau pour le genre Diplozoon, Monogenea, Discocotylidae. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 57(6): 533–542.
Google Scholar - Mackiewicz, J. S., 1981. Caryophillidae (Cestoidea): Evolution and Classification. Adv. Parasitol. 19: 139–225.
Google Scholar - Malmberg, G., 1970. The excretory systems and the marginal hooks as a basis for the systematics of Gyrodactylus (Trematoda, Monogenea). Ark. Zool. Ser. 2. 23(1): 1–235.
Google Scholar - Malmberg, G., 1971. On the procercoid protonephridial systems of three Diphyllobothrium species (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidae) and Janicki's cercomer theory. Zool. Scr. 1: 43–56.
Google Scholar - Malmberg, G., 1974. On the larval protonephridial system of Gyrocotyle and the evolution of Cercomeromorphae (Platyhelminthes). Zool. Scr. 3: 65–81.
Google Scholar - Malmberg, G., 1978. Further studies on the evolution of the Cercomeromorphae. In Short Communications, Section A, p. 79. Fourth International Congress of Parasitology. 19–26 August 1978. Warszawa, Poland.
- Malmberg, G., 1979a. Ontogeny and fine structure as a basis for a discussion on the relationship Cestoda — Monogenea (Platyhelminthes). Zool. Scr. 8: 315.
Google Scholar - Malmberg, 1974b. The hyperparasitic post larval stages of Gyrocotyle. Institute of Parasitology. Åbo Akademi, Åbo, INFORMATION 15: 37–38.
Google Scholar - Malmberg, G., 1981. Neoteny or not in the cercomeromorphaeans. Parasitology 82: 164–165.
Google Scholar - Malmberg, G., 1982. On evolutionary processes in Monogenea, though basically from a less traditional viewpoint. In D. F. Mettrick & S. S. Desser (eds), Parasites — their world and ours. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford: 198–202.
Google Scholar - Malmberg, G., 1983. [The tapeworm — not harmless but always intestineless. On investigations concerning parasitic platyhelminths.] (In Swedish). Fauna och Flora 78: 183–192.
Google Scholar - Ogawa, K. & S. Egusa, 1981. The systematic position of the genus Anoplodiscus, Monogenea, Anoplodiscidae. Syst. Parasitol. 2(4): 253–260.
Google Scholar - Rohde, K. & M. Georgi, 1983. Structure and development of Austramphilina elongata Johnston, 1931 (Cestodaria: Amphilinidea). Int. J. Parasitol. 13(3): 273–287.
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Zoologiska Institutionen, University of Stockholm, S-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
G. Malmberg
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malmberg, G. The major parasitic platyhelminth classes — progressive or regressive evolution?.Hydrobiologia 132, 23–29 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046224
- Issue date: January 1986
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046224