Characteristics of “anti” saccades in man (original) (raw)

• 393 Accesses
• 223 Citations
• Explore all metrics

Summary

Four subjects — all made large numbers of Express saccades in the normal gap task — were instructed to make saccades in the direction opposite to the side where a visual stimulus appeared (“anti” task). Gap and overlap trials were used. Saccadic reaction time (SRT), velocity and amplitude of the corresponding eye movements were analysed and compared to those of saccades made in the normal task. The velocity of “anti saccades” was found to be slightly (up to 15%) but significantly slower in two subjects. The distributions of SRTs in normal gap tasks show a small group of anticipatory saccades (with SRT below 80 ms and slower velocities) followed by a group of saccades with fast reaction times between 80 ms and 120 ms (Express saccades) followed by another large group ranging up to 180 ms (regular saccades). In the gap anti task there are anticipatory saccades and saccades with SRTs above 100 ms; Express saccades are missing. The distribution of SRTs obtained in the overlap anti task was unimodal with a mean value of 231 ms as compared to 216 ms in the normal task. The introduction of the gap therefore clearly decreases the reaction times of the anti saccades. Control experiments show that the delay of anti saccades is not due to an interhemispheric transfer time but must be attributed to the saccade generating system taking more time to program a saccade to a position where no visual stimulus appears. These data are discussed as providing further evidence for the existence of a reflex-like pathway connecting the retina to the oculomotor nuclei mediating the Express saccade.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
• Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
• Cancel anytime View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Slow Saccades

Chapter © 2019

References

• Boch R (1988) Chemical lesions in V1, V2 and V3 of the rhesus monkey: effects upon express-saccades. In: Elsner N, Barth F (eds) Proceedings of the 16th Göttingen Neurobiology Conference. Thieme, New York
  Google Scholar
• Boch R, Fischer B (1986) Further observations on the occurrence of express-saccades in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 63: 487–494
  Google Scholar
• Deubel H, Wolf W, Hauske G (1986) Adaptive gain control of saccadic eye movements. Human Neurobiol 5: 245–253
  Google Scholar
• Doma H, Hallett PE (1988) Dependence of saccadic eye-movements on stimulus luminance, and an effect of task. Vision Res 28: 915–924
  Google Scholar
• Findlay JM (1982) Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 22: 1033–1045
  Google Scholar
• Fischer B, Boch R (1983) Saccadic eye movements after extremely short reaction times in the monkey. Brain Res 260: 21–26
  Google Scholar
• Fischer B, Breitmeyer B (1987) Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements. Neuropsychologia 25: 73–83
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fischer B (1987) The preparation of visually guided saccades. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 106: 1–35
  Google Scholar
• Fischer B, Ramsperger E (1984) Human express saccades: extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements. Exp Brain Res 57: 191–195
  Google Scholar
• Fischer B, Ramsperger E (1986) Human express saccades: effects of randomization and daily practice. Exp Brain Res 64: 569–578
  Google Scholar
• Frost D, Pöppel E (1976) Different programming modes of human saccadic eye movements as a function of stimulus eccentricity: indications of a functional subdivision of the visual field. Biol Cybern 23: 39–48
  Google Scholar
• Gauthier G, Volle M (1975) Two dimensional eye movement monitor for clinical laboratory recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 39: 285–291
  Google Scholar
• Guitton D, Buchtel HA, Douglas RM (1985) Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades. Exp Brain Res 58: 455–472
  Google Scholar
• Hallett PE (1978) Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Res 18: 1279–1296
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hallett PE, Adams BD (1980) The predictability of saccadic latency in a novel voluntary oculomotor task. Vision Res 20: 329–339
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kalesnykas RP, Hallett PE (1987a) On plotting amplitude-transition functions for voluntary eye saccades. Vision Res 27: 675–679
  Google Scholar
• Kalesnykas RP, Hallett PE (1987b) The differentiation of visually guided and anticipatory saccades in gap and overlap paradigms. Exp Brain Res 68: 115–121
  Google Scholar
• Kapoula Z (1985) Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system. Vision Res 25: 1155–1157
  Google Scholar
• Mohler CW, Wurtz RH (1977) Role of striate cortex and superior colliculus in visual guidance of saccadic eye movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 40: 74–94
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ottes FP, van Gisbergen JA, Eggermont JJ (1984) Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: two different modes. Vision Res 24: 1169–1179
  Google Scholar
• Ottes FP, van Gisbergen JA, Eggermont JJ (1985) Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system. Vision Res 25: 849–862
  Google Scholar
• Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ, Rafal RD (1984) Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci 4: 1863–1874
  Google Scholar
• Reuter-Lorenz PA, Hughes HC, Fendrich R (1991) The reduction of saccadic latency by prior offset of the fixation point: an analysis of the gap effect. Percept Psychophys 49: 167–175
  Google Scholar
• Robinson DL, Petersen SE, Keys W (1986) Saccade-related and visual activities in the pulvinar nuclei of the behaving rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res 62: 625–634
  Google Scholar
• Schiller PH, True SD, Conway JL (1979) Effects of frontal eye field and superior colliculus ablations on eye movements. Science 206: 590–592
  Google Scholar
• Schiller PH, True SD, Conway JL (1980) Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations. J. Neurophysiol 44: 1175–1189
  Google Scholar
• Schiller PH, Sandell JH, Maunsell JH (1987) The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 57: 1033–1049
  Google Scholar
• Smit AC, van Gisbergen JA, Cools AR (1987) A parametric analysis of human saccades in different experimental paradigms. Vision Res 27: 1745–1762
  Google Scholar
• Smit AC, van Gisbergen JA (1989) A short-latency transition in saccade dynamics during squarewave tracking and its significance for the differentiation of visually-guided and predictive saccades. Exp Brain Res 76: 64–74
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, University of Freiburg, Hansastraße 9, W-7800, Freiburg, Federal Republic of Germany
   B. Fischer & H. Weber

Authors

1. B. Fischer
2. H. Weber

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, B., Weber, H. Characteristics of “anti” saccades in man.Exp Brain Res 89, 415–424 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228257

Download citation

• Received: 07 March 1991
• Accepted: 21 November 1991
• Issue date: May 1992
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228257

Key words