Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures (original) (raw)
- Weinstein MC, Stason WB. Hypertension: A Policy Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.
Google Scholar - Kamlet M. The Comparative Benefits Modeling Project. A Framework for Cost-Utility Analysis of Government Health Care Programs. Public Health Service; US Department of Health and Human Services, 1992.
- Guyatt GH, Feeny D, Patick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 622–629.
Google Scholar - Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and items selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483.
Google Scholar - Wu AW, Rubin HR, Mathews WC, et al. A health status questionnaire using 30 items from the medical outcome study: preliminary validation in persons with early HIV disease. Med. Care 1991; 29; 786–798.
Google Scholar - Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health state preferences I: Measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 345–352.
Google Scholar - Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health state preferences II: Scaling methods. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 459–471.
Google Scholar - Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health state preferences III: Population and context effects. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 585–592.
Google Scholar - Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health state preferences IV: Progress and a research agenda. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 675–685.
Google Scholar - Fanshel S, Bush JW. A health-status index and its applications to health-services outcomes. Operations Res 1970; 18: 1021–1066.
Google Scholar - Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states. An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-Economic Plan Sci 1976; 10: 129–136.
Google Scholar - Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities in quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989; 5: 559–575.
Google Scholar - Feeny D, Torrance GW. Incorporating utility-based quality of life assessments in clinical trials: two examples. Med Care 1989; 27: S190-S204.
Google Scholar - Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1944.
Google Scholar - Raiffa H. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1968.
Google Scholar - Bell DE, Farquhar PH. Perspectives on utility theory. Operations Res 1986; 34; 179–183.
Google Scholar - Howard RA. Decision analysis: practice and promise. Manage Sci 1988; 34; 679–695.
Google Scholar - Bator FM. The simple analytics of welfare maximization. Am Econ Rev 1957; 47: 22–59.
Google Scholar - Arrow KJ, Debreu G. Existence of equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 1954; 22: 265–290.
Google Scholar - Arrow KJ. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley, 1951.
Google Scholar - Keeney RL. A group preference axiomatization with cardinal utility. Manage Sci 1976; 23: 140–145.
Google Scholar - Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The general health policy model: an integrated approach. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press, 1990: 131–149.
Google Scholar - Nord E. Methods for quality adjustment of life years. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 559–569.
Google Scholar - Anderson NH. Contributions to Information Integration Theory, Vols 1–3. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Publishers, 1991.
Google Scholar - Mulley AJ. Assessing patient's utilities: can the ends justify the means? Med Care 1989; 27: S269-S281.
Google Scholar - Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, et al. Guide to design and development of health-state utility instrumentation. McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper No 90-9, June 1990.
- Patrick DL, Bush JW, Chen MM. Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index. Health Serv Res 1973; 228–245.
- Nord E. The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states. Int J Health Plan Management 1991.
- Richardson J. Economic Assessment in Health Care: Theory and Practice. National Centre for Health Program Evaluation. Monash University: 1991.
- Stevens SS. A metric for the social consensus. Science 1966; 151: 530.
Google Scholar - Tversky A, Slovic P, Kahneman D. The causes of preference reversals. Am Econ Rev 1990; 80: 205–217.
Google Scholar - MacKeigan LD. Context effects in health state utility assessment: etiology, framing and delay of health outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Tucson: University of Arizona, 1990.
- McNeil BJ, Weischselbaum R, Pauker SG. Speech and survival: trade-offs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. New Engl J Med 1981; 305: 982–987.
Google Scholar - Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol, 1983; 39: 341–350.
Google Scholar - Kaplan RM, Ernst JA. Do category rating scales produce biased preference weights for a health index? Med Care 1983; 21: 193–207.
Google Scholar - Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health Status Index: category rating versus magnitude estimation for measuring levels of well-being. Med Care 1979; 17: 501–525.
Google Scholar - Zhu SH, Anderson NH. Self-estimation of weight parameter in multiattribute analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 1991; 48: 36–54.
Google Scholar - Luce RD. Axioms for the averaging and addition representations of functional measurement. Math Soc Sci 1981; 1: 139–144.
Google Scholar - Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP. Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Operations Res 1982; 30 1042–1069.
Google Scholar - Krischer JP. The utility structure of a medical decision-making problem. Operations Res 1976; 24: 951–972.
Google Scholar - Torrance GW, Yueming Z, Feeny D, et al. Multiattribute preference functions for a comprehensive health status classification system. McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper No 92-18; 1992.
- Feeny D, Furlong W, Barr RD, et al. A comprehensive multi-attribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 923–928.
Google Scholar - Daniels N. Is the Oregon rationing plan fair? J Am Med Assoc 1991; 265: 2232–2235.
Google Scholar - Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. The reliability, stability, and generalizability of a health status index. American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Social Status Section 1978: 704–709.
- Balaban DJ, Fagi PC, Goldfarb NI, et al. Weights for scoring the quality of well-being instrument among rheumatoid arthritics. Med Care 1986; 24: 973–980.
Google Scholar - Nerenz DR, Golob K, Trump DL. Preference weights for the quality of well-being scale as obtained from oncology patients. Unpublished paper, 1990; Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Google Scholar - EuroQol Group. EuroQol — a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16 December: 199–208.
Google Scholar - Kaplan RM. The Hippocratic Predicament: Affordibility, Access and Accountability in American Health Care. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1993.
Google Scholar - Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ 1986; 5: 1.
Google Scholar - Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res 1976; 11: 478–507.
Google Scholar - Kaplan RM. Human preference measurement for health decisions and the evaluation of long-term care. In: Kane RL, Kane RA, eds. Values and Long-Term Care. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1982; 157–188.
Google Scholar