The effect of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement (original) (raw)
References
Beninger, R. J., Mason, S. T., Phillips, A. G., Fibiger, H. C.: The use of conditioned suppression to evaluate the nature of neurolepticinduced avoidance deficits. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. (in press, 1980)
Bersh, P. J.: The influence of two variables upon the establishment of a secondary reinforcer for operant responses. J. Exp. Psychol. 41, 62–73 (1951) Google Scholar
Crow, T. J.: Catecholamine-containing neurons and electrical selfstimulation. 1. A theoretical interpretation and some psychiatric implications Psychol. Med. 3, 66–73 (1973) Google Scholar
Fibiger, H. C.: Drugs and reinforcement mechanisms: A critical review of the catecholamine theory. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 18, 37–51 (1978) Google Scholar
Fibiger, H. C., Zis, A. P., Phillips, A. G.: Haloperidol-induced disruption of conditioned avoidance responding: Attenuation by prior training or by anticholinergic drugs. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 30, 309–314 (1975) Google Scholar
German, D. C., Bowden, D. M.: Catecholamine systems as the neural substrate for intracranial self-stimulation: A hypothesis. Brain Res. 73, 381–419 (1974) Google Scholar
Hill, R. T.: Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism of psychomotor stimulation. In: Amphetamines and related compounds, E. Costa, S. Garattini, eds., pp. 781–795. New York: Raven Press 1970 Google Scholar
Jenkins, W. O.: A temporal gradient of derived reinforcement. Amer. J. Psychol. 63, 237–243 (1950) Google Scholar
Knott, P. D., Clayton, K. N.: Durable secondary reinforcement using brain stimulation as the primary reinforcer. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 61, 151–153 (1966) Google Scholar
Kremer, E. F.: Truly random and traditional control procedures in CER conditioning in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 76, 441–448 (1971) Google Scholar
Kremer, E. F., Kamin, L. J.: The truly random control procedure: Associative and nonassociative effects in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 74, 203–210 (1971) Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. J.: The psychology of animal learning. New York: Academic Press 1974 Google Scholar
Mason, S. T., Beninger, R. J., Fibinger, H. C., Phillips, A. G.: Pimozideinduced suppression of responding: Evidence against a block of food reward. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. (in press, 1980)
Mogenson, G. J., Phillips, A. G.: Brain-stimulation reward after twenty-five years. Canad. J. Psychol. 32, 54–57 (1978) Google Scholar
Olds, J., Milner, P.: Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of the brain. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 47, 419–427 (1954) Google Scholar
Overton, D. A.: Experimental methods for the study of statedependent learning. Fed. Proc. 33, 1800–1813 (1974) Google Scholar
Phillips, A. G., Fibiger, H. C.: The role of dopamine in maintaining intracranial self-stimulation in the ventral tegmentum, nucleus accumbens, and medial prefrontal cortex. Canad. J. Psychol. 32, 58–66 (1978) Google Scholar
Phillips, A. G., Fibiger, H. C.: Decreased resistance to extinction after haloperidol: Implications for the role of dopamine in reinforcement. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 10, 751–760 (1979) Google Scholar
Pinder, R. M., Brogden, R. N., Sawyer, P. R., Speight, T. M., Spencer, R., Avery, G. S.: Pimozide: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic uses in psychiatry. Drugs 12, 1–40 (1976) Google Scholar
Quinsey, V. L.: Conditioned suppression with no CS-US contingency in the rat. Canad. J. Psychol. 25, 69–82 (1971) Google Scholar
Robbins, T. W.: The potentiation of conditioned reinforcement by psychomotor stimulant drugs. A test of Hill's hypothesis. Psychopharmacologia 45, 103–114 (1975) Google Scholar
Robbins, T. W.: Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs. Nature 264, 57–59 (1976) Google Scholar
Robbins, T. W.: The acquisition of responding with conditioning reinforcement: Effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, _d_-amphetamine, and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology 58, 79–87 (1978) Google Scholar
Robbins, T. W., Koob, G. F.: Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 8, 219–222 (1978) Google Scholar
Roberts, D. C. S., Corcoran, M. E., Fibiger, H. C.: On the role of ascending catecholaminergic systems in intravenous selfadministration of cocaine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 6, 615–620 (1977) Google Scholar
Scheel-Kruger, J.: Comparative studies of various amphetamine analogues demonstrating different interactions with the metabolism of the catecholamines in the brain. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 14, 47–59 (1971) Google Scholar
Schlechter, J. M., Butcher, L. L.: Blockade by pimozide of (+)amphetamine induced hyperkinesia in mice. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 24, 408–409 (1972) Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F.: The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1938 Google Scholar
Stein, L.: Secondary reinforcement established with subcortical stimulation. Science 127, 466–467 (1958) Google Scholar
Wauquier, A., Rolls, E. T. (eds.): Brain-stimulation reward. New York: American Elsevier 1976 Google Scholar
Wise, R. A., Spindler, J., deWit, H., Gerber, G. J.: Neuroleptic-induced ‘anhedonia’ in rats: Pimozide blocks the reward quality of food. Science 201, 262–264 (1978) Google Scholar
Yokel, R. A., Wise, R. A.: Increased lever-pressing for amphetamine after pimozide in rats: Implications for a dopamine theory of reward. Science 187, 547–549 (1975) Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. W.: Sustained performance in rats based on secondary reinforcement. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 52, 353–358 (1959) Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. W.: Influence of three stimulus conditions upo the strength of a secondary reinforcement effect. Psychol. Rep. 13, 135–139 (1963) Google Scholar
Zis, A. P., Fibiger, H. C.: Neuroleptic-induced deficits in food and water regulation: Similarities to the lateral hypothalamic syndrome. Psychopharmacologia 43, 63–68 (1975) Google Scholar