Negativity in political perception (original) (raw)
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
References
- Anderson, N. H. (1965). “Averaging vs. Adding as a Stimulus Combination Rule in Person Perception.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 70: 394–400.
Google Scholar - Beigel, A. (1973). “Resistance to Change: Differential Effects of Favorable and Unfavorable Initial Communications.”British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 12: 153–158.
Google Scholar - Bloom, H. S., and H. D. Price (1975). “Voter Response to Short-run Economic Conditions: The asymmetric Effect of Prosperity and Recession.”The American Political Science Review 69: 1240–1254.
Google Scholar - Brody, R. A., and B. I. Page (1972). “The Assessment of Policy Voting.”The American Political Science Review 66: 450–458.
Google Scholar - Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar - Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, and W. L. Rodgers (1976).The Quality of American Life. New York: Russell Sage.
Google Scholar - Converse, P. E. (1966). “The Concept of a Normal Vote.” In A. Campbell et al. (eds),Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar - Festinger, L. (1957).A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar - Folkes, V. S., and D. O. Sears (1977). “Does Everybody Like a Liker?”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13: 505–519.
Google Scholar - Hamilton, D., and M. Zanna (1972). “Differential Weighting of Favorable and Unfavorable Attributes in Impressions of Personality.”Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 6: 204–212.
Google Scholar - Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Reactions. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar - Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky (1979). “Prospect Theory.”Econometrica 47, 263–278.
Google Scholar - Kanouse, D. E., and L. R. Hanson, Jr. (1972). “Negativity in Evaluations.” In E. R. Jones et al. (eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.
Google Scholar - Katz, D., B. Gutek, R. L. Kahn, and E. Barton (1975).Bureaucratic Encounters. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Science Research.
Google Scholar - Kernell, S. (1977). “Presidential Popularity and Negative Voting.”The American Political Science Review 71: 44–66.
Google Scholar - Kinder, D. R. (1978). “Political Person Perception: The asymmetrical Influence of Sentiment and Choice on Perceptions of Presidential Candidates.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 859–871.
Google Scholar - Kinder, D. R., S. T. Fiske, and R. G. Wagner (1980). “Presidents in the Popular Mind: Processes of Leadership Appraisal.” Unpublished manscript, Yale University.
- Kinder, D. R., M. D. Peters, R. P. Abelson, and S. T. Fiske (1980). “Presidential Prototypes.”Political Behavior 2: 315–338.
Google Scholar - Koenigs, R. J. (1974). “The Relative Influence of Positive and Negative Trait Adjectives on Impression Formation and Persistence.”Dissertation Abstracts International 34: (8A, part 2), 5312–5313.
Google Scholar - Kogan, N., and M. A. Wallach (1967). “Risk Taking as a Function of the Situation, the Person, and the Group.” In_New Directions in Psychology III_. New York: Holt.
Google Scholar - Lau, R. R. (1979). “Negativity in Person Perception with Applications to Political Behavior.” Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
- Lubfer, M., M. Jones, and C. Quin (1972). “Group Risk Taking as a Function of Three Types of Monetary Incentives.”Journal of Personality 80:273–282.
Google Scholar - Miller, A. H., M. P. Wattenberg, O. Malanchuk (1982). “Cognitive Representations of Candidate assessments.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.
- Mueller, J. E. (1973).War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar - Myers, J. L., R. E. Reilly, and H. A. Taub (1961). “Differential Cost, Gain, and Relative Frequency Reward in Sequential Choice Situation.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 62: 357–360.
Google Scholar - Raven, B. A., and P. S. Gallo (1965). “The Effects of Nominating Conventions, Elections, and Reference Group Identification upon the Perception of Political Figures.”Human Relations 8: 217–230.
Google Scholar - Rettig, S. and B. Pasamanick (1964). “Differential Judgements of Ethical Risk by Cheaters and Noncheaters.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psycholog 69: 109–113.
Google Scholar - Richey, M., L. McClelland, and A. Shimkunas (1967). “Relative Influence of Positive and Negative Information in Impression Formation and Persistence.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6: 322–327.
Google Scholar - Sears, D. O. (1969). “Political Behavior.” In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.),The Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume 5. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar - Sears, D. O. (1982) “A Person Positivity Bias.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press.
- Sears, D. O., and R. E. Whitney (1974). “Political Persuasion.” In I.D.S. Pool and W. Schramm (eds.),Handbook of Communication. New York: Rand McNally.
Google Scholar - Slovic P. (1969). “Differential Effects of Real Versus Hypothetical Payoffs on Choices among Gambles.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 80:434–437.
Google Scholar - Tesser, A., and S. Rosen (1975). “The Reluctance to Transmit Bad News.” In I. L. Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 8. San Francisco: Academic Press.
Google Scholar - Weisberg, H. F., and J. G. Rusk (1970). “Dimensions of Candidate Evaluations.”The American Political Science Review 64: 1167–1185.
Google Scholar