Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection (original) (raw)
Summary
Habitat selection costs depend upon the scale of habitat. At the fine-grained microhabitat scale, cost is linked to optimal foraging, and habitat selection should be abandoned even though fitness is greater in one microhabitat than in another. At the coarse-grained macrohabitat scale, cost is linked to emigration, and habitat selection should often be maintained even though fitness may be less in the ‘preferred’ macrohabitat than in others. Macrohabitat selection cost is easily incorporated into habitat selection theory and can be tested by linear regression techniques on isodars (lines of every point at which the fitness of individuals in one habitat equals that of individuals in another). The results of one recent survey of white-footed mice living in different macrohabitats are consistent with the predictions of emigration cost.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Charnov, E. L. (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.Theor. Pop. Biol. 9, 129–36.
Google Scholar - Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas, H. R. (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical Development.Acta Bioth. 19, 16–36.
Google Scholar - Holt, R. D. (1985) Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution.Theor. Pop. Biol. 28, 181–208.
Google Scholar - Morris, D. W. (1982) Age-specific dispersal strategies in iteroparous species: who leaves when?Evol. Theory 6, 53–65.
Google Scholar - Morris, D. W. (1987a) Ecological scale and habitat use.Ecology 68, 362–9.
Google Scholar - Morris, D. W. (1987b) Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment.Ecol. Monog. 57, 269–81.
Google Scholar - Morris, D. W. (in review, a). Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure.Evol. Ecol.
- Morris, D. W. (in review, b). Density-dependent habitat selection: testing assumptions with white-footed mice.
- Rosenzweig, M. L. (1974) On the evolution of habitat selection. In_Proc. 1st Int. Cong. Ecol._ pp. 401–4. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wagenigen, The Netherlands.
Google Scholar - Rosenzweig, M. L. (1981) A theory of habitat selection.Ecology 62, 327–35.
Google Scholar - Rosenzweig, M. L. (1985) Some theoretical aspects of habitat selection. In_Habitat Selection in Birds_ (M. L. Cody, ed.), pp. 517–40. Academic Press, London.
Google Scholar - Rosenzweig, M. L. and Abramsky, Z. (1986) Centrifugal community organization.Oikos 46, 339–48.
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, A1B 3X9, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
Douglas W. Morris
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morris, D.W. Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection.Evol Ecol 1, 379–388 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071560
- Issue date: October 1987
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071560