Estimation and Tests of Significance in Factor Analysis | Psychometrika | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

A distinction is drawn between the method of principal components developed by Hotelling and the common factor analysis discussed in psychological literature both from the point of view of stochastic models involved and problems of statistical inference. The appropriate statistical techniques are briefly reviewed in the first case and detailed in the second. A new method of analysis called the canonical factor analysis, explaining the correlations between rather than the variances of the measurements, is developed. This analysis furnishes one out of a number of possible solutions to the maximum likelihood equations of Lawley. It admits an iterative procedure for estimating the factor loadings and also for constructing the likelihood criterion useful in testing a specified hypothesis on the number of factors and in determining a lower confidence limit to the number of factors.

References

Bartlett, M. S. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Brit. J. Psychol., Statist. Sect., 1950, 3, 77–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartlett, M. S. A further note on tests of significance in factor analysis. Brit. J. Psychol., Statist. Sect., 1951, 4, 1–2CrossRef Google Scholar

Burt, C. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Brit. J. Psychol., Statist. Sect., 1952, 5, 109–133CrossRef Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. The description and measurement of personality, Yonkers, New York: World Book Co., 1946Google Scholar

Davis, F. B. Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Psychometrika, 1944, 9, 185–185CrossRef Google Scholar

Holzinger, K. J., and Harman, H. H.. Factor analysis, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1941Google Scholar

Hotelling, H. Analysis of a complex of variables into principal components. J. educ. Psychol., 1933, 24, 417–441CrossRef Google Scholar

Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood. Proc. roy. Soc. Edin., 1940, 60, 64–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Lawley, D. N. Further investigations in factor estimation. Proc. roy. Soc. Edin., 1941, 61, 176–185Google Scholar

Neuhaus, J. O., and Wrigley, C. F. The quadrimax method: an analytic approach to orthogonal simple structure. Manuscript on file in the Univ. Illinois Library, 1953.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rao, C. R. Advanced statistical methods in biometric research, New York: Wiley, 1952Google Scholar

Rao, C. R. Discriminant functions for genetic differentiation and selection. Sankhyā, 1953, 12, 229–229Google Scholar

Thomson, G. H. The factorial analysis of human ability 5th ed., London: Univ. London Press, 1951Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. A new rotational method in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1938, 3, 199–218CrossRef Google Scholar