Estimation of True Score and Error Variance for Tests Under Various Equivalence Assumptions | Psychometrika | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Maximum-likelihood estimators of true score variance and error variance for mental tests are derived for six different models of equivalent measurements. Statistical properties of the estimators are examined. Main emphasis is placed upon essentially _τ_-equivalent measurements. A statistical criterion for this type of measurement is given. The solution of the comparatively simple maximum-likelihood equations is effected by means of a rapid Newton-Raphson procedure. Two different initial estimators are considered and their relative merits in terms of second moments evaluated. Four numerical examples are appended by way of illustration.

References

Anderson, T. W. Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, 1958, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G. Statistical models for congeneric test scores. Proceedings, 76th Annual Convention, APA, 1968, 213–214.Google Scholar

Kristof, W. Statistical inferences about the error variance. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 129–143.10.1007/BF02289611CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristof, W. The statistical theory of stepped-up reliability coefficients when a test has been divided into several equivalent parts. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. Statistical theories of mental test scores, 1968, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Novick, M. R., & Lewis, C. Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 1–13.10.1007/BF02289400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilks, S. S. Sample criteria for testing equality of means, equality of variances, and equality of covariances in a normal multivariate distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1946, 17, 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar